
Alzrius |
So I was in link-freefall across the web, and somehow ended up in this pastebin, where the writer asserts that:
I have a friend that works at Paizo, creators of Pathfinder, who complained that their new "iconic character" - a sort of example for whatever new character class is getting a book - was a very hamfisted attempt at pandering to the trans community. This friend is trans herself, and her complaints led to her losing her job.
I really hope that this isn't true. Can anyone shed any light on this?

Calex |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

I doubt you'll get any kind of official response. No company of any type would discuss its firing/let go of any ex-employee due to privacy reasons. Unless the person themselves come forward, and even then they would probably get locked out pretty quick. I'm not saying this just for Paizo- ANY company would probably do this. It would be a legal and P.R. minefield otherwise.

thejeff |
I doubt you'll get any kind of official response. No company of any type would discuss its firing/let go of any ex-employee due to privacy reasons. Unless the person themselves come forward, and even then they would probably get locked out pretty quick. I'm not saying this just for Paizo- ANY company would probably do this. It would be a legal and P.R. minefield otherwise.
Unless it's complete bull. In which case someone might say something.
Like "We don't know what this random blogger with a chip against SJW is talking about. We haven't fired anyone since the trans iconic was revealed."
Seriously, I wouldn't pay any attention to this unless some more info comes out. It doesn't match what we know of Paizo. The iconic was created by Crystal, who is trans, which makes the accusation of "a very hamfisted attempt at pandering to the trans community" kind of odd. The blogger definitely has a chip on his shoulder about SJW and such things. It's a friend of a friend story at best. Hardly a reliable source.

James Sutter Managing Editor |
28 people marked this as a favorite. |

That is absolutely not true.
While Calex is right that we don't discuss why anyone is let go, let alone our employees' gender/sexuality/etc. (talk about a breach of confidentiality!), to my knowledge this claim is completely baseless.
That said, I *do* challenge anyone to read Crystal's awesome write-up of Shardra and call it hamfisted. She did a rad job.
EDIT: When I say we don't discuss our employees' personal details, I mean as a company. Many of us at Paizo are pretty publicly GLBTQwhatever, and if individuals want to talk about it, that's totally cool. :)

Drejk |

Didn't one of th employees of Paizo leave the company just before the iconic went public? Seems I remember this person talking about that in the LGBT thread
Well, one know trans employee left Paizo recently... The catch is it was Crystal herself, the creator of the trans iconic write-up in question - who left to pursue freelance career (or so she said). I don't think that she was fired for complaining about "pandering to trans community" that she wrote herself. *insert a condescending look from behind glasses toward the author of the "news"*
Has anyone else except her and Sean left recently?
EDIT: Vanishing posts... Vanishing posts...

thunderspirit |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

That said, I *do* challenge anyone to read Crystal's awesome write-up of Shardra and call it hamfisted. She did a rad job.
I don't know that this could be said any better.
Shardra's backstory is about as hamfisted as a vegan salad.
I stand (well, okay, sit) corrected.*
While not necessarily written better, Mikaze's is more succinct than Sutter's, and made me laugh out loud. But then, I'm easy. :-)

Drejk |
7 people marked this as a favorite. |

This is absolutely, categorically untrue.
No employee has even left the company since we published our trans iconic, so the theory is nonsense on its face.
Hypothesis... Story... Factoid... Blatant lie. But not theory!
*sigh*
Sorry, but misuse of the term theory is slowly joining my pet peeves list :/

Alzrius |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
No employee has even left the company since we published our trans iconic, so the theory is nonsense on its face.
But perhaps there was an employee who left sometime between the conceptualization of the character and its publication, and that would explain...wait...
*checks*
Doggone it, which one of you jokers put this tinfoil hat on my head again?!
Seriously though, it's nice to have this so quickly and thoroughly debunked. Nothing more to see here, people! Carry on!

![]() |
4 people marked this as a favorite. |

Terquem wrote:Didn't one of th employees of Paizo leave the company just before the iconic went public? Seems I remember this person talking about that in the LGBT threadWell, one know trans employee left Paizo recently... The catch is it was Crystal herself
! Wha-?
:(
- who left to pursue freelance career
:)
keeps an eye out
Crystal's good people. Always been friendly and informative, her IC Imrijka posts were a hoot, her art is insanely cute, and she drew one of my creature entries for Wayfinder. :D
Best of luck out there, Crystal!

![]() |
35 people marked this as a favorite. |

That is absolutely not true.
While Calex is right that we don't discuss why anyone is let go, let alone our employees' gender/sexuality/etc. (talk about a breach of confidentiality!), to my knowledge this claim is completely baseless.
That said, I *do* challenge anyone to read Crystal's awesome write-up of Shardra and call it hamfisted. She did a rad job.
EDIT: When I say we don't discuss our employees' personal details, I mean as a company. Many of us at Paizo are pretty publicly GLBTQwhatever, and if individuals want to talk about it, that's totally cool. :)
Sutter tells the truth on this: I am rad.
only two people left Paizo in between Shardra being conceptualized and now, and I'm the only woman or trans person. This claim from "Little Mac" is 100% a lie. I am (to the best of my knowledge) the only trans woman who has left Paizo. Ever. And I left for a variety of personal and professional reasons (the fact that I'm still contributing to the boards and still writing and mapping for them means there's no bad blood and I didn't leave over something petty), none of which involved me being fired for complaining the company was too PC or that trans inclusion was "hamfisted."
I wrote Shardra myself. And every trans person I've seen feedback from about the character has been ecstatic about her (and believe me, I am an egomaniac so I have been stalking a LOT of blogs and forums since her release to see what people say about her). The only people who've expressed any "concern" that she exists just to pander to the transgender community have been a teensy, tiny minority of straight males who show the same kind of "concern" that feminism hurts women and racial justice holds all black people back, and who bemoan the blight of "fake geek girls" ruin the community. Not people whose opinion on the subject seems especially informed.
Checking through the original Pastebin post for more context, it's all either false or so vague it doesn't matter. Nothing in this rant is worth responding to, especially if the rest of it is as accurate as his comments on Paizo.

![]() |
6 people marked this as a favorite. |
This post honestly has me fairly angry. This random anonymous jerk is trying to use me as a handpuppet to undermine my own efforts at inclusion.
I've been reading up on GamerGate recently, you've become the latest victim of the pushback against gaming that doesn't specifically cater to the undersexed boys who up until now had the privileged lions share of attention from the gaming industry. They see the progressive wave of gaming as a decrease in the monopoly of attention they've enjoyed up to now.
They could and just might be doing far worse to you right now, if you were more publicly known.

KestrelZ |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

On a tangent, when will we have a write up of the iconic stats from APG, ACG, UM, and UC?
I hope someone is starting to work on the NPC codex 2 (though monster one sounds good as well).