| JJNinja |
Hi! i'm building a kobold png and i liked very much the idea of the tail attachments, i'm building a rogue so i planned to use two shortswords and a razored tail attachment, whwn i came up to the multi weapon fighting feat i saw it states you need to have 3 or more hands, i would like to know if it's intended that a creature with an additional limb (the tail in this case) that can be used to do a manufactured weapon attack can't get access to the multiweapon fighting chain or it's simply bad wording...
Also i would like to be sure tail attachments attacks count as weapon attacks.
Thanks
| Grick |
Hi! i'm building a kobold png and i liked very much the idea of the tail attachments, i'm building a rogue so i planned to use two shortswords and a razored tail attachment, whwn i came up to the multi weapon fighting feat i saw it states you need to have 3 or more hands, i would like to know if it's intended that a creature with an additional limb (the tail in this case) that can be used to do a manufactured weapon attack can't get access to the multiweapon fighting chain or it's simply bad wording...
Also i would like to be sure tail attachments attacks count as weapon attacks.
I assume that since the tail attachment will "augment" your natural attack (the tail slap granted by Tail Terror) it remains a natural attack. It's a light weapon for things like special materials, hardness, HP, etc.
Natural Attacks don't take Two-Weapon Fighting penalties, so multiweapon fighting doesn't help any.
The kobold section of the ARG isn't written very well, so the intent could really go either way.
| JJNinja |
It's not clear as it specifically state that they are light weapons, an other similar situations do not help (as a catfolk clawblade is a weapon, but a ratfolk tailblade is a natural attack), i think RAI it should work (as a tail with a blade on it it's not much different from a weapon held in hand), but since i'm building this for a contest i need to use RAW.
| Icyshadow |
Also I noticed that kobold tail attachments form a fighter weapon specialization group, if the attack is still a natural attack, why making a new group, it would be in the natural attacks group
Because the devs are silly* and made more than just that little mistake in regards to the ARG.
* = Then again, they're only human. Mistakes happen, even in regards to the best of us. Just houserule it or something.
| JJNinja |
So they are weapon attacks.
Now in your opinion which is the most likeable option:
1) Multi weapon fighting requirements are badly worded and should be rewritten this way:
Prerequisites: 3 or more limbs able to wield a weapon
2)My PNG Can't access MWF, in this case my attack routine how should look like? (assuming i'm a lvl 10 rogue using two short swords and a tail attachment)
+5/+5/+5/+2/+2
or
+5/+5/+2/+2/+2
or
+5/+5/-1/+2/+2
?
| Skylancer4 |
In the case I posted which is my attack routine?
I don't believe any of the ones you posted would be correct.
The tail attack becomes a light martial weapon, which means it is no longer a 'natural' weapon. You basically have the option of using it on any of the of the attacks you would normally make during a TWF routine. You don't get an extra attack from the tail anymore (like you would if it were a natural weapon). It would take the place of one of the short swords in the routine.