Which alignment or alignments based on the Alignment System are you and which am i?


Gamer Life General Discussion

51 to 88 of 88 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Grand Lodge

bbgenderless100 wrote:
TriOmegaZero wrote:
Neutral.
Alright now about the OP?

Yes.


bbgenderless100 wrote:
Reshar wrote:
Lawful Neutral

Okay.

And about the first poster?

Given the description above, I will go for Chaotic Neutral.

On a side note, I choose "Lawful Neutral" because is the alignment that suits me most of the time. That said, sometimes the alignment chart could go to LE or even NG!


2 people marked this as a favorite.
bbgenderless100 wrote:
Alright now about the OP?

Chaotic Emo.


TriOmegaZero wrote:
bbgenderless100 wrote:
TriOmegaZero wrote:
Neutral.
Alright now about the OP?
Yes.

Which alignment works for it?


LazarX wrote:
bbgenderless100 wrote:
LazarX wrote:
bbgenderless100 wrote:
Okay, well the alignment system makes alot more sense then the Bible and anything similar to it.

Even as an atheist, I have a strong problem with that statement. It implies that you have a very narrow reductionist, superficial view of the world and the people around you. And if you've actually READ a Bible, you don't seem to have bothered to understand it much, or the contexts in which various parts of it were written over the centuries.

What you fail to understand is that alignment was built as a wargaming mechanic to determine what kind of units you could put together for a wargaming board army. It's roleplaying features are of secondary function and not really meant to be looked over with an electron microscope. Take any popular character of any real depth and you'll get equally convincing arguments for multiple alignments which may be more than one step from each other... because people ARE that complex.

Alignment is a crappy way of describing any character that's got more depth than an Ayn Rand cipher.

Alright. Well i tried reading the bible once and i just couldn't bring myself to read anymore and as far as my views go. Um i do not have to conform and become a copycat if i do not want too. Just because you decide to not believe in a god and read through the bible does not mean i have to conform and copy everything you do sir. And i know this alignment system was designed for something originally but i decided to believe in it, so you are allowed to believe we evolved from an ape? or that an explosion happened and we just came to be but how dare i choose to not conform and believe in something else? uh whats with the double standards? why am i denied my right to choose Lazar?
If you prefer to make your judgements from ignorance that is your right and no one will prevent you from doing so. Your arguments and pronouncements however will be weighed on the foundation (or lack of) you support...

Also doesn't the bible contradict itself like millions of times?

Also aren't you an atheist, i don't understand how one can not believe in god yet believe in the book that's all about him, isn't that contradictory?

The alignment system doesn't appear to have that problem from what i gathered, but eh.


Believing something and understanding it are two entirely, completely, utterly different things.

He's saying you need to understand it instead of falling back on the /r/atheism method of "Lol religion is stupid amirite guys XDDDDDD", whether or not you believe it.

I'm an atheist leaning Agnostic but I've done my part and read the Bible to make sure that yes, I do not truly believe in it. But I understand the points it's trying to make and the values it's trying to encourage.


I am obligated to let you all know that I'm detecting evil on this entire thread. Prepare to be smote if my paladin sense tingles.

And as for your question, Lawful Good. There are some who find it amusing to replace "good" with another descriptive term, usually not one that a Lawful Good person would use. It isn't funny.

*Settles in and stares at the thread intently, prepared to get up and smite if anything pings*

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

You couldn't detect your way out of a paper bag.


Put me down for Lawful Stupid Paladin.

AS per the OP, and people in general, you aren't evil just because you do a few things to hurt someone here and there. We would all be considered Evil in that case. In DnD, as in life, getting really angry with someone and hitting them, stealing lunch, etc. once in a blue moon isn't enough to make people consider you a terrible person.


Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber

I know I'm personally Lawful Neutral, and as for OP, i'm going to throw my voice in for Chaotic Neutral as well.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
The Blasphemer TOZ wrote:
You couldn't detect your way out of a paper bag.

I could if it were an evil bag! Or if there were someone evil at the end of it! And let me tell you, they would feel my holy wrath!

You're cruising for a... uh... you're writing for a smiting, citizen.

Liberty's Edge

CE. Definitely CE. But don't tell Lawful Stupid over there. *Draws +5 Poisoned Short Sword* He's mine.


Hm. I would roll a Perception check to see if I can perceive that comment, but the element of randomness in a die roll is too chaotic for a paladin's tastes.

Why do you think smite evil grants static bonuses instead of extra dice like so many other abilities?

Grand Lodge

Arbitrary design choices.


Big Lemon wrote:

Put me down for Lawful Stupid Paladin.

AS per the OP, and people in general, you aren't evil just because you do a few things to hurt someone here and there. We would all be considered Evil in that case. In DnD, as in life, getting really angry with someone and hitting them, stealing lunch, etc. once in a blue moon isn't enough to make people consider you a terrible person.

