Watchmen


Movies

51 to 100 of 136 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>
Sovereign Court

Andrew Betts wrote:

I think Alan Moore would be pissed even if the movie was 100% accurate and the script was word for word.

He's a good writer, but far too stuck on himself.

Yeah, every interview/story I've read on him makes him sound like an egotistical a-hole.

Liberty's Edge

He is kinda mad at Hollywood, which I think is understandable.

Liberty's Edge

Maybe Rorschach's

Spoiler:
inability to compromise is a facet of Moore's psyche creeping in to his work...


I saw this film yesterday, and I have to say, I really liked it. In my opinion, the major change that was made still worked very well, and I can understand why it was made. I particularly liked how Dr Manhattan and Rorshach turned out - they were very much like how I had imagined them while reading the GN. :)

With regards to Dr. Manhattan's nudity, I would have been disappointed had they censored him. I think it's an important part of showing his detachment from humanity - he just doesn't see the point in clothing as we do. Additionally, there seems to be a general acceptance for a lot of violence in films, but as soon as there's any nudity (particularly male nudity), there's an outcry. It just seems odd to me.

However, saying that, I do agree on thinking that the US rating for the film seems a little odd, given its general content. Here in the UK, it's rated for over-18s only, which I think is the right choice.

Just my two cents, and another vote for the film being awesome. :)


Jackie Earle Haley is Rorschach. WOW! I remember liking that character when reading the book, but the story was about the Comedian and Nite Owl II for me, but now...

I'm with Heathy and DEMAND a Rorschach solo prequel.


Just curious

Spoiler:
Does Dr. Manhattan kill Rorschach as in the graphic novel?


Garydee wrote:

Just curious

** spoiler omitted **

Oh yeah baby...and in true Rorschach form does he leave his mark...

Liberty's Edge

Garydee wrote:

Just curious

** spoiler omitted **

Spoiler:
I almost cried. Almost.

I enjoyed the movie; didnt read any of the comics so I was stumped on who the bad guy was until it came out at the end of the movie; nicely done.

Liberty's Edge

Cool. It would've been cool to be stumped...


Is there something wrong with me? I saw the preview and said, "My god, that looks horrible!"

Then again, "she's just not that into you" sure didn't look very appealing, either -- mostly because I'm not a chick... I've never read comic books (couldn't afford them as a kid) and as an adult I don't usually enjoy movies made from them. In both cases, apparently I'm just not the target audience, I suspect.

Then again, if there's anyone here who hated "Spiderman," "300," and "Sin City" (like me), but who liked this one, then I'd maybe be willing to give it a chance.


drunken_nomad wrote:
Jackie Earle Haley is Rorschach.

Definitely. He really nails it.

On the down side, I didn't think much of Malin (Laurie Jupiter), which is a shame given so much of the movie depends on her performance, which generally just wasnt believable.(not even When she says "I love you mom", which is probably th emost down to earth part of the story, if you think aobut it)

Overall a decent movie, but not a great one... and some of the changes at the end just don;t make as much sense as they might, which is a shame.

For example Jons last conversation with Adrian is transfered over to being between Laurie and Dan, which loses a massive part of its impact (Jon after all, KNOWS the future, Laurie doesnt).

Haley *is* terrific in it, though, and its worth a *ahem* watch..but don't get you hopes up too high.

I'd say about 3.5 out of 5...

If you've not read the comic, but even halfway enjoyed the movie, I'd recommend you go get it. Its far deeper & more involving than the movie and the ending makes more sense.


The nudity didn't bother me in and of itself, just that I wasn't expecting it. Mainly I believe this is due to the fact I haven't read the comic, and don't know about the plot beyond the movie. I was expecting "another superhero movie"(tm).

I must say it wasn't that. There were a few kids in the audience, which suprised me some (especially when they weren't walked out by their parents) but that's not my issue either.


Having not been able to eye-tolerate the GN (I read the text boxes), the film was a pleasant surprise. My commentary here is strictly on the film.

