| nedpatrick |
I am a GM and I have a pc in my campaign who took bleeding. He is having fun with it but I want to make sure that it isn't overused and doesn't overpower the campaign. What are the exact rules on a monster "not being able to defend itself"?
Are there any other limits I can use on it? I was thinking that it wouldn't work on demons.
Thanks for the advice
| nedpatrick |
Bleeding Attack has to be done as a sneak attack. The rules state "Sneak Attack: If a rogue can catch an opponent when he is unable to defend himself effectively from her attack, she can strike a vital spot for extra damage."
So what situations count for not being able to defend oneself effectively?
| Zaister |
You need to continue reading the rule entry for sneak attack beyond the first sentence which is basically just descriptive. You can use a sneak attack anytime an opponent is denied his detexity bonus against you, or when you and an ally are flanking the opponent. These are the situations that are described as the opponent "being unable to defend himself effectively".
| aboniks |
Heh. Just hope your player doesn't realize there's a combat feat called Bleeding Attack that doesn't require a sneak attack at all...although you need Imp. Unarmed Strike.
:)
| DM Under The Bridge |
You can call all their abilities a sea of piss if you want to be vulgar, but I don't agree and I find a lot that I like. So yes, taking the bleeding attack, some combat feats and a very diverse skill list buffed up by a few select skill focuses.
This rogue is ready for the mega dungeon my dm is planning.