Clarification needed on the meaning of a "Target"


Rules Discussion

101 to 105 of 105 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>

Gortle wrote:
Its probably a bad idea, but some groups like the challenge.

I mean you could say the same thing about the examples here.

... What does any of this have to do with targeting though?


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Squiggit wrote:
... What does any of this have to do with targeting though?

Wait. This thread was about the rules on targeting?


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Honestly I was pretty happy to see this thread go off-topic, the original topic was pretty silly.


breithauptclan wrote:


Wait. This thread was about the rules on targeting?

Oops. Sorry.

(Or 'Mission accomplished!' Haven't decided which one.)


Despite what the title says, I don't think that this thread has ever been about the rules for targeting the Heal spell. I think that the 3-action version completely overriding the 1-action version is clear enough. Trying to find a loophole in it is simply a symptom of a different problem.

101 to 105 of 105 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder Second Edition / Rules Discussion / Clarification needed on the meaning of a "Target" All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.