I've been following this for a while and wanted to drop in my thoughts here as well as a comment on the blog itself
My AP sub has had issues since I moved due to changes in billing address. I wanted to get it started again but when I saw what AP was coming up I decided to hold off. The blog, while I think it does address some issues, is not enough for me to pick up from this AP. I'll wait for more community reviews and consider dropping back in later depending on a thorough assessment of how things are actually handled, or wait for the next cycle of APs in 6 months.
The blog admits to them having had opportunities early in the process to course correct, that weren't taken. That I think is my larger concern. What is being done to address the issues correctly recognised here about dismissing concerns about this early on in the process? This is what I'd like to see more detail on to be comfortable that Paizo are taking these issues seriously and have a strong commitment to addressing them. It's important to recognise that having some representation from marginalised groups doesn't automatically make you respectful or representative of all marginalised groups, and you have to work at that. I'd like to see them doing the work that I can be happy supporting, and would love to support that in future.