Any word on that alleged tree die off?
|
Are we somehow the center of the universe again?I believe that was a rhetorical question to demonstrate the idiocy of the previously described concept, that would result in the earth being the center of the universe, but would also be the logical follow up to one of a couple fallacies I was pointing out.
CBD- this is actually true. DLH does not understand uniform expansion and stated that the rest of the universe cannot be moving away from Earth because that would mean we would have to be at the center.
So, there was a misunderstanding, but it wasn't the exact one that you thought. ;)
|
Oh please, that is disregarding the other statement I made.
I stated that the universe is expanding but isn't accelerating in it's expansion.
Please try not to contradict something so explicity stated. I may not be the best at explaining the reasons why I believe or queston something, but I don't see how you can mistake that sentance.
Oh please, that is disregarding the other statement I made.
I stated that the universe is expanding but isn't accelerating in it's expansion.
Please try not to contradict something so explicity stated. I may not be the best at explaining the reasons why I believe or queston something, but I don't see how you can mistake that sentance.
Please try not to contradict something so explicity stated. I may not be the best at explaining the reasons why I believe or queston something, but I don't see how you can mistake that sentance.
I don't see how you can mistake that sentance.
sentance.
sentance.
Sentence.
Money was created so that people could trade for things without having to make change for a cow. It's worked amazingly well for it's purpose since then.No. Money was created to make it easy for people to SAVE money.
For simple economies, barter works just fine.So, I pose to you a pure economics question why do sophisticated
economies need it to be 'easy' for people to SAVE money???I'll even throw in >a book< to help you.
... stuff stuff stuff ... Saving money is worthless.
Economics needs it to be easy for people to save money because that is the illusion that gives the rich the upper hand. Think for a moment, the rich are only rich because there is inequality in the system. If you took all the money in the world and evenly divided it up among all the people, no one would be very rich, even by today's standards.
... stuff ...
Not even close to the correct answer.
The Dean wanted grades turned in -- I gave you a 0.00%
But, I'll replace your grade with your score from > this < quiz.
.
|
|
I believe that was a rhetorical question to demonstrate the idiocy of the previously described concept, that would result in the earth being the center of the universe, but would also be the logical follow up to one of a couple fallacies I was pointing out.
And therein lies the problem... because you argued that the Earth would have to be at the center of the universe in order for objects near it to appear to be moving away more slowly than objects far from it. I used the balloon analogy to show why this was false (e.g. as the balloon expands dots on its surface [i.e. NOT THE CENTER] near each other move apart more slowly than dots far apart from each other). Your insistence that the Earth would have to be in the center of the universe to observe this effect is clearly and obviously wrong... yet you continue to state it in your response above without even TRYING to address (or apparently comprehend) the obvious proof that it is false.
...oh crap.
I believe that was a rhetorical question to demonstrate the idiocy of the previously described concept, that would result in the earth being the center of the universe, but would also be the logical follow up to one of a couple fallacies I was pointing out.And therein lies the problem... because you argued that the Earth would have to be at the center of the universe in order for objects near it to appear to be moving away more slowly than objects far from it. I used the balloon analogy to show why this was false (e.g. as the balloon expands dots on its surface [i.e. NOT THE CENTER] near each other move apart more slowly than dots far apart from each other). Your insistence that the Earth would have to be in the center of the universe to observe this effect is clearly and obviously wrong... yet you continue to state it in your response above without even TRYING to address (or apparently comprehend) the obvious proof that it is false.
CBD, the problem with your proof is that it didn't come from DLH's ovule. (That's a part of a flower)
