| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Devil in Plain Sight is printed in Ancestry Guide.
The Remaster does not overwrite or invalidate that feat. Use the Tiefling -> Nephilim errata and continue using the existing rules.
|
wow, I'm allowed to use tiefling feats with the nephilim ancestry (the ones not overwritten in the remaster, anyway)? Is this a common sense rule or did paizo make this official somewhere?Devil in Plain Sight is printed in Ancestry Guide.
The Remaster does not overwrite or invalidate that feat. Use the Tiefling -> Nephilim errata and continue using the existing rules.
It is official for PFS as indicated on the entry about Nephilim on AoN :
PFS Note All Pathfinder agents have access this heritage. The nephilim trait is interchangeable with either the aasimar or tiefling trait and vice versa, but aasimar characters may not treat that trait as interchangeable with the tiefling trait (or vice versa).
| 3 people marked this as a favorite. |
In addition to the PFS ruling, there is also the Remaster Announcement blog post that says that the intent of the Remaster is not to remove existing content other than as is necessary for legal reasons (and even that is just removed or renamed in Paizo published documents - you can still use such things at home).
There are some things that may be tricky to make compatible, and the GM will have to make some adjudication about how to import them or whether to allow them at all. But those are few and far between. The only example I can think of at the moment is the Runelord Archetype - with the removal of school from spell tradition traits, it becomes difficult to know which spells fall into which of the categories affected by the archetype. Especially for the newer spells that don't have tradition traits in any printing. There are several ways of letting the archetype work, or the GM might ban it entirely.
But I don't think that Nephilim working with Tiefling ancestry feats runs into that type of difficulty.