
The Bard |

I was looking at the Soundstriker Bard and noticed neither of the abilities say Lingering Performance can't be used on them.
I believe this mean that, at 6th level and over 3 rounds, a Soundstriker can make 18 attacks for the cost of 3 stadard actions and 1 round of performance. Am I missing something, or is it as cool as it seems?

![]() |

Here you go:
Conductive
Price +1 bonus
Aura moderate necromancy; CL 8th; Weight —
DESCRIPTION
A conductive weapon is able to channel the energy of a spell-like or supernatural ability that relies on a melee or ranged touch attack to hit its target (such as from a cleric's domain granted power, sorcerer's bloodline power, oracle's mystery revelation, or wizard's arcane school power). When the wielder makes a successful attack of the appropriate type, he may choose to expend two uses of his magical ability to channel it through the weapon to the struck opponent, which suffers the effects of both the weapon attack and the special ability. (If the wielder has unlimited uses of a special ability, she may channel through the weapon every round.) For example, a paladin who strikes an undead opponent with her conductive greatsword can expend two uses of her lay on hands ability (a supernatural melee touch attack) to deal both greatsword damage and damage from one use of lay on hands. This weapon special ability can only be used once per round, and only works with magical abilities of the same type as the weapon (melee or ranged).
CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS
Craft Magic Arms and Armor, spectral hand; Cost +1 bonus

TGMaxMaxer |
but would you rule it as spend 2 arrows to channel 1? or 2 performances to channel the whole amount(1/level up to 10)

Sangalor |

If you are looking at creating a blaster bard, since it has not been brought up I would point you to the magician. You get to pick several spells from other arcane spell lists and could choose blasting spells. Also, later, you can use your own CHA for the DCs on wands and use your own caster level for it.
You could thus buy (or even create with according spellcraft checks) wands of fireball, dragon breath, scorching ray etc.... :-)

Sangalor |

It will work with a Net, or Firearm.
A Firearm with the Scatter property will allow you to effect several opponents.
Net: you are right. I looked up the wrong "net" ;-P
Would there be another bonus of using that conductive property in the beside adding to damage on a successful hit?
The ranged touch attacks cause much more damage per round when you level up...

![]() |

Several things -
1) Since the conductive weapon is only once per round, wouldn't that limit it to a single 1d8 attack on a single target using the conductive weapon in question, as each "word" is a separate single attack with a separate ranged touch attack roll?
2) Also - "start a performance as a standard action". Not continue or maintain, but simply "start". This language alone suggests to me this is not an intended application of Weird Words.
3) Also, very important - "This performance can't be performed faster than a standard action."

The Bard |

Several things -
1) Since the conductive weapon is only once per round, wouldn't that limit it to a single 1d8 attack on a single target using the conductive weapon in question, as each "word" is a separate single attack with a separate ranged touch attack roll?
Conductive may be for just one attack, but you still get the full use of Weird Words, since all the attacks go through the weapon.

Gobo Horde |

Add a splash of barbarian and with the raging finish feat grants all damage diceas max damage and since weird words are damage dice...
I'm not entirely sure it works and I'm tired. Just throwing it out so others can check the validity. Also look up lances and dealing triple damage if that would stack with the conductive property.

Dekalinder |

enaudible wrote:Conductive may be for just one attack, but you still get the full use of Weird Words, since all the attacks go through the weapon.Several things -
1) Since the conductive weapon is only once per round, wouldn't that limit it to a single 1d8 attack on a single target using the conductive weapon in question, as each "word" is a separate single attack with a separate ranged touch attack roll?
Conductive channels a single strike during the attacks, not the full usage of the ability.

TGMaxMaxer |
No... on a successful hit, conductive channels a single -use- of a SU or SLA. Weird Words gives 1/level for a single use of the ability, and has already been ruled that you can target the same enemy with all words.
Unless perhaps, you would like to only give 1d6 of the total channel damage of a smite? regardless of the 10th level cleric using it?
You would however, get a fort/half save for each d8 of weird words.
But it channels the full number on a single strike, limited to one use per round.
And, per the conductive property description, you couldn't target anyone else anyways, since it has to target the enemy hit by the weapon with the SU or SLA used.

Ender730 |
No... on a successful hit, conductive channels a single -use- of a SU or SLA. Weird Words gives 1/level for a single use of the ability, and has already been ruled that you can target the same enemy with all words.
Unless perhaps, you would like to only give 1d6 of the total channel damage of a smite? regardless of the 10th level cleric using it?
You would however, get a fort/half save for each d8 of weird words.
But it channels the full number on a single strike, limited to one use per round.
And, per the conductive property description, you couldn't target anyone else anyways, since it has to target the enemy hit by the weapon with the SU or SLA used.
I've been looking everywhere for an official ruling (or at least a forum response by SKR or something) regarding Weird Words. Can you link the ruling that you mention? I'm curious if Weird Words can all be directed to the same target, and I also want to see the ruling on Conductive being able to deliver all the Weird Words on the same target.