
lemeres |

yeah, as Blkbloodtroll said, Soft cover or partial cover. I would also take a gander at how a tower shield works and what non-proficiency and improvised does to that...
You take the armor check penalty on your attack rolls. So maybe treating it like a tower shield might be fair since it helps to show how hard it is to deal with dead bodies (they have a -10 ACP), plus it has another -2 to attack rolls due to tower shield rules. The actual bonuses to AC are the same as soft cover anyway.
Although I might wave the nonproficiency thing if they could normally use tower shields. I think the training would be close enough to work, and it gives the party fighter a way to show off.

Odraude |

Actually most of the 'things not covered by the rules' can be covered by a +1 or +2 circumstance bonus that the CRB tells GMs to apply when it makes sense to.
Can you show me the page number to that? I was trying to find it earlier to prove a point, but I honestly couldn't. Thanks!

Bruunwald |

Skylancer4 wrote:Actually most of the 'things not covered by the rules' can be covered by a +1 or +2 circumstance bonus that the CRB tells GMs to apply when it makes sense to.Can you show me the page number to that? I was trying to find it earlier to prove a point, but I honestly couldn't. Thanks!
Page 403 of the CRB calls it the Fiat Rule:
One handy rule to keep under your belt is the Fiat Rule—simply grant a player a +2 or a –2 bonus or penalty to a die roll if no one at the table is precisely sure how a situation might be handled by the rules.
This is a carry-over from the 3.5 DMG which called this the "DM's best friend."

Skylancer4 |

I agree that it should be used, and am happy it is there, but you shouldn't really give it out too often. It think of it as a "reward" for quick/out of the box thinking and don't give it again after the situation is resolved. Giving it out too often makes the players expect it or rely on it and they can feel slighted when you don't give it to them.
I would honestly not even tell them you are applying it, mentally applying it as a penalty against whoever/whatever they are confronted with.

![]() |

Hi,
I've come across an interesting situation where the player wants to use a corpse as a meat shield against archers and I did not see anything in the core book that would cover that...
Now, I would like to know your opinion as to how to rule this...
I can answer that question. From 5-02 The Wardstone Patrol:
During Combat The "blank" telepathically command the
two armed humans to attack the PCs. The demons then
approach, wielding the barely-conscious peasants’ bodies as
shields to gain partial cover...
Now, can someone tell me how to put that Spoiler/Hide button on my next post that may give away something in a scenario?