House of Harmonious Wisdom Replayability?


Pathfinder Society

1 to 50 of 96 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
3/5 *

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I know that the House of Harmonious Wisdom can be played multiple times as a 1st level character but only once as a higher level character. I am currently signed up to play this soon, and was planning to bring a new level 1 character, or possibly a pregen 1. I have already played it once with a higher level character. Based off of sign-ups, it looks like the table is going to go high tier. So here's the question: Can I play this with a level 4 pregen if I use the "apply to a new level 1 character" rule? If not, am I allowed to play with a level 1 pregen even if the tier is 4-5 (and are there any such pregens likely to survive such an arrangement)? If the answer to both of these is 'no', then I'd like to know ASAP, as I'll need to build a new level 1 character to play.

Thanks!

1/5

a lv1 pregen is the same as a lv1 character, so yes it's fine to run through it out of tier.

A lv4 pregen wouldn't be allowed though, as you've already played it higher than 1.

Grand Lodge 2/5

2 people marked this as a favorite.

That's the problem with this scenario. We can get a 5, 3, 4, 3,...and a 1. The guy with the 1 has already "played up" on it so he's stuck at level 1.

Or we could get five people that show up with a level 1 and then a sixth person that shows up with a level 5--and apparently at that point I as the gm am supposed to tell them that they shouldn't play the character they planned/brought with them.

Silver Crusade 4/5 5/55/55/5

Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path, Maps, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Maps Subscriber
claudekennilol wrote:

That's the problem with this scenario. We can get a 5, 3, 4, 3,...and a 1. The guy with the 1 has already "played up" on it so he's stuck at level 1.

Or we could get five people that show up with a lvl 1 and then a sixth person that shows up with a 5--and apparently at that point I as the gm am supposed to tell them that they shouldn't play the character they planned/brought with them.

There's no downside in terms of gold/prestige/etc. from playing out of subtier (high) at least. The gold in particular is tied to the level of the character, not the tier you're playing in.

It does make it a losing proposition for a level 1, though. Extra risk without the reward.

Sovereign Court 5/5

claudekennilol wrote:

That's the problem with this scenario. We can get a 5, 3, 4, 3,...and a 1. The guy with the 1 has already "played up" on it so he's stuck at level 1.

Or we could get five people that show up with a level 1 and then a sixth person that shows up with a level 5--and apparently at that point I as the gm am supposed to tell them that they shouldn't play the character they planned/brought with them.

but wait - that's always been a problem in almost every game. any game with a spread of sub-tiers can get that problem.

5 players show up with characters just barely inside the minimum for the scenario and then you get that one guy who shows up with a PC at the top of the Tier.

This has been an issue sense season 0, and happens in every scenario with a spread of sub-tiers. At least we only have a few Tier 1-7 games where its "five people that show up with a level 1 and then a sixth person that shows up with a level..." 7. Or the one I vividly remember with three newbies with freshly minted 2nd levels, two total beginners (Iconic 1sts) and one guy insisting on playing his 7th. "Why can't they switch out and play higher level Iconics? Yeah, they have to, we're in Tier 3-4, so they have to play 4th level Iconics..."

How is your example different from that?

edit: and for the first case - I am not sure of your problem with this. The 1st level player KNEW he had to play a 1st level (he's coming in for a re-run of it right?), so I am assuming he arrived with a 1st level ready to play. Why would he be expecting to play higher level? I guess we could lobby to allow him run a 4th level Iconic and assign the CR to a 1st level PC... Is that what you are suggesting? If so, sure - I'll sign up for that. It'll be a bit odd and we'll have games where we have several players playing 4th level Iconics though... say 5 players replaying with 4th level Iconics, and a newbie with his 3rd... or maybe even 2nd level PC.

Silver Crusade 4/5

claudekennilol wrote:

That's the problem with this scenario. We can get a 5, 3, 4, 3,...and a 1. The guy with the 1 has already "played up" on it so he's stuck at level 1.

Or we could get five people that show up with a level 1 and then a sixth person that shows up with a level 5--and apparently at that point I as the gm am supposed to tell them that they shouldn't play the character they planned/brought with them.

Agree with Muse that your second scenario is no different than playing any other adventure.