For me, it was almost like being tossed back to age 14, bringing back some elements from nearly 25 years ago, then skipping forward over the next few years until the Berlin Wall fell.

Mulling it over the past few hours, I'd have to say that the film made me think much more than I would have thought for an R-rated movie, especially post-movie.


Mishi wrote:
Additionally, there seems to be a general acceptance for a lot of violence in films, but as soon as there's any nudity (particularly male nudity), there's an outcry. It just seems odd to me.

I won't outcry. But I am damn glad I peeked into this thread before seeing the film. Had I not been warned about the "lower" Manhattan syndrome before seeing the film, I could have been offput by it.

Now, I understand, and fully support "turning the tables" on nudity in films. But I will outcry a bit about the large amount of bare male ass in the film, with a corresponding small amount (none as far as I am concerned) of bare female ass. And we were even cheated on the bare breast scene. Not to mention, the "inflatable" top (it looked like a balloon) of Silk Specter's outfit looked absolutely silly. Her outfit from the waist down was stellar though.

Liberty's Edge

Den wouldn't've walked around like that.


If you refuse, you die; she dies; everybody dies!

Liberty's Edge

"I know what a locnar is you b&*$%! Give it to me! It's my locnar!"

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 4, RPG Superstar 2015 Top 32

Kirth Gersen wrote:

Is there something wrong with me? I saw the preview and said, "My god, that looks horrible!"

I didn't think much of the previews either. It looks a lot better in context and on a big screen, though.

Whether folks liked the film or not, I really think people should take a moment to realize how amazing it is that Zak Snyder managed to put it together like he did. I can't imagine that it was anything but an uphill fight to get the studio to approve most of what he did. Execs were very likely pushing to make it more kid friendly, but the result we got is very close to the comic itself.

There are a few drafts of previous Watchmen scripts floating around the Net that are absolutely pathetic. It's quite amazing that this is the movie we got rather than one of the previous studio-friendly versions that had been in the works.


drunken_nomad wrote:

Jackie Earle Haley is Rorschach.

I'm with Heathy and DEMAND a Rorschach solo prequel.

I have to concur, Rorschach just about stole the movie from the rest of the cast.

There are some classic moments in the film though that I enjoyed immensely.

Liberty's Edge

I saw his face....and I said, "yup. That's Rorschach."
I wonder if he's related to Arnold Rorschach from Welcome Back Carter.


One serious flaw with the new ending.

Spoiler:
The devices used the energy that created Dr. Manhattan. Now maybe Dr. Manhattan was unusual in that he was able to use his mind to put himself back together, it is doubtful that he would have been entirely unique. Given the fact that the devices went off in large cities, statistically there should have been at least a few (maybe only one or two even) new "Dr. Manhattan"s formed.

Liberty's Edge

flaw....or....

Spoiler:
sequel?!?!?

Liberty's Edge

no flaw but

Spoiler:
i doubt anyone has such knowledge of molecular and atomic science as to reform themselves... the fact that he did was beyond luck... it was sher will and understanding of what he was doing.

Grand Lodge

Spoiler:
One of the theories going around is that Jon is a ghost. He died after the person he loved most was unable to stand with him as he faced death. His practice in putting intricate things together in the proper order let him try to reassemble himself, but it wasn't until she was present that he was able to manifest. So now he's a ghost unable to move on. I think it makes sense, and explains why there hasn't been a repeat.

Paizo Employee Chief Creative Officer, Publisher

Disenchanter wrote:
And we were even cheated on the bare breast scene.

Did you see the same movie I did?

Dark Archive

Erik Mona wrote:
Disenchanter wrote:
And we were even cheated on the bare breast scene.

Did you see the same movie I did?

Some countries like mine censor things like that even if the rating they gave the movie is already R.


One the flaw

Spoiler:

He, knew it was happing,he knew just how it worked, his mind new he would be stripped apart molecule by molecule. And he was like an prodigy anyhow. Unliky anyone else can meet all them needs

Liberty's Edge

Erik Mona wrote:
Disenchanter wrote:
And we were even cheated on the bare breast scene.