Okay? so would you agree that people would be Neutral then as opposed to evil? because i don't believe people are either exclusively and that goes doubly for me.


lucky7 wrote:
CE. Definitely CE. But don't tell Lawful Stupid over there. *Draws +5 Poisoned Short Sword* He's mine.

That's you or me?

I'm a member of your posse? actually scratch that, that would require effort lots of it so yea have fun being treated the same way as a LG and NG. LOL.


The Lawful Stupid Paladin wrote:

I am obligated to let you all know that I'm detecting evil on this entire thread. Prepare to be smote if my paladin sense tingles.

And as for your question, Lawful Good. There are some who find it amusing to replace "good" with another descriptive term, usually not one that a Lawful Good person would use. It isn't funny.

*Settles in and stares at the thread intently, prepared to get up and smite if anything pings*

Are you talking about me Paladin?

*Runs away just to grab a pepsi and popcorn just to fly away on a flying thing a majig*

Liberty's Edge

*attacks the paladin*

Attack with short sword 1d20 + 35 ⇒ (18) + 35 = 53

If hits 1d6 + 10 ⇒ (1) + 10 = 11

Make Fort Save

RPG Superstar 2015 Top 8

I think this is the first I've ever seen a relationship rant/advice thread disguised as an alignment thread. Very cleverly done!

I don't think the abstract game mechanics of alignment necessarily apply well to real life, but if we're going to try to pigeonhole ourselves, I'd say OP was CN.

As my profile states, I think I am NG, except when I am Chaotic or Lawful. (I have strong streaks of "but we have to follow the rules cause they're the RULES" but also of "not gonna do what you're gonna tell me to, screw authority!")


I think I'm Neutral Stupid. Or possibly Neutral (Stupid Tendencies).

Mind you, I took that online test and it came up with a great big picture of Stalin and told me I was Lawful Evil, so now I'm heading off to CRUSH THE WEAK IN THE NAME OF ASMODEUS. Just as soon as I've finished this flower arrangement.


Limeylongears wrote:

I think I'm Neutral Stupid. Or possibly Neutral (Stupid Tendencies).

Mind you, I took that online test and it came up with a great big picture of Stalin and told me I was Lawful Evil, so now I'm heading off to CRUSH THE WEAK IN THE NAME OF ASMODEUS. Just as soon as I've finished this flower arrangement.

Okay, now about the original post?


CN.


Judging by the fact that you chose this particular forum, I'm going to guess you either lurk or use these boards. If it is the second, I'm guessing this is not your main account. I'm also going to guess that what you want here is attention, whether positive or negative.

I know this because I've spent a fair portion of my life acting the exact same way. It'll get you your attention in the short term, but in the long term you are going to have the reputation of an annoying troublemaker, and people won't want you around. If you don't particularly care about this forum, fine. You'll eventually be banned, and if you come back you'll be banned again.

If you do care about your status on this forum, tread carefully. Try to seek attention by posting about your games or creations instead of fighting.

This applies to real life, too. As a general rule, people will give you the kind of attention that mirrors your actions, and if it's usually negative they won't want to be around you.

Truct me on this. I've screwed up my life pretty well by acting like this, and it's not easy to fix it.


Kelsey MacAilbert wrote:

Judging by the fact that you chose this particular forum, I'm going to guess you either lurk or use these boards. If it is the second, I'm guessing this is not your main account. I'm also going to guess that what you want here is attention, whether positive or negative.

I know this because I've spent a fair portion of my life acting the exact same way. It'll get you your attention in the short term, but in the long term you are going to have the reputation of an annoying troublemaker, and people won't want you around. If you don't particularly care about this forum, fine. You'll eventually be banned, and if you come back you'll be banned again.

If you do care about your status on this forum, tread carefully. Try to seek attention by posting about your games or creations instead of fighting.

This applies to real life, too. As a general rule, people will give you the kind of attention that mirrors your actions, and if it's usually negative they won't want to be around you.

Truct me on this. I've screwed up my life pretty well by acting like this, and it's not easy to fix it.

I wasn't sure what to say to this at first. But now that I've had time to think about this, i have to say: I'm sure you were being helpful and i thank you for your concern. But what about other people that do the same thing like cam girls? Why are they allowed to do the attention thing but not me? And yes i just compared this to someone who seeks attention on the internet the only difference is they do it for money and its okay for them but i"m a piece of garbage? sorry i don't get it. As far as what my reputation will end up being, I'm confused about this are you going to get me banned or something because that's what i gathered from it if not then my bad. To me i see it as defending myself. Its up to people on how they react to me, i can't really do anything to make them think anything but what they will think about me.

If they don't like me because i made an alignment thread then okay they can think that way.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Because cam girls can provide a certain amount of enjoyment through titillation.

This thread does not.

And you'll note that the term "piece of garbage"only appears in your own post.