The first problem is unique to this adventure, though. Because it's 1-5, but allows replays only at level 1, I can imagine we'll see this a lot. You'll have players showing up to play it like any other 1-5, wanting to play level 4 and 5 PCs, and then one or two people show up with level 1s ready to replay, who can't bring a higher PC even if they have one. If the high tier folks outnumber the replay folks, then those level 1s are likely to die.

1/5 5/5

Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber
Fromper wrote:


Agree with Muse that your second scenario is no different than playing any other adventure.

The first problem is unique to this adventure, though. Because it's 1-5, but allows replays only at level 1, I can imagine we'll see this a lot. You'll have players showing up to play it like any other 1-5, wanting to play level 4 and 5 PCs, and then one or two people show up with level 1s ready to replay, who can't bring a higher PC even if they have one. If the high tier folks outnumber the replay folks, then those level 1s are likely to die.

Alternatively, you play 'Level 1 Keep-Away' and HOPE like heck they don't take damage.

May have played the L1 in this situation a few times...

3/5 *

This was more of a matter of trying to figure out the following:

A) Does the 'level 1' for replayability rely on the level of the character played, or the level of the character the credit is applied to? The latter rather than the former seems perhaps more sensible for intent, bit this is currently the only scenario/quest series that the distinction has meaning for, so it is new territory.

And

B) There has been a lot of discussion over whether you calculate APL with pregens taken into account, or if you calculate APL first and then pregens must be played that fall into the subtier of the APL (if they exist). If the latter is the case, then I would not be able to play a level 1 pregen, as APL would dictate I have to play a 4th level pregen instead (which, depending on the result of A, might not be possible for me). Hence the question of if I could even be allowed to play a level 1 pregen (or if I need to have an original level 1)?

3/5 *

Wei Ji the Learner wrote:
Fromper wrote:


Agree with Muse that your second scenario is no different than playing any other adventure.

The first problem is unique to this adventure, though. Because it's 1-5, but allows replays only at level 1, I can imagine we'll see this a lot. You'll have players showing up to play it like any other 1-5, wanting to play level 4 and 5 PCs, and then one or two people show up with level 1s ready to replay, who can't bring a higher PC even if they have one. If the high tier folks outnumber the replay folks, then those level 1s are likely to die.

Alternatively, you play 'Level 1 Keep-Away' and HOPE like heck they don't take damage.

May have played the L1 in this situation a few times...

In all fairness, my very first game was in a 4-5 tier party while I had a shiny new sorceror who liked to play scout for the party. The only damage he took all game was falling off a rope he was trying to climb down (forgot to secure rope around body and/or take 10). He DID get cursed and had to spend his first 2 pp to have it removed however.

Sovereign Court 5/5

DrakeRoberts wrote:

This was more of a matter of trying to figure out the following:

A) Does the 'level 1' for replayability rely on the level of the character played, or the level of the character the credit is applied to? The latter rather than the former seems perhaps more sensible for intent, bit this is currently the only scenario/quest series that the distinction has meaning for, so it is new territory.

And

B) There has been a lot of discussion over whether you calculate APL with pregens taken into account, or if you calculate APL first and then pregens must be played that fall into the subtier of the APL (if they exist). If the latter is the case, then I would not be able to play a level 1 pregen, as APL would dictate I have to play a 4th level pregen instead (which, depending on the result of A, might not be possible for me). Hence the question of if I could even be allowed to play a level 1 pregen (or if I need to have an original level 1)?

Take a Iconic (level 1) write up, and with a pencil add a letter Y on the end of the name... and you have an original level 1.

You may want to re-write it again later... but heck, you can do that.

1/5 5/5

Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber

My bard's first adventure was in a scenario with a spawn-creating undead. One can imagine the pants-load-dropping when the party realized "Oh, crud, we have to keep them away from 'x' or we'll be fighting TWO of them!"

His second adventure he was doing good until the party ran into something that he would not have survived, and the guide assigned to the party realized that and put him in a safe place.

However, much as I tell a lot of people, level doesn't mean that much *sometimes*

We were playing a 1-5 at one point, 3 of us(We weren't sure but tried to go without the +1 pregen for GM sanity). After the first encounter we not only picked up our 'intern', we also hired 'local muscle'.