Did you see the same movie I did?

Is The Crotchmen out at the XXX store yet?


Heathansson wrote:
Erik Mona wrote:
Disenchanter wrote:
And we were even cheated on the bare breast scene.

Did you see the same movie I did?

Is The Crotchmen out at the XXX store yet?

Take at least another week to get to shelf - pron industry is fast, but I don't know that they're THAT fast...

EDIT: Although you get the "cable-ready pron" just by editing down the actual movie itself. You'll even have hotel-room video quality if you edit-down the almost-universally-horrid bootleg videos that come out within a week or so of mainstream release...

Paizo Employee Chief Creative Officer, Publisher

That one might actually be worth watching.

Liberty's Edge

"Hurrm..."


I thought all the male nudity was handled in an incredibly tasteful fashion, just like in the comics. Manhattan isn't a model strutting his stuff and chuckling about how he's a dirty boy, and the film didn't treat him like one. He's just a dude so out of touch that he doesn't bother with clothes. The film neither insults us by hiding it nor by tarting it up as some kind of porn. It's one of the healthiest depictions of ordinary nudity I've ever seen in the movies.


Samnell wrote:
I thought all the male nudity was handled in an incredibly tasteful fashion, just like in the comics. Manhattan isn't a model strutting his stuff and chuckling about how he's a dirty boy, and the film didn't treat him like one. He's just a dude so out of touch that he doesn't bother with clothes. The film neither insults us by hiding it nor by tarting it up as some kind of porn. It's one of the healthiest depictions of ordinary nudity I've ever seen in the movies.

Agreed - I didn't even really pay much attention to that part.


pres man wrote:

One serious flaw with the new ending.

** spoiler omitted **

Spoiler:
What created Dr Manhattan was the removal of the "intrinsic field" which held his body together; the Intrinsic Field Subtractor isn't the source of his power, it's just what destroyed his body. His power source is never actually specified, but whatever it is, he and Adrian isolated it, and Adrian used it to destroy the cities. So there weren't more Dr Manhattans created because the energy which killed the people in the cities wasn't the same thing which killed Jon Osterman.

A couple more thoughts:

1. "You people just don't get it; I'm not stuck in here with you, you're stuck in here with me!"

2. Having not read the book, I was a bit confused when Ozymandias beat the pulp out of Rorschach and what's-his-name near the film's end. I was sure that he had found a way to Manhattan himself, thus enabling such a scrawny guy to kick so much butt. But then it turned out he was still just a smart guy, and I scratched my head for a moment.


Tequila Sunrise wrote:

A couple more thoughts:

1. "You people just don't get it; I'm not stuck in here with you, you're stuck in here with me!"

2. Having not read the book, I was a bit confused when Ozymandias beat the pulp out of Rorschach and what's-his-name near the film's end. I was sure that he had found a way to Manhattan himself, thus enabling such a scrawny guy to kick so much butt. But then it turned out he was still just a smart guy, and I scratched my head for a moment.

Rorschach's voice-over as he dropped off his journal & made his way to Antarctica with Owl made it pretty clear that Ozy was a serious bad-ass that he did NOT look forward to having to square off with, especially as he only had Owl with him for back up. (I think Rorschach wanted at least the rest of the Watchmen to make the beat-down workable.) By far smarter, REALLY fast ... what was not clear until the slobberknocker commenced was the sheer clobber-factor Ozy was also packing. Part of the reason Owl even got to bloody Ozy's face up a bit was because of the admission of guilt by Ozy, who had previously never killed anyone - and, even against Rorschach and Owl and Silk Spectre he refrained from inflicting serious injury (relatively speaking) in the hand-to-hand confrontation with his fellow Watchmen. Ozy basically threw Owl a bone (so to speak) as far as I could tell...

Rorschach was (for me) the most appealing character, with Ozy and Dr Manhattan as tied for 2nd not far behind him.

