Shield Bash and two weapon fighting


Rules Questions


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Improved shield bash makes it so i keep my shield AC but can I use shield bash in addition to my regular attack without having two weapon fighting?

level 4 fighter


Morris Chan wrote:

Improved shield bash makes it so i keep my shield AC but can I use shield bash in addition to my regular attack without having two weapon fighting?

level 4 fighter

Nope. If you use two weapons then it is assumed that you are TWF'ing.


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook, Starfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Morris Chan wrote:

Improved shield bash makes it so i keep my shield AC but can I use shield bash in addition to my regular attack without having two weapon fighting?

Yes. You can. The penalties for fighting with two weapons with the feat two weapon fighting are quite substantial (-6 to hit with the main hand, -10 to offhand or -4/-8 if the offhand is light) though.

Scarab Sages

I have a player in my current campaign who is running a specialized shield-fighter: the character is a Fighter with the TWF feat, and he uses a spiked shield as his primary weapon, with a light weapon in his off-hand. I actually didn't realize that the shield was in his primary hand at first. It seems a little silly to me (Gee, I could hit the bad guy with this perfectly serviceable axe in my hand... but no! I will whack him with my mighty shield!) but he likes it and I suppose it's more interesting than classic sword-and-board.

Scarab Sages

Wolfsnap wrote:
I have a player in my current campaign who is running a specialized shield-fighter: the character is a Fighter with the TWF feat, and he uses a spiked shield as his primary weapon, with a light weapon in his off-hand. I actually didn't realize that the shield was in his primary hand at first. It seems a little silly to me (Gee, I could hit the bad guy with this perfectly serviceable axe in my hand... but no! I will whack him with my mighty shield!) but he likes it and I suppose it's more interesting than classic sword-and-board.

You can't use a shield as a main hand weapon.

From prd:
shield-bash-attacks

Liberty's Edge

Morris Chan wrote:

Improved shield bash makes it so i keep my shield AC but can I use shield bash in addition to my regular attack without having two weapon fighting?

level 4 fighter

Your 4th level fighter has a BAB of +4, so only has one attack. He can gain an additional attack by fighting with two weapons. Doing so will incur penalties on both attacks. When your fighter has a BAB of +6, he can make two attacks. Such attacks can be mixed between weapons held without incurring penalties for fighting with two weapons; those penalties apply when gaining attacks beyond those due to BAB.

Two Weapon Fighting:
The rule reads, "If you wield a second weapon in your off hand, you can get one extra attack per round with that weapon. You suffer a –6 penalty with your regular attack or attacks with your primary hand and a –10 penalty to the attack with your off hand when you fight this way." Grammatically, fight this way refers to getting the extra attack, not merely using two weapons. Mixing attacks without penalty was well established in 3.5 SRD/D&D. PF has some rules that seem to be written with the idea that any use of two weapons implies penalties. The APG fighter archetype Shield Master comes to mind. So, YMMV.

The shield description includes: "You can bash an opponent with a light shield, using it as an off-hand weapon." Some interpret this as saying that a shield can never be used as a primary or only weapon. Others are fine using a shield as primary or only weapon. Check with your GM for his interpretation.


Bhrymm wrote:
Wolfsnap wrote:
I have a player in my current campaign who is running a specialized shield-fighter: the character is a Fighter with the TWF feat, and he uses a spiked shield as his primary weapon, with a light weapon in his off-hand. I actually didn't realize that the shield was in his primary hand at first. It seems a little silly to me (Gee, I could hit the bad guy with this perfectly serviceable axe in my hand... but no! I will whack him with my mighty shield!) but he likes it and I suppose it's more interesting than classic sword-and-board.

You can't use a shield as a main hand weapon.

From prd:
shield-bash-attacks

By RAW you're correct but it's his game and he's obviously allowing it so why does it matter?


Matt Stich wrote:
Bhrymm wrote:
Wolfsnap wrote:
I have a player in my current campaign who is running a specialized shield-fighter: the character is a Fighter with the TWF feat, and he uses a spiked shield as his primary weapon, with a light weapon in his off-hand. I actually didn't realize that the shield was in his primary hand at first. It seems a little silly to me (Gee, I could hit the bad guy with this perfectly serviceable axe in my hand... but no! I will whack him with my mighty shield!) but he likes it and I suppose it's more interesting than classic sword-and-board.

You can't use a shield as a main hand weapon.

From prd:
shield-bash-attacks

By RAW you're correct but it's his game and he's obviously allowing it so why does it matter?

Sometimes people allow things because they just don't know the rules are against it. There is nothing wrong with pointing things and I did not read that post as Bhrymm telling anyone they were "doing it wrong". It was more like "did you know about this".

edit:removed a period in the middle of the sentence.


wraithstrike wrote:
Matt Stich wrote:
Bhrymm wrote:
Wolfsnap wrote:
I have a player in my current campaign who is running a specialized shield-fighter: the character is a Fighter with the TWF feat, and he uses a spiked shield as his primary weapon, with a light weapon in his off-hand. I actually didn't realize that the shield was in his primary hand at first. It seems a little silly to me (Gee, I could hit the bad guy with this perfectly serviceable axe in my hand... but no! I will whack him with my mighty shield!) but he likes it and I suppose it's more interesting than classic sword-and-board.

You can't use a shield as a main hand weapon.

From prd:
shield-bash-attacks

By RAW you're correct but it's his game and he's obviously allowing it so why does it matter?
Sometimes people allow things because they just don't know the rules are against it. There is nothing wrong with pointing things and. I did not read that post as Bhrymm telling anyone they were "doing it wrong". It was more like "did you know about this".

I kinda did read it like that. I guess I'm prone to reading that as "you're doing it wrong" cause a few of the people I play with tend to rules lawyer (when they themselves are wrong) and constantly tell me I'm playing it wrong. Sorry.

Scarab Sages

I remember trying to parse the rule out when I first realized he was doing it, and ultimately decided to just let it go. He's having fun with it, and it doesn't break the game.


Quote:

You can't use a shield as a main hand weapon.

From prd:
shield-bash-attacks

So what am I missing in your reference:

Quote:
Shield Bash Attacks: You can bash an opponent with a heavy shield. See “shield, heavy” on Table: Weapons for the damage dealt by a shield bash. Used this way, a heavy shield is a martial bludgeoning weapon. For the purpose of penalties on attack rolls, treat a heavy shield as a one-handed weapon. If you use your shield as a weapon, you lose its AC bonus until your next turn. An enhancement bonus on a shield does not improve the effectiveness of a shield bash made with it, but the shield can be made into a magic weapon in its own right.

Where does that say you cannot use the shield as primary?


There used to be language saying a shield's attack was an off-hand weapon because they assumed you would just use your weapon as the primary attack. It may or may not still be in the book somewhere, but it is not a rule that you have to use it in your off-hand, but the rules assume certain things when they are written.

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Two year old threads.

They can be tricky to respond to.


wraithstrike wrote:
There used to be language saying a shield's attack was an off-hand weapon because they assumed you would just use your weapon as the primary attack. It may or may not still be in the book somewhere, but it is not a rule that you have to use it in your off-hand, but the rules assume certain things when they are written.

Got it. Checked my 1st printing book and it's there. Checked the errata 1.4 and its gone:

Quote:

Page 152—In the Armor Descriptions, in the Shield, Heavy; Wooden or Steel entry, in the Shield Bash Attacks section, in the first sentence, delete “using it as an off-hand weapon.” Repeat this change to the Shield, Light; Wooden or Steel entry.[/QUOTE}

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Rules Questions / Shield Bash and two weapon fighting All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in Rules Questions