|
Aklo is the Uncommon language of "Deros, evil fey, otherworldly monsters". Changelings are the children of hags.
Necril is the Uncommon language of "Ghouls, intelligent undead". Dhampir are humanoids.
While it could certainly be thematic for a Changeling to learn Aklo (or a Dhampir to learn Necril) via something like the Multilingual feat, I don't see evidence anywhere that those languages are innate to those Heritages.
| Thomas Keller |
Aklo is the Uncommon language of "Deros, evil fey, otherworldly monsters". Changelings are the children of hags.
Necril is the Uncommon language of "Ghouls, intelligent undead". Dhampir are humanoids.
While it could certainly be thematic for a Changeling to learn Aklo (or a Dhampir to learn Necril) via something like the Multilingual feat, I don't see evidence anywhere that those languages are innate to those Heritages.
Hags are evil fey. Vampires are intelligent undead.
|
Nefreet wrote:Hags are evil fey. Vampires are intelligent undead.Aklo is the Uncommon language of "Deros, evil fey, otherworldly monsters". Changelings are the children of hags.
Necril is the Uncommon language of "Ghouls, intelligent undead". Dhampir are humanoids.
While it could certainly be thematic for a Changeling to learn Aklo (or a Dhampir to learn Necril) via something like the Multilingual feat, I don't see evidence anywhere that those languages are innate to those Heritages.
And that's why I said it would certainly be thematic for Changelings and Dhampirs to learn those languages. Changelings are not evil fey, nor is every Changeling reared by a Hag. Dhampirs are not intelligent undead, nor is every Dhampir reared by a Vampire.
| Thomas Keller |
Thomas Keller wrote:And that's why I said it would certainly be thematic for Changelings and Dhampirs to learn those languages. Changelings are not evil fey, nor is every Changeling reared by a Hag. Dhampirs are not intelligent undead, nor is every Dhampir reared by a Vampire.Nefreet wrote:Hags are evil fey. Vampires are intelligent undead.Aklo is the Uncommon language of "Deros, evil fey, otherworldly monsters". Changelings are the children of hags.
Necril is the Uncommon language of "Ghouls, intelligent undead". Dhampir are humanoids.
While it could certainly be thematic for a Changeling to learn Aklo (or a Dhampir to learn Necril) via something like the Multilingual feat, I don't see evidence anywhere that those languages are innate to those Heritages.
You could say exactly the same thing about half-elves and half-orcs.
|
Nefreet wrote:You could say exactly the same thing about half-elves and half-orcs.Thomas Keller wrote:And that's why I said it would certainly be thematic for Changelings and Dhampirs to learn those languages. Changelings are not evil fey, nor is every Changeling reared by a Hag. Dhampirs are not intelligent undead, nor is every Dhampir reared by a Vampire.Nefreet wrote:Hags are evil fey. Vampires are intelligent undead.Aklo is the Uncommon language of "Deros, evil fey, otherworldly monsters". Changelings are the children of hags.
Necril is the Uncommon language of "Ghouls, intelligent undead". Dhampir are humanoids.
While it could certainly be thematic for a Changeling to learn Aklo (or a Dhampir to learn Necril) via something like the Multilingual feat, I don't see evidence anywhere that those languages are innate to those Heritages.
I actually cannot, because on the same page that tells us who speaks Aklo and Necril, we find:
Elven is the Common language of "Elves, half-elves".
Orcish is the Common language of "Orcs, half-orcs".
| Thomas Keller |
Thomas, please don't go down this road.
The difference is that orcish and elven are common languages.
An answer has been given. I, for one, don't mind being proven wrong and I admit when I am wrong.
So go prove us wrong about access to those uncommon languages.
I don't know what "road" you think I'm going down? I totally accept your answer. I just found Nefreet's reasoning faulty.
|
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
Gary Bush wrote:I don't know what "road" you think I'm going down? I totally accept your answer. I just found Nefreet's reasoning faulty.Thomas, please don't go down this road.
The difference is that orcish and elven are common languages.
An answer has been given. I, for one, don't mind being proven wrong and I admit when I am wrong.
So go prove us wrong about access to those uncommon languages.
I have found that most of the time Nefreet's reasoning fairly reasonable. But don't tell him that.
The road I was cautioning about was challenging Nefreet without having your ducks in a row.