| Lucas Hennes |
So I'm running Rise of the Runelords AE for my group, and we've recently gotten into a debate over the Favored Son/Daughter trait. The trait, among other cool things, gives "an additional 10% over the amount of gp you normally would get from selling off treasure." What I've been interpreting this as is a 1000 gold item, which would normally sell for 500 gold, gives an additional 10% gold, so it would sell for 550. A few of the party members are claiming that "additional" means the item should sell for 10% more than 50%, so 60% (or 600 gold).
At this point in the discussion, I'm very tempted to just say "I'm the GM and I say 55%" but I wanted to ask the forums first. Has anyone had this question before?
| seebs |
It's certainly ambiguous. I would actually tend to read that one as 60%. Here's why:
10% more => 110% of X
Additional 10% => there is an existing percentage somewhere, add 10 to it.
So 10% more would be do the computation, add 10%. Additional 10% means that since it's normally 50%, there's 50% plus 10%, which is 60%.
Aberrant Templar
|
The trait, among other cool things, gives "an additional 10% over the amount of gp you normally would get from selling off treasure." What I've been interpreting this as is a 1000 gold item, which would normally sell for 500 gold, gives an additional 10% gold, so it would sell for 550. A few of the party members are claiming that "additional" means the item should sell for 10% more than 50%, so 60% (or 600 gold).
Your interpretation is correct. Despite the "could be clearer" wording, you just add the extra 10% in as a bonus at the end.
Selling an item for 60% instead of 50% is a bit outside the power level of a trait (which should ~1/2 the strength of a feat).
Aberrant Templar
|
Actually, now that I've read the trait it seems less ambiguous (and gives you something you can point to when justifying your decision to your players). The exact wording is:
"...you gain an additional 10% over the amount of gp you normally would get from selling off treasure"
I bolded the important part, because it proves your example correct.
If you sell a 1,000gp item, you would normally get 500gp. With this trait, you gain an additional 10% over the amount you would normally get (500gp). That would leave you with 550gp, like you said.
The "60% instead of 50%" reading would not work as written, since 600gp is more than 10%.
You don't have to say "I'm right because I'm the DM". You can just say "I'm right because math." :-)
| Gilfalas |
So I'm running Rise of the Runelords AE for my group, and we've recently gotten into a debate over the Favored Son/Daughter trait. The trait, among other cool things, gives "an additional 10% over the amount of gp you normally would get from selling off treasure." What I've been interpreting this as is a 1000 gold item, which would normally sell for 500 gold, gives an additional 10% gold, so it would sell for 550. A few of the party members are claiming that "additional" means the item should sell for 10% more than 50%, so 60% (or 600 gold).
At this point in the discussion, I'm very tempted to just say "I'm the GM and I say 55%" but I wanted to ask the forums first. Has anyone had this question before?
Lucas you have ruled correctly. It says they get 10% over WHAT THEY WOULD NORMALLY GET. Not 10% over what they would normally PAY For that item.
If you sell an item with a street price of 1000 gold, you normally get 500. Ten percent more of what you normally get is indeed 550.
It is a trait, not a road to immediate wealth.