
![]() |

This stubby-looking crossbow has a cup-like attachment rather than a groove for a bolt. It is designed to launch splash weapons. Loading a launching crossbow is a full-round action.
Starting at 5th level, a bolt ace can select one specific type of crossbow, such as hand crossbow or heavy crossbow. She gains a bonus on damage rolls equal to her Dexterity modifier with that crossbow. Furthermore, when she scores a critical hit with that type of crossbow, her critical modifier increases by 1 (a x2 becomes a x3, for example).
All alchemists gain the Throw Anything feat as a bonus feat at 1st level. An alchemist adds his Intelligence modifier to damage done with splash weapons, including the splash damage if any. This bonus damage is already included in the bomb class feature.
Though this may be a bit wonky, but let us say you have a finely crafted Alchemist's Fire that you finely crafted yourself. You placed this finely crafted Alchemist's Fire into you finely-looking Launching Crossbow. You then take that finely-looking Launching Crossbow, loaded with your finely crafted Alchemist's Fire, and you shoot it to the face of the not so finely-looking monstrosity.
Long story short, would you get both your Dexterity and Intelligence to the damage dealt with an x3 to Damage on a critical?

![]() |

So, it seems that the launching crossbow needs some clarifications, and this is definitely in GM territory.
The crossbow itself has no damage or crit entries. Instead it's supposed to use the splash weapon damage. So, some GM's might rule against this. However, I'm personally in favor, from a rules perspective.
It's powerful though, with an offset of having really expensive ammunition. 1 Alchemist, 19 Bolt Ace would be scary, but all this trick needs is 5 Bolt Ace, 1 Alchemist X whatever.

![]() |

My Bolt Ace will eventually be grabbing one of these as well, though he won't be dipping into Alchemist.
I hadn't considered arguments against Dex to damage, or that the crit range might not be expanded. I was reading the abilities at face value.
Luckily, it's not core to his build, so I suppose if I encounter a GM that disallows it, I won't be that hurt for effectiveness.