| David Thomassen |
What order are Two-Weapon Fighting Attacks made in & what about the extra attack from Haste?
Primary Hand - Longsword
Off-Hand - Sickle (Trip Weapon)
BAB +6, so without the Improved TWF I only get 1 attack with the off-hand.
Obviously I would like to trip my opponent first, then attack with the Longsword (Twice), gaining a +4 to hit, due to a prone target.
But my gut is telling me that the first attack must come from the Primary Hand: Longsword, then Trip with Sickle, then attack with Logsword again (at BAB-5).
When does the Haste Attack come? When you want / Start / End?
Jiggy
RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32
|
What order are Two-Weapon Fighting Attacks made in & what about the extra attack from Haste?
Primary Hand - Longsword
Off-Hand - Sickle (Trip Weapon)BAB +6, so without the Improved TWF I only get 1 attack with the off-hand.
Obviously I would like to trip my opponent first, then attack with the Longsword (Twice), gaining a +4 to hit, due to a prone target.But my gut is telling me that the first attack must come from the Primary Hand: Longsword, then Trip with Sickle, then attack with Logsword again (at BAB-5).
When does the Haste Attack come? When you want / Start / End?
The two-weapon fighting rules in the Combat chapter of the CRB don't say anything about a certain order, just that you can get an extra attack. I see no reason you couldn't start with the sickle.
Same with haste - it says nothing about the order.
As for the iterative attacks, the combat chapter does specify that you start with your highest bonus and work your way down. But I can't find anything suggesting that other "extra" attacks (as from TWF or haste) have to come at a certain point.
Mergy
|
You can pick which hand goes first, and you resolve all of those attacks before beginning with your other hand.
If you get multiple attacks because your base attack bonus is high enough, you must make the attacks in order from highest bonus to lowest. If you are using two weapons, you can strike with either weapon first. If you are using a double weapon, you can strike with either part of the weapon first.
| Grick |
What order are Two-Weapon Fighting Attacks made in & what about the extra attack from Haste?
Full Attack: "If you are using two weapons, you can strike with either weapon first."
So you may sickle/trip before longsword beatdown.
Haste does not specify.
For iterative attacks, "If you get multiple attacks because your base attack bonus is high enough, you must make the attacks in order from highest bonus to lowest." I take this to mean not only do you start with the highest BAB attack, but you perform ALL of them, then other attacks. Many people here prefer to interlace their attacks (main, off, main, off) but I think it's easier to run and more compliant with the rule to make all the main-hand iterative attacks in order, uninterrupted.
Jiggy
RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32, RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32
|
You can pick which hand goes first, and you resolve all of those attacks before beginning with your other hand.
Core Rulebook wrote:If you get multiple attacks because your base attack bonus is high enough, you must make the attacks in order from highest bonus to lowest. If you are using two weapons, you can strike with either weapon first. If you are using a double weapon, you can strike with either part of the weapon first.
"Either weapon first" does not equal "all attacks with one hand then all attacks with the other". I'm not sure how you got that.
Mergy
|
Mergy wrote:"Either weapon first" does not equal "all attacks with one hand then all attacks with the other". I'm not sure how you got that.You can pick which hand goes first, and you resolve all of those attacks before beginning with your other hand.
Core Rulebook wrote:If you get multiple attacks because your base attack bonus is high enough, you must make the attacks in order from highest bonus to lowest. If you are using two weapons, you can strike with either weapon first. If you are using a double weapon, you can strike with either part of the weapon first.
Yeah, that was a bit of a ridiculous brainfart. Nevermind.
| Grick |
"Either weapon first" does not equal "all attacks with one hand then all attacks with the other". I'm not sure how you got that.
The reasoning is the attacks from high BAB (from here on: "iterative attacks") must be made in order, highest to lowest.
Off hand attacks are similar, the feats grant a second attack and a third attack respectively.
Many people consider that to be a restriction ONLY on those iterative attacks or off-hand attacks themselves, thus interlacing attacks from other weapons, haste, etc. is OK, as long as the iterative/offhand attacks themselves don't get out of order.
Others (myself included) think the RAI is that each hand goes off on its own, so all the iterative attacks must be made, not only in order, but without other attacks in between. Much like a monster stat block. (Balor: longsword +31/+26/+21/+16, whip +30/+25/+20)
This also simplifies things, as the iterative attacks are fairly straightforward: one bonus, then -5, then -5, etc. Same damage, same basic bonus due to weapon enchants, feats, etc. Then start with the next weapon(s).
The Balor example is much less confusing than longsword +31, whip +30, longsword +26, whip +25, longsword +21, whip +20, longsword +16.
| james maissen |
What order are Two-Weapon Fighting Attacks made in & what about the extra attack from Haste?
My belief is that they go in descending BAB order. When the BAB is equal either can be taken.
So in your example there would be a choice of order of the 1st three attacks: hasted, primary & secondary. Then there would be a choice of iteratives (if you have ITWF), then a potential choice of 2nd iteratives, etc.
I believe the intent is to avoid certain easier attacks and 'saving' up better attacks.
For example back when trip was a touch attack and then a STR check it would be optimal to take the weakest iterative attack to trip and THEN take the remainder when they are tripped.
Yet this was not allowed... and I believe it to be the spirit of things,
James