3/5 *

Muse. wrote:
DrakeRoberts wrote:

This was more of a matter of trying to figure out the following:

A) Does the 'level 1' for replayability rely on the level of the character played, or the level of the character the credit is applied to? The latter rather than the former seems perhaps more sensible for intent, bit this is currently the only scenario/quest series that the distinction has meaning for, so it is new territory.

And

B) There has been a lot of discussion over whether you calculate APL with pregens taken into account, or if you calculate APL first and then pregens must be played that fall into the subtier of the APL (if they exist). If the latter is the case, then I would not be able to play a level 1 pregen, as APL would dictate I have to play a 4th level pregen instead (which, depending on the result of A, might not be possible for me). Hence the question of if I could even be allowed to play a level 1 pregen (or if I need to have an original level 1)?

Take a Iconic (level 1) write up, and with a pencil add a letter Y on the end of the name... and you have an original level 1.

You may want to re-write it again later... but heck, you can do that.

Well most pregens aren't legal as-is for new characters, because of wealth spent anyhow. But I can always remake one in a more legal fashion, yes.

Sovereign Court 5/5

DrakeRoberts wrote:
Muse. wrote:
DrakeRoberts wrote:

This was more of a matter of trying to figure out the following:

A) Does the 'level 1' for replayability rely on the level of the character played, or the level of the character the credit is applied to? The latter rather than the former seems perhaps more sensible for intent, bit this is currently the only scenario/quest series that the distinction has meaning for, so it is new territory.

And

B) There has been a lot of discussion over whether you calculate APL with pregens taken into account, or if you calculate APL first and then pregens must be played that fall into the subtier of the APL (if they exist). If the latter is the case, then I would not be able to play a level 1 pregen, as APL would dictate I have to play a 4th level pregen instead (which, depending on the result of A, might not be possible for me). Hence the question of if I could even be allowed to play a level 1 pregen (or if I need to have an original level 1)?

Take a Iconic (level 1) write up, and with a pencil add a letter Y on the end of the name... and you have an original level 1.

You may want to re-write it again later... but heck, you can do that.

Well most pregens aren't legal as-is for new characters, because of wealth spent anyhow. But I can always remake one in a more legal fashion, yes.

??? Sorry what?

I beleave almost all (all that I know of) of the Pregens are legal for gold spent on equipment. I tend to telll people who have just put a PC together to just grab all the equipment from a Pregen... that way they know they haven't spent to much and are legal, and are ready to start in 5 minutes.

Which ones did you think weren't legal on money?

3/5 *

Muse. wrote:
DrakeRoberts wrote:
Muse. wrote:
DrakeRoberts wrote:

This was more of a matter of trying to figure out the following:

A) Does the 'level 1' for replayability rely on the level of the character played, or the level of the character the credit is applied to? The latter rather than the former seems perhaps more sensible for intent, bit this is currently the only scenario/quest series that the distinction has meaning for, so it is new territory.

And

B) There has been a lot of discussion over whether you calculate APL with pregens taken into account, or if you calculate APL first and then pregens must be played that fall into the subtier of the APL (if they exist). If the latter is the case, then I would not be able to play a level 1 pregen, as APL would dictate I have to play a 4th level pregen instead (which, depending on the result of A, might not be possible for me). Hence the question of if I could even be allowed to play a level 1 pregen (or if I need to have an original level 1)?

Take a Iconic (level 1) write up, and with a pencil add a letter Y on the end of the name... and you have an original level 1.

You may want to re-write it again later... but heck, you can do that.

Well most pregens aren't legal as-is for new characters, because of wealth spent anyhow. But I can always remake one in a more legal fashion, yes.

??? Sorry what?

I beleave almost all (all that I know of) of the Pregens are legal for gold spent on equipment. I tend to telll people who have just put a PC together to just grab all the equipment from a Pregen... that way they know they haven't spent to much and are legal, and are ready to start in 5 minutes.

Which ones did you think weren't legal on money?

A number of them have like partial charged clw wands and what not, don't they?

Scarab Sages 4/5

Some of the newer ones do, I think. There are a few that are illegal due to mistakes in building the character. Weapon Focus at 1st with no +1 BAB, Spellstrike at 1st, and things like that.

