Helaman
|
I've spent 2 days umming and ahhhing and reading optimisation guides but can't seem to generate a FLAVOURSOME sorcerer.
The game will start level 1 and top out at level 6.
I just have the Core Rules and APG to work with so Varisian tattoos etc isn't gonna work. It will be a combat moderate game that needs some RP and NPC interaction and will likely feature undead... Traits are slightly more flexible - race guides and faith guides only in addition to the APG.
Anyone able to give me a hand? Blaster is fine but happy to see other options.
| Davachido |
Well I guess it depends on what you want to do with it. I mean one of my favourite is the Stormborn sorcerer but then again I'm a sucker for lightning based abilities.
Saying that since it is E6 you don't need to spend that many feats on effectiveness, you can use the free 'shock' that stormborn gives you to be good at ranged damage. Take a decent Dex based race and have maybe a 1 or 2 str mod. Your 'blasting' can be done with ranged attacks and you can pick up arcane strike later. You'll only be 1 attack away from the 3/4 classes.
The rest of your spells can be battlefield control spells and/or useful spells for NPC interactions. (You can use things like gust of wind to defend your allies and not be hindered it yourself as you reduce the step by one.)
I can't say it's the most optimised but a sort of lightning version of the arcane archer is flavourful.
Human example: Arcane strike, PBS.
STR 12, DEX 16 (+2 race), CON 12, INT 10, WIS 7, CHA 16.
Ranged attack, with mighty mwk shortbow: +5, 1d6+1d6+3. Within 30ft and using arcane strike. Of course the build doesn't really start to work until you get more rounds of shock instead of just one (Since it's standard action to cast which sucks.)
The other option of course is using the shock to buff a two weapon fighter or any other martial.
Edit: If you find a race or trait to get you trained in Longbows you can then get gravity bows, so level one damage can be something like 3d6+2 which ain't too bad.
| Oterisk |
Reading optimization guides for flavor is a bad idea. They just tell you what they believe is potent. Flavor is what appeals to you. Do you like chocolate or vanilla? Or Strawberry? Or Fudge Ripple?
You need to pick a bloodline that appeals to you. Then build spells from there. There are some really good spells for first and second level, and haste can really be a game changer. Sleep and Color spray should be great for most of the campaign.
Some of the best blasting options are in ultimate magic, so sticking with some battlefield control might be the best way to go. Magical lineage and some metamagics can be very useful, and fits in with the flavor of a sorcerer.
The bloodlines that seem flavorful to me are Arcane, Boreal, Draconic, Fey, Infernal, Undead and Verdant. All of them have some good things about them, you just have to decide, and people here won't necessarily be helpful in that regard.
| Hayato Ken |
I can recommend Serpentine Bloodline for controlling foes. Just take spell focus necromancy and threnodic spell at level 6, so you can control undead too. That´s pretty much fun.
The other thing is marid or elemental bloodline, with the Irrisen icemage feat and rime spell. I think that´s really funny too. You can switch between fire and other spells, change everything to cold and slow them.
You can take a jinxing halfling or a gnome for both. That brings many other funny boons.
| StreamOfTheSky |
I suggest Fey bloodline, it gives nice spells not even normally available and the +2 compulsion DC will help for social situations as well as combat. Laughing touch is one of the better level 1 powers.
Be a Human, extra spells known is great. The first 3 levels will be limited to cantrips, but levels 4-5 you can get extra 1st level spells known and at level 6 an extra 2nd level spell.
| StreamOfTheSky |
Hmm, Verdant is also pretty good, I still like Fey better but Verdant is similar. Presumably not all enemies will be undead, and the control spells shouldn't be taking up more than a few of his spells known anyway, sorcs should always diversify. The Command Undead spell alone can largely take care of any non-mook undead you encounter anyway.
| bfobar |
You could go with the undead bloodline and use enchantments on undead that way too.
You could take celestial bloodline and use the level 1 power for zaps and heals.
really, if the campaign is undead heavy, just take the 0th level disrupt undead and then build whatever. All you get is an arcana, two bloodline powers, and 2 bloodlines spells by level 6.
Helaman
|
I ended up going with a gnomish pyromancer of Elemental Fire. Gives him 3 cantrips and produce flame as SLAs and added the gnome trait that adds an additional use of one of the gnome magic spell-like abilities each day. Given I have elemental rays I took grease and colour spray to give me a good range of options if produce flame attacks or ray attacks aren't appropriate.
Thanks all - some of these are good
| Atarlost |
I would strongly advise against playing a sorcerer in E6 play. You will have only one third level spell known. Since third level is when spells start getting good E6 is particularly rough on sorcerers. Oracles at least get their mystery spell and the partial casters have something to compensate for not having third level spells, but sorcerers just suffer.
Helaman
|
There are some Epic level feats that allow Sorcerers to pick up additional spells... true, the wizard gets to pump their choices elsewhere but its not all bad.
That said I have re-thought about the sorcerer and consider it to be very much inferior to the wizard, in just about every respect. They get less spells, their slots are APPROXIMATE in number, get less bonus feats and at higher levels and its only the Bloodline powers that somewhat sling the balance somewhat back in their favour.
If I was going to re-write the rules for Sorcerers I'd give them the same spell progress as wizards - they get less spells at any rate. ALTERNATIVELY, a bloodline feat at level 3 would go a long way.
By RAW they are playable, and fun even, but like the Rogue is quite niche but overall weaker than other options, so to is the sorcerer.
| Kydeem de'Morcaine |
... I have re-thought about the sorcerer and consider it to be very much inferior to the wizard, in just about every respect. They get less spells, their slots are APPROXIMATE in number, get less bonus feats and at higher levels and its only the Bloodline powers that somewhat sling the balance somewhat back in their favour... overall weaker than other options...
As has been said before. That weakness or strength is extremely dependent upon the individual play style, rest of the group, campaign, and GM.
1 - Some players absolutely hate having to try to pick different spells all the time and/or tracking what they do have in their spell book.
2 - When they do find a spell that works in the situation, they want to go ahead and use several of them in a row.
3 - Some want to be the party face which is sometimes difficult with a wizard.
4 - Some groups will not cooperate with the needs of a wizard to constantly expand their spell book
5 - Some groups don't want to pause before every day to plan out what spells to take, or hide for a few minutes while filling an empty slot.
6 - Some campaigns make wizards very difficult. Few/no opportunities to find or buys scrolls or otherwise learn new spells.
7 - Some campaigns have incredible time pressure or constant threats can make it very difficult to pause to fill an empty slot or otherwise prepare spells.
8 - Some GM's give very little (or at least misleading) info on what will be encounter/needed in the future. Spying, scrying, information gathering, etc... just gives very little specific useful information. {I admit, I have tendencies this way and have to constantly reign myself in and remember that not everything has to be a surprise/ambush.} This makes it so you really can't customize an ideal list of spells prepared.
9 - Some GM's rule that nearly no place is 'safe enough' to study and prep spells or fill an empty spell slot.
Any 1 or 2 of the above can make it so the wizard almost always has the exact same list of 'general' spells prepared. In which case, you might as well be running a sorcerer.
In the games I've played on or people I have talked to have played in, I find that it runs about 50/50 for the games where a prepared caster is better or worse than a spontaneous caster. Admitedly, this is a very small sample size but it is enough for me to dis-believe the 'wizard is always god' crowd.