Liberty's Edge

wrt Ozy:

Spoiler:
He uses his int bonus for attacks and damage. ;)


Tequila Sunrise:

Spoiler:

Tequila Sunrise wrote:


2. Having not read the book, I was a bit confused when Ozymandias beat the pulp out of Rorschach and what's-his-name near the film's end. I was sure that he had found a way to Manhattan himself, thus enabling such a scrawny guy to kick so much butt. But then it turned out he was still just a smart guy, and I scratched my head for a moment.

He's the Perfect Man: perfect intelligence, perfect health, perfect beauty, perfect body and perfect training. He could beat any non-superhuman at anything. This wasn't conveyed very clearly in the movie, and the actor isn't quite up for it either.

Liberty's Edge

Oh, yeah....

Spoiler:
and on the pulp, Ozy looked waaaaaay more buffer. The guy in the movie was like David Spade doing an impression of Ozy or something.

Liberty's Edge

Tequila Sunrise wrote:

A couple more thoughts:

1. "You people just don't get it; I'm not stuck in here with you, you're stuck in here with me!"

you need to play the 360 retro live game to understand those words fully :P

also the guy has been pucnhing criminals (sometimes to the death) for a long time... he is not afraid of killing them... the only reason he doesn't is because they hadn't given him a reason.

Tequila Sunrise wrote:
2. Having not read the book, I was a bit confused when Ozymandias beat the pulp out of Rorschach and what's-his-name near the film's end. I was sure that he had found a way to Manhattan himself, thus enabling such a scrawny guy to kick so much butt. But then it turned out he was still just a smart guy, and I scratched my head for a moment.

Spoiler:
Ozymandias / Adrian Veidt: Drawing inspiration from Alexander the Great, Veidt was once the superhero Ozymandias, but has since retired to devote his attention to the running of his own enterprises. Veidt is believed to be one of the smartest men on the planet. Ozymandias was directly based on Peter Cannon, Thunderbolt, whom Moore had admired for using his full brain capacity as well as possessing full physical and mental control.[1] Richard Reynolds noted that by taking initiative to "help the world", Veidt displays a trait normally attributed to villains in superhero stories, and in a sense he is the "villain" of the series.[23] Gibbons noted "One of the worst of his sins [is] kind of looking down on the rest of humanity, scorning the rest of humanity."[24]from Wikipedia

it is not said in the movie... but the guy is master of about 11 martial arts... as a villain hescared the hell out of Roscraft... who is not easily scared...

Watchmen characters

reference taken from wikipedia

Ozymandias image

Contributor

In the book, Ozymandius represents the philosophy of Solipsism - that reality conforms to to what you believe. Thus through force-of-will he made himself the not just the smartest and richest, but also the most athletic man in the world.

Spoiler:
He also represents negative solipsism: controlling people by making them believe something that isn't strictly true.

Spoiler:
Maybe it's because I dislike the philosophy of solipsism, but I liked that in the book, even after he became the richest, smartest, strongest man, and brought about world peace, Veidt still needed approval from God/Superman/Dr. Manhattan. "I did the right thing, didn't I?"


Yeah his athleticism definitely didn't come across in the movie. He had the smart thing and the pretty boy thing going on but...yeah. Not that I expect much consistency in a movie where any shlub can go out and single handedly dispatch a gang of senselessly violent thugs just by putting on a halloween costume.


Erik Mona wrote:
Disenchanter wrote:
And we were even cheated on the bare breast scene.
Did you see the same movie I did?

Apparently not.

The movie I saw, the breasts looked fake. Not in the "tee-hee, silly actress thought she needed augmentation surgery," but in the "what the hell? Is she wearing a prosthetic chest?" kind of way.

Now, I certainly could be wrong... But the scenes where quick, chopped, and the actress did very little movement when her bare breasts were on the screen. All of which help support my theory rather that counter it.

When I get to see it at home, with the pause ability, I'll be able to verify.


Saw it Monday and although I almost failed a Constitution check at the end (shouldn't have had that large Mt Dew). I was blown away.