Silver Crusade 4/5

I believe the barbarian has an archetype that isn't legal in PFS, which is how she gets the large sword.

And of course, the kineticist is below the minimum age for a PFS PC. Though I do know someone who managed to make a PFS legal version of that kineticist, so she could keep playing her after liking the pregen.

How she did it:
She's a gnome with amnesia and a hat of disguise. She honestly believes she's a human child. Because she'd played the pregen and applied credit to the PC, she started with enough gold and fame for the hat right off the bat.

Scarab Sages 4/5

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Amiri doesn't have an Archetype. She just takes the normal penalty. She's got EWP: Bastard Sword, so she can wield one one-handed, which means she can wield a large one two-handed.

1/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.

crowe's armor is more expensive now

Sovereign Court 5/5

DrakeRoberts wrote:
Muse. wrote:
DrakeRoberts wrote:
Muse. wrote:
DrakeRoberts wrote:

This was more of a matter of trying to figure out the following:

A) Does the 'level 1' for replayability rely on the level of the character played, or the level of the character the credit is applied to? The latter rather than the former seems perhaps more sensible for intent, bit this is currently the only scenario/quest series that the distinction has meaning for, so it is new territory.

And

B) There has been a lot of discussion over whether you calculate APL with pregens taken into account, or if you calculate APL first and then pregens must be played that fall into the subtier of the APL (if they exist). If the latter is the case, then I would not be able to play a level 1 pregen, as APL would dictate I have to play a 4th level pregen instead (which, depending on the result of A, might not be possible for me). Hence the question of if I could even be allowed to play a level 1 pregen (or if I need to have an original level 1)?

Take a Iconic (level 1) write up, and with a pencil add a letter Y on the end of the name... and you have an original level 1.

You may want to re-write it again later... but heck, you can do that.

Well most pregens aren't legal as-is for new characters, because of wealth spent anyhow. But I can always remake one in a more legal fashion, yes.

??? Sorry what?

I beleave almost all (all that I know of) of the Pregens are legal for gold spent on equipment. I tend to telll people who have just put a PC together to just grab all the equipment from a Pregen... that way they know they haven't spent to much and are legal, and are ready to start in 5 minutes.

Which ones did you think weren't legal on money?

A number of them have like partial charged clw wands and what not, don't they?

At 1st level? None that I know of... which ones have partly charged wands of anything at 1st level? Any?

The only partial wands I have seen on starting PCs are on players who got the Beginers Boon that gives a CLW wand with 5 charges - but that's on a PC, not on an Iconic.

So, I'm guessing that most of the Iconics are 1st level legal to play as a PC. Some are even CORE legal to play....

Sovereign Court 5/5

Ferious Thune wrote:
Some of the newer ones do, I think. There are a few that are illegal due to mistakes in building the character. Weapon Focus at 1st with no +1 BAB, Spellstrike at 1st, and things like that.

Do you know which ones? I'd like to pull them from my folder so I don't use them as "Build Templates"....

1/5

the barb has two combat traits
the bloodrager's armor is too expensive so he's over his money limit now
the magus has spellstrike at lv1
investigator has weapon focus at lv1
those are the ones off the top of my head.

Silver Crusade 4/5

And as mentioned above, the kineticist is below the minimum age limit. You can't play a human child (small sized) in PFS.

Scarab Sages 4/5

I feel like the Arcanist might have a partial wand. I don't have her character sheet handy. I also think the Warpriest might have a partial CLW wand. I'll check them in the morning, if no one has verified or proven it incorrect by then.

Also, since someone mentioned a potential archetype earlier, to my knowledge, none of the pregens have any archetypes whatsoever. I'm pretty sure they are all meant to showcase the base version of the class.

4/5 ****

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Lem has an illegal potion of expeditious retreat.

3/5 *

DrakeRoberts wrote:

This was more of a matter of trying to figure out the following:

A) Does the 'level 1' for replayability rely on the level of the character played, or the level of the character the credit is applied to? The latter rather than the former seems perhaps more sensible for intent, bit this is currently the only scenario/quest series that the distinction has meaning for, so it is new territory.

