Geez, it was just a thought experiment. Give the guy a break.
I don't think it is a great idea but an on call mediation service might be kind of cool. It wouldn't be official but it could help diffuse some rough experiences during a game by taking the decision out of the hands of the two parties involved.
In my best Sean Connery voice:
"Five nos followed by a yes is still a yes."
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
If you think fans get a sense of entitlement that their concerns be answered immediately now, man imagine if they paid directly for it? It would be madness on the boards. I cant even imagine a situation where paizo would want to do this.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Geez, it was just a thought experiment. Give the guy a break.
I don't think it is a great idea but an on call mediation service might be kind of cool. It wouldn't be official but it could help diffuse some rough experiences during a game by taking the decision out of the hands of the two parties involved.
I dont know what kind of decisions you need to take in your games but in my game the GM make a ruling and then after the game we may look it up( i most likely will any way). If we needed to call an adult for that sort of things i think we would have bigger problems.
This is like asking for people to pay for patches when software developers release buggy software. As far as I'm concerned it's the developers duty to their customer to release FAQ, Errata, and whatever else is necessary to fix their product.
