The Clockwork General

Innuendo Golem's page

7 posts. Alias of rpgsavant.


RSS


Bloat Creep wrote:
Sounds like a fun game of grab and poke to me!

HEH. HEH. HEH.


HE HE HE. SUCKS.


D0R1T0 wrote:

BELAY TERMINATION COMMAND

A SEARCH OF THIS UNIT'S MEMORY BANKS REVEALS THAT UNIT DESIGNATED MACARONI SLAAD EXCLAIMED "Rutabega!" WHILE UNIT DESIGNATED POTATO SLAAD EXCLAIMED "Rutabagas!" CLEARLY THERE IS NO CHAOS VIOLATION. HAVE A PLEASANT DAY.

HEH. HEH. HEH. VIOLATION.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Ashiel wrote:
Malachi Silverclaw wrote:

@ Jiggy: No-one likes to be psychoanalysed unless they've paid for the full hour! : )

The more accurate the analysis, the less they like it!

Blanket statements are usually wrong. I for one would love to be psychoanalyzed by Jiggy.

He he he.


He he he. Attention.

He he he. Bumps.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
littlehewy wrote:
VM mercenario wrote:
littlehewy wrote:

Lol what I'm saying is, don't waltz into a thread about the mechanical effectiveness of monks, claim that monks are perfectly fine and contribute well, get your argument shot to hell, then start your own thread suggesting that some people think PF is only about DPR.

It's offensive, as well as patently false. Don't do it.

I said that too. See:

VM mercenario wrote:
What does bother us is when someone presents a character that doesn't do much damage, doesn't contribute with any outstanding skill, and doesn't have any consistently useful abilities or spells and that can't survive any level appropriate encounter and says it's a mechanically viable character. You may be having fun, your grou may not have a problem and your DM may
...
As we say in Australia: Same dog, different leg :)

He he he.


Smug Narcissist wrote:
Dabbler wrote:
Predictable, isn't it?
Wanna know what the driving force behind this Thread is....it´s THIS

Hehehe...inflated self-love