Translating a comic to the movie screen requires so many changes and adaptions; sound, music, the tone of how things are said, the lack of little boxes with additional information and just filling in between the comic panels, it's a miracle that any comic is successfully adapted.

But they did a great job and I can't wait for the extended DVD!

And while there were only about 6 of us in the theater for the afternoon showing, we were all in the same mindset.

When we saw Dollar Bill's death scene, we all said "No Capes!"
We were waiting for each classic line and when "The Watchtower" played as they aproached Karnak, we were all thinking, "Ozy is the fifth Cylon!"


Tequila Sunrise wrote:


2. Having not read the book, I was a bit confused when Ozymandias beat the pulp out of Rorschach and what's-his-name near the film's end. I was sure that he had found a way to Manhattan himself, thus enabling such a scrawny guy to kick so much butt. But then it turned out he was still just a smart guy, and I scratched my head for a moment.

Yeah his athleticism definitely didn't come across in the movie. He had the smart thing and the pretty boy thing going on but...yeah. Not that I expect much consistency in a movie where any shlub can go out and single handedly dispatch a gang of senselessly violent thugs just by putting on a halloween costume.

He didn't seem to have much problem with the assassin that shoots Lee Iacoca. I suppose technically he doesn't have superpowers but he is much closer to it than either Rorshach or Nite Owl.

Spoiler:
I hadn't read the book either but when I saw the Comedian torch Veidt's map, he was prime suspect #1. I had the whole "So that's the guy that beat the crap out of the Comedian!" moment when Nite Owl and Rorshach put everything together.

Liberty's Edge

Craig Clark wrote:

He didn't seem to have much problem with the assassin that shoots Lee Iacoca. I suppose technically he doesn't have superpowers but he is much closer to it than either Rorshach or Nite Owl.

** spoiler omitted **

good points Craig...

yes everyone had good resons to kill him... even Laurie they just didn't showed it in the movie... i suppose it went with the other 45 minutes of movie...

Spoiler:
i kind of remember he tried to rape her as he did with her mother until her mother entered and said it aloud... i think that even shocked him


Heathansson wrote:
TriOmegaZero wrote:
I was lucky to get into an advance screening at the Ft. Gordon theater last weekend. Definately worth the three hour wait. I agree that this is the best adaptation you can get in a movie barring a LotR-style production.
I had almost forgotten Ft. Gordon existed...

Wow! Ft. Gordon Theater... memories from 1994! Nothing like watching movies proceeded by the National Anthem and in camo fatigues. :)


Abraham spalding wrote:


5.> Did NOT like the ending... it felt off to me somehow, but at the same time the ending was entirely appropriate to the movie as presented. It's plot issues for me but that's me.

The ending was the one part of the movie I REALLY liked. I thought it was an exceptional way to present an arch-villain.

Spoiler:
He managed to save the world and remove 2 hero threats permanently AND only a slightly injured hand to show for it? NICE!
*cheers for a well portraited villain* (I've never read the books and went into the movie relatively open-minded.) Having heard tid-bits from friends who have read the book(s), I honestly think I prefer this ending to the original that apparently involved an alien invasion of some sort.

Rorschach's prison scene was also pretty awesome.

Dr. Mahattan's blue schlong wasn't an issue, but from a movie go'er stand point, unnecessary. It was relatively obvious that Manhattan and NightOwl2 had a lovers triangle with opposite qualities going on without the schlong. *shrugs* Whatever works, bring on the blue woman porn!


Daniel Moyer wrote:
The ending was the one part of the movie I REALLY liked. I thought it was an exceptional way to present an arch-villain.

Spoiler:
Ironically, you get the feeling in the book that all of his plans are for nothing, because Rorschach's book gets out and undoes his secret. People realize they have been played and go back to the way things were.
Daniel Moyer wrote:
Having heard tid-bits from friends who have read the book(s), I honestly think I prefer this ending to the original that apparently involved an alien invasion of some sort.

Spoiler:
Not a fan of Lovecraftian images?
51 to 100 of 136 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Gamer Life / Entertainment / Movies / Watchmen All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.