RPG Superstar 2015 Top 8

I didn't know what a cam girl was so I googled it.

I wish people would just explain stuff sometimes so I wouldn't walk into a trap like that. (Girl who does live sex chats)


bbgenderless100 wrote:
Kelsey MacAilbert wrote:

Judging by the fact that you chose this particular forum, I'm going to guess you either lurk or use these boards. If it is the second, I'm guessing this is not your main account. I'm also going to guess that what you want here is attention, whether positive or negative.

I know this because I've spent a fair portion of my life acting the exact same way. It'll get you your attention in the short term, but in the long term you are going to have the reputation of an annoying troublemaker, and people won't want you around. If you don't particularly care about this forum, fine. You'll eventually be banned, and if you come back you'll be banned again.

If you do care about your status on this forum, tread carefully. Try to seek attention by posting about your games or creations instead of fighting.

This applies to real life, too. As a general rule, people will give you the kind of attention that mirrors your actions, and if it's usually negative they won't want to be around you.

Truct me on this. I've screwed up my life pretty well by acting like this, and it's not easy to fix it.

I wasn't sure what to say to this at first. But now that I've had time to think about this, i have to say: I'm sure you were being helpful and i thank you for your concern. But what about other people that do the same thing like cam girls? Why are they allowed to do the attention thing but not me? And yes i just compared this to someone who seeks attention on the internet the only difference is they do it for money and its okay for them but i"m a piece of garbage? sorry i don't get it. As far as what my reputation will end up being, I'm confused about this are you going to get me banned or something because that's what i gathered from it if not then my bad. To me i see it as defending myself. Its up to people on how they react to me, i can't really do anything to make them think anything but what they will think about me.

If they don't like me because i made an alignment thread then okay...

It's not about looking for attention, it's the kind of attention you are looking for. A lot of the attention cam girls get is either bad or sexual, because that's the kind of attention that behavior attracts. Everything social you do is a form of attention seeking. Look for the right kinds.

I'll post more tomorrow when I have time.


DeathQuaker wrote:

I think this is the first I've ever seen a relationship rant/advice thread disguised as an alignment thread. Very cleverly done!

I don't think the abstract game mechanics of alignment necessarily apply well to real life, but if we're going to try to pigeonhole ourselves, I'd say OP was CN.

As my profile states, I think I am NG, except when I am Chaotic or Lawful. (I have strong streaks of "but we have to follow the rules cause they're the RULES" but also of "not gonna do what you're gonna tell me to, screw authority!")

Don't we pigeonhole ourselves all the time though? What about the stereotypes thing? isn't that not pigeonholing as well? How about the whole league thing in dating? where people are pigeonholed into leagues and only those in the league they are pigeonholed into can date. What about the label of male and female isn't that pigeonholing as well? putting a label on someone that may or may not act like their biological gender. Most importantly how about the whole sexuality thing? saying that people are straight, gay, bisexual or asexual isn't that not also pigeonholing as well?


DeathQuaker wrote:

I didn't know what a cam girl was so I googled it.

I wish people would just explain stuff sometimes so I wouldn't walk into a trap like that. (Girl who does live sex chats)

I thought about just replying to the previous post with "Because boobs." but I don't often get to use the word titillation.

Sorry.


@Rynjin its not my fault that you were too lazy to read the title of the thread and just put in what alignment you were without bothering to read.

@Kirth Gersen You do know that the title of the thread says which alignment or alignments based on the alignment system are you and which am i? don't you? It wasn't put like that for nothing. Furthermore it ain't my fault that y all forgot about the other part of the title thread and just put in your own alignment.
And as for the alignment you put as okay?


bbgenderless100 wrote:
@Rynjin its not my fault that you were too lazy to read the title of the thread and just put in what alignment you were without bothering to read.

Considering, as I said in the first post "I dun give a f%##", you may have misunderstood me, but I personally never cared about the actual topic of the thread. I just wanted to see how this all unfolded, and whether it was an odd sort of forum game or a cry for attention/roundabout way of asking for relationship advice in an inappropriate setting.

As far as I can tell it's the latter.


bbgenderless100 wrote:
And as for the alignment you put as okay?

I thought my alignment guess for you was pretty accurate, and this post confirms it.


I believe in Sir Digby Chicken Caesar.


@Rynjin The first guess about what this was supposed to be is more accurate then the whole "a cry for attention/roundabout way of asking for relationship advice in an inappropriate setting." theory.

You could at least venture a guess like Kirth there.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

But you already admitted in another post that you WERE just seeking attention.

At least try to be consistent.

Project Manager

3 people marked this as a favorite.

OK, I'm not sure what this thread was originally supposed to be, but given that it's degenerated into impugning motives and arguing about cam girls, I'm locking it.

51 to 88 of 88 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Gamer Life / General Discussion / Which alignment or alignments based on the Alignment System are you and which am i? All Messageboards
Recent threads in General Discussion