Armor Ointment and Negative Armor Check Penalty


Rules Questions


2 people marked this as FAQ candidate.

I was looking into ways to reduce Armor Check Penalties for another thread and I came across Armor Ointment:

Armor Ointment wrote:
This thick lubricant makes the joints of armor move more freely. Applying the ointment takes 1 minute and reduces your armor’s armor check penalty by 1 (to a minimum of –1) for 8 hours.

1. Does that mean you would get a +1 to STR and DEX based skills?

2. If you weren't proficient with the armor would you get +1 to attack rolls?


That has got to be a typo. I'm going to FAQ it in hopes it gets errata.


That was pretty much my reaction as well, it seemed really odd. I've never encountered a situation where non-proficiency could be beneficial over proficiency.


It reduces the penalty (increasing the value) to a minimum penalty of -1 to the checks. No problem; intent is obvious; no need to FAQ.


So if you aren't proficient with armor and have a -1 ACP you get a +1 to attack and to STR and DEX skills but if you are proficient you only get the skill bonus?


A friend just explained it to me (I feel dumb now). The intent is that it can reduce an ACP of -2 or greater by 1. It will have no effect on ACPs of -1 or 0.


Oh, that makes sense.

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Rules Questions / Armor Ointment and Negative Armor Check Penalty All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in Rules Questions