And

B) There has been a lot of discussion over whether you calculate APL with pregens taken into account, or if you calculate APL first and then pregens must be played that fall into the subtier of the APL (if they exist). If the latter is the case, then I would not be able to play a level 1 pregen, as APL would dictate I have to play a 4th level pregen instead (which, depending on the result of A, might not be possible for me). Hence the question of if I could even be allowed to play a level 1 pregen (or if I need to have an original level 1)?

Sorry, just wanted to redirect this thread back to the original point. Thanks!

Silver Crusade 5/5 5/55/5 **** Venture-Captain, Germany—Bavaria

Thomas pretty much gave the correct answer in his post directly after yours.
That said, if you don't play someone who charges into melee, it is very survivable.

The Exchange 5/5

Ferious Thune wrote:

I feel like the Arcanist might have a partial wand. I don't have her character sheet handy. I also think the Warpriest might have a partial CLW wand. I'll check them in the morning, if no one has verified or proven it incorrect by then.

Also, since someone mentioned a potential archetype earlier, to my knowledge, none of the pregens have any archetypes whatsoever. I'm pretty sure they are all meant to showcase the base version of the class.

1st level Arcanist gear: Combat Gear acid; Other Gear spell component pouch (2), wand of mage armor (5 charges), backpack, waterskin, spellbook (contains all 0th-level spells; all prepared 1st-level spells plus comprehend languages, disguise self, enlarge person, expeditious retreat, grease, liberating commandUC, mount, protection from evil, and unseen servant), 2 gp

1st level Warpriest gear: Combat Gear acid, scroll of cure light wounds; Other Gear four-mirror armorUC, greatsword, sling with 10 bullets, backpack, iron holy symbol of Gorum, spell component pouch, waterskin, 6 gp 9 sp

Did the price of four-mirror armor change in Errata? if so, then the Warpriest may be over spent on starting equipment.

Grand Lodge 2/5

Fromper wrote:
claudekennilol wrote:

That's the problem with this scenario. We can get a 5, 3, 4, 3,...and a 1. The guy with the 1 has already "played up" on it so he's stuck at level 1.

Or we could get five people that show up with a level 1 and then a sixth person that shows up with a level 5--and apparently at that point I as the gm am supposed to tell them that they shouldn't play the character they planned/brought with them.

The first problem is unique to this adventure, though. Because it's 1-5, but allows replays only at level 1, I can imagine we'll see this a lot. You'll have players showing up to play it like any other 1-5, wanting to play level 4 and 5 PCs, and then one or two people show up with level 1s ready to replay, who can't bring a higher PC even if they have one. If the high tier folks outnumber the replay folks, then those level 1s are likely to die.

This is the point I'm trying to make. It's replayable, but not really. You're shoe-horned into not playing, or playing a level 1 with a table of five levels fives. In every other game (i.e. games that aren't replayable) you have the option of playing a pregen in tier (unless 10-11).

Sczarni 5/5 5/55/5 ***

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Back on topic...

I may be missing something here, but why can't you replay with a 4th Level Pregen?

It's the credit that matters. So long as the Chronicle is applied to a 1st level PC and the gold reduced to 500gp, you've met the requirements for replay.

Right?

ADDED: because the character that the credit is being applied to is decided before the game begins, there's no way it'll be applied to anything higher than 1st level.

Grand Lodge 2/5

Nefreet wrote:

Back on topic...

I may be missing something here, but why can't you replay with a 4th Level Pregen?

It's the credit that matters. So long as the Chronicle is applied to a 1st level PC and the gold reduced to 500gp, you've met the requirements for replay.

Right?

What gives you the impression that he's allowed to play with a level 4 even though he's already "played up" previously in the scenario?

Nefreet wrote:
ADDED: because the character that the credit is being applied to is decided before the game begins, there's no way it'll be applied to anything higher than 1st level.

But he's already played up so he can't play up. Let's say there were level 2 pregens, does that mean I could replay level 2 in all of the 1-2 evergreens as long as I write on the chronicle that it's for a first level character? I don't see that logic going at all.

Sczarni 5/5 5/55/5 ***

There are no Level 2 Pregens, so that logic doesn't work.

