| Tharialas |
I was playing some Pathfinder a few weeks ago and am curious about the logic of reach with a natural weapon(I.E. Claws/Talons/Tails). Why would I not be able to prepare and action to attack a limb of a creature with reach that is hitting me with a natural weapon? Or for that matter trying to sunder a weapon that is hitting me with reach?
BYC
|
Because the game breaks down completely if you allow that. The mechanics of reach and threatening squares are completely thrown out the door if the rules allowed it. Reach would have very little advantages.
There are a few 100+ post threads about this if you want to do a search.
Remember, this is a game. Logic often does not apply. Balance is important than logic IMO, otherwise the game breaks down and becomes unplayable.
| Anguish |
There's a feat that allows this, actually.
Also, my group(s) house-rule allow this without the feat. As a DM frankly I'd rather see PCs wasting actions readying to attack my bad guy's claw than taking one AoO to get in close. Once they're close, next round either I lose an action to back off or they're going to start getting full attacks. No thanks. Stay... out there. Where I can pound you to little bits.
| Grick |
Once they're close, next round either I lose an action to back off or they're going to start getting full attacks. No thanks. Stay... out there. Where I can pound you to little bits.
If the creature has natural reach, rather than using a reach weapon, they threaten all squares within their range. An ogre, for example, can hit someone 10 feet away, but he can also hit someone adjacent to him. So even if the PC takes an AoO to get adjacent, the ogre can still full attack him. And even better, if the PC wants to get away, the Withdraw action only prevents provoking for the first square, so you still get to him him if he runs.
-edit-
I misread your statement. You don't want the PC to get full attacks against your creature. Disregard!