Sorcerer / Druid Multiclass?

[DefinitelynotJK]

Hey there everyone,

Just for a bit of context, after becoming a lil' burnt out from D&D5e me and my play group have decided to try out Pathfinder 2e. Whilst new, we've all got a good enough grasp on what's going on.

My current character concept is a Fungal Leshy who once was a familiar of a hag but after said hag dying (and the leshy promptly 'disposing' her remains), the leshy has obtained the Hag Bloodline and headed off for adventures.

What I'm stuck on is whether to go pure Hag Sorc or for flavor also dip into druid (a leshy with a leshy familiar sounds hilarious). However, the munchkin in me is uncertain whether that'll work effectively or not. With everyone else taking more tanky/dps roles, I'd like to buff/debuff/heal as a support.

Oh to quickly mention, Witch is also another option I could go for as my DM's allowed it. (How would a Witch/Sorc or Witch/Druid work, if at all?)

[Kyrone]

Both options do work and have their pros and cons.

Hag Sorcerer + Druids makes you less MAD, because Wisdom is a stat that you want anyway.

Hag Sorcerer + Witch (if Occult), makes you invest on Int but the Occult Spellcasting scales to Legendary together with the Sorcerer proficiency.

We don't Witch right now, but with Druid you would most likely want Focus spells like Goodberries and feats Thousand Faces.

[Watery Soup]

DefinitelynotJK wrote:

However, the munchkin in me is uncertain whether that'll work effectively or not. With everyone else taking more tanky/dps roles, I'd like to buff/debuff/heal as a support.

It's going to work a better for buffs and heal - which don't rely on your primary spellcasting ability - than debuffs - which do.

Storywise, I think it's great. Any character that players are passionate about, even if mechanically weak, is going to be a big plus to the playing group. The background is hilarious and so is the idea of having a leshy familiar.