1/5 5/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber

The easiest fixes would have folks out with pitchforks and torches in seconds, I'm sure.

A. Change it to a L1 Evergreen and that's that.

B. Remove the replayability at L1.

C. Make it completely replayable at all levels rather than trying to shoehorn it into a thing that's not a thing...

Grand Lodge 2/5

Nefreet wrote:
There are no Level 2 Pregens, so that logic doesn't work.

Right, but there are level 4 pregens, and that's the exact same scenario. The answer is he can't play with a level 4 pregen for the same reason I wouldn't be able to keep replaying a 1-2 with a hypothetical level 2 pregen.

It's only playable once outside of level 1, he's hit that threshold--pregen or no, he's stuck at level 1.

p.s. You can't take a hypothetical situation and dismiss it as not applicable because it's hypothetical and then include the word logic in your reasoning.

Wei Ji the Learner wrote:
C. Make it completely replayable at all levels rather than trying to shoehorn it into a thing that's not a thing...

Exactly, I was flabbergasted when I heard that this was a thing for exactly this situation. It's not inclusive and creates wide gaps in the level range which is something the guide tries to explicitly make not happen.

Scarab Sages 4/5

Nefreet wrote:

Back on topic...

I may be missing something here, but why can't you replay with a 4th Level Pregen?

It's the credit that matters. So long as the Chronicle is applied to a 1st level PC and the gold reduced to 500gp, you've met the requirements for replay.

Right?

ADDED: because the character that the credit is being applied to is decided before the game begins, there's no way it'll be applied to anything higher than 1st level.

The character the credit is being applied to is decided before the game, but not necessarily whether they are going to apply the chronicle immediately (dropping gold to 500), or if they are going to hold it until they are level 4. Clearly, they wouldn't be able to hold it and apply it at level 4, because then you would have two characters above 1st level with a chronicle sheet for the scenario.

I'm unclear about whether playing a 4th level pregen and assigning reduced credit immediately to a 1st level character is allowed. I don't see the harm in it, but I'm not confident it's 100% legal at this time.

Personally, I'm in the camp that just wants it to be replayable for all levels, but unfortunately, it is not currently.

Sczarni 5/5 5/55/5 ***

I don't see any issues.

In fact, you're actually *required* under some circumstances to use a 4th level Pregen, since Pregens are determined after APL is calculated.

If only a 3, a 4 and a 5 show up, you have to select a 4th level Pregen, because the subtier is 4-5.

Regardless of whether that Pregen is played by the GM or a 4th person.

The Exchange 5/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Let's take a look at something that IS replayable with a 4th (or 7th) level Iconic.

8-07 Tomb of R.R. would allow you to replay using 4th level Iconics. You could then lower the GP to 500 and assign the CR to a 1st level PC, correct?

House requires you to put any replays (past one play above level 1) on a 1st level PC... so why can't you run a 4th level Iconic (or even the hypothetical level 2 Iconic), as long as you reduce the GP. to 500 and assign it to a 1st level PC?

[sarcasm]Clearly that has to be prohibited! otherwise players will be DOING IT![/sarcasm]...

Heck, best way to fix this? remove it from the Replayable list.

And people wonder why we can't have nice things...

The Exchange 5/5

Wei Ji the Learner wrote:


The easiest fixes would have folks out with pitchforks and torches in seconds, I'm sure.

A. Change it to a L1 Evergreen and that's that.

B. Remove the replayability at L1.

C. Make it completely replayable at all levels rather than trying to shoehorn it into a thing that's not a thing...

Easiest fix? is B. Remove it from the replayable list.

1/5 5/5

Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber

Easiest fix, imo?

C: Make it completely replayable at all levels rather than trying to shoehorn it into a thing that's not a thing.

Subsequent results from Tome of Righteous Repose have indicated that it hasn't been the destabilizing factor it was feared to be.

Grand Lodge 2/5

Nefreet wrote:
In fact, you're actually *required* under some circumstances to use a 4th level Pregen, since Pregens are determined after APL is calculated.

That's not true and is also a topic for another conversation.

The current guide includes no such language that says that. We've been told by those that have influenced the guide that the original language said as much, but either through editing failures or deliberate deletions that language wasn't included.

