Using HC Campaign Setting Feats (and stuff) with PF Beta?

[Watcher]

This is mostly a question for Editorial, but any opinions welcome..

Has anyone vetted, or considered, the use of the Feats and Crunch in the Hard Cover Campaign Setting in their Beta-test games?

My assumption is that the compatibility is pretty high, because it was all in-house Paizo material. It was just that my beta-testers are calling out to use the HC Campaign setting material.. and I reminded them that it was technically a 3.5 book.

Any thoughts?

Maybe I'll get lucky and Doctor J will see this before my game starts in an hour....

[Watcher]

Bump?

Feats and stuff should port over cleanly?

[Paul Watson]

I honestly can't see any problem, except for the need to rework those prerequisites that rely on skills. But I haven't tested them under Beta myself, so I can't say for sure.

[Rauol_Duke]

I think I read somewhere that Mike had the Campaign Setting go through Jason to make sure that it was as Beta-compatible as possible, which it seems to be for the most part.

EDIT: Here it is!

Mike McArtor wrote:

Yup. In fact, I tried to be very cognizant of the PFRPG rules as they existed at the time we sent the book to the printer to make all the new rules presented in the Campaign Setting compatible not only with 3.5 but also with the PFRPG. I even forced Jason to do a quick compatibility check. In other words, unless things change drastically from the PFRPG beta to the final product, the actual answer to your question is: "Yes." In theory, it is both 3.5 and PFRPG. :)

no McArtor posted emoticons were harmed in the quoting of this text

[Watcher]

Thanks for the replies and the research guys.. I appreciate it.