a Hilariously stupid Feat- Technophobe

[Pendagast]

Has anyone read technophobe?

requires entry: power attack, improved sunder.
applies bonuses after killing a robot or destroying a tech item…limited by your wisdom bonus for duration…

so this is a feat for clerics?

this wis bonus thing seems really dumb for a two feat tax entry.

[Alleran]

I don't see a rules query?

And it would also work as a feat for druids (WIS-based casting) who like to wild shape and melee it up.

[Pendagast]

Alleran wrote:

I don't see a rules query?

And it would also work as a feat for druids (WIS-based casting) who like to wild shape and melee it up.

whats it meant for?

why's it like that?

did the designer forget power attack is required for improved sunder?

its three feats to get a situational bonus that fizzles out for most characters who might take it in one round,

Druids are really going to take things like power attack and improved sunder for any other reason,
characters that would aren't going to have much wisdom
why is it wisdom based?

what am i missing?

[Rynjin]

Breaking news: There's a Feat that sucks ass.

At 11: Prone Shooter? Who thought this was necessary?

[FuelDrop]

What does it mean? There's a deeper meaning in all this. I suspect it's related to the spread of boy bands and aglets.

[That Crazy Alchemist]

Not all feats are created equal. This is more of a "flavor" feat meant to be taken by non-powergamers in a robot-heavy campaign. Honestly this would have probably been more appropriate as a Trait than a Feat given its flavor and lack of power.

[Chris Lambertz]

Locking. It might be a good idea to start out with a less baiting title.