That may be true once the season 9 guide comes out, but currently that simply isn't the case.

Sczarni 5/5 5/55/5 ***

I disagree, and I guess we'll leave it at that.

1/5

I say no, if you're replaying it you need to replay as a level one, just giving credit to a lv1 isn't replaying at lv1.

Sczarni 5/5 5/55/5 ***

Coincidentally, I was slotted to GM this tonight. Those plans were cancelled last night when we found out we only had two players, but it's good to know that this ambiguity exists going forward.

Question for those who say "no": if a player sits down at your table (not this scenario) with a 1st level Chronicle from replaying with a 4th level Pregen, what would you do?

The Exchange 5/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Nefreet wrote:

Coincidentally, I was slotted to GM this tonight. Those plans were cancelled last night when we found out we only had two players, but it's good to know that this ambiguity exists going forward.

Question for those who say "no": if a player sits down at your table (not this scenario) with a 1st level Chronicle from replaying with a 4th level Pregen, what would you do?

say "no" to what?

from this scenario? I have no idea.

Actually I do have an idea what I would do. I would never notice. I'd miss it completely. That's not something I spend game time checking on.

1/5

Nefreet wrote:

Coincidentally, I was slotted to GM this tonight. Those plans were cancelled last night when we found out we only had two players, but it's good to know that this ambiguity exists going forward.

Question for those who say "no": if a player sits down at your table (not this scenario) with a 1st level Chronicle from replaying with a 4th level Pregen, what would you do?

There is enough disagreement and enough room for interpretation that I accept the variance and rulings of other GMs.

Grand Lodge 4/5 5/55/55/55/5 ***** Venture-Agent, Minnesota

10 people marked this as a favorite.

Honestly, I'd let them play the fourth level pregen but apply it to the first level character. Aren't we over thinking this?

Hmm

Sovereign Court 5/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Hilary Moon Murphy wrote:

Honestly, I'd let them play the fourth level pregen but apply it to the first level character. Aren't we over thinking this?

Hmm

"Allan Quatermain: This is Africa, dear boy. Sweating is what we do."

[paraphrase]"This is the PFS board, dear boy. Over thinking it is what we do."[/paraphrase]

Grand Lodge 2/5

Hilary Moon Murphy wrote:

Honestly, I'd let them play the fourth level pregen but apply it to the first level character. Aren't we over thinking this?

Hmm

I would, too, but I would be cheating and doing it knowingly.

The Exchange 5/5

Wei Ji the Learner wrote:


Easiest fix, imo?

C: Make it completely replayable at all levels rather than trying to shoehorn it into a thing that's not a thing.

Subsequent results from Tome of Righteous Repose have indicated that it hasn't been the destabilizing factor it was feared to be.

this would make it different from all other Tier 1-5 scenarios...

Unless we then just throw all Tier 1-5 scenarios open to unlimited replays?

The easiest fix would be to bring it back in line with all the other Tier 1-5 scenarios, by removing the replay options on it. Then it has no "special exception rules" and is treated exactly like all other scenarios.

Silver Crusade 4/5 5/55/55/5

Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path, Maps, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Maps Subscriber
Jane "The Knife" wrote:
Wei Ji the Learner wrote:


Easiest fix, imo?

C: Make it completely replayable at all levels rather than trying to shoehorn it into a thing that's not a thing.

Subsequent results from Tome of Righteous Repose have indicated that it hasn't been the destabilizing factor it was feared to be.

this would make it different from all other Tier 1-5 scenarios...

Unless we then just throw all Tier 1-5 scenarios open to unlimited replays?

The easiest fix would be to bring it back in line with all the other Tier 1-5 scenarios, by removing the replay options on it. Then it has no "special exception rules" and is treated exactly like all other scenarios.

Even if you remove the replayability, it's still going to be way different from any other 1-5 scenario in existence. It'll still be a series of quests playable over multiple sessions where the subtier played doesn't affect the gold awarded.

Grand Lodge 4/5

Or we wait for the new Guide to hopefully clarify how much of the tier 1-2 evergreen rules apply to this scenario.

51 to 96 of 96 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Organized Play / Pathfinder Society / House of Harmonious Wisdom Replayability? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in Pathfinder Society