Theoretical 'Fixes' for the Factions...


Pathfinder Society

51 to 59 of 59 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Sovereign Court 4/5 5/5 **** Venture-Lieutenant, Nebraska—Omaha

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Wei Ji the Learner wrote:
KingOfAnything wrote:

I'm curious how you managed that.

Personally, I like the Exchange for being a cooperation, not a perfect blend.

**Spoilered Explanation**

EDIT: On a completely different note, should also be noted that I was also at an exceptionally rare table of ** spoiler omitted **. When that sort of thing happens it's great to feel, but also a bit of a kick to the teeth to realize that 'something cool' has been lost by 'playing it well'.

Ahh. I actually thought the handouts were pretty clear that it was one way or the other. But, you do need to be sensitive to the somewhat gamist nature of faction missions/PFS scenarios.

Forged in Flame pt1:

Aaqir: If you think its citizens vulnerable to cheap thuggery, you may doom our endeavor before it’s truly begun

Guaril: He wants to play it safe, and if you want to retire decades from now with your own fruit stand to show for your work, maybe you should play in his sandbox.

Edit: I'm in for some bacon below!

Silver Crusade 1/5 Contributor

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Hilary Moon Murphy wrote:

Forged in Flame and 'Bacon' Below have now merged in my head into a scenario that starts with your VC bringing you in for a grilling.

Hmm

This is why we don't run tables on an empty stomach. ^_^

1/5 5/5

Pathfinder Lost Omens Subscriber
KingOfAnything wrote:


Ahh. I actually thought the handouts were pretty clear that it was one way or the other. But, you do need to be sensitive to the somewhat gamist nature of faction missions/PFS scenarios.

The problem is in part due to playing a lawyer-type character, but also in part because while it *seems* like those are cut and dried, there's no variation from 'DO THIS or DO THAT' when someone who's really trying to make the faction 'work' as an operational paradigm will 'DO both THIS and THAT'.

4/5 5/5 **** Venture-Captain, Massachusetts—Boston Metro

Wei Ji the Learner wrote:
MadScientistWorking wrote:


It's probably not going to happen as it's already a plotline to a scenario(s?). It's my favorite faction plotline just because it's so convoluted.
It's my least favorite in a recent few scenarios because it's too convoluted and unclear, and at least in my case, I ended up not getting credit for either route because I was trying to reach a 'happy blend' of both -- which isn't indicated as a thing to avoid in any suggestions given.

No not that plotline. The plotline which you described in your post is an actual PFS plotline.

Grand Lodge 4/5

I'm afraid you've lost me.

5/5 5/55/55/5

reminds me to make another shadowlodge pin for the upcomming gad-con...

Sovereign Court 4/5 5/55/55/55/5 ***** Venture-Captain, North Carolina—Central Region

KingOfAnything wrote:
Wei Ji the Learner wrote:
KingOfAnything wrote:

I'm curious how you managed that.

Personally, I like the Exchange for being a cooperation, not a perfect blend.

**Spoilered Explanation**

EDIT: On a completely different note, should also be noted that I was also at an exceptionally rare table of ** spoiler omitted **. When that sort of thing happens it's great to feel, but also a bit of a kick to the teeth to realize that 'something cool' has been lost by 'playing it well'.

Ahh. I actually thought the handouts were pretty clear that it was one way or the other. But, you do need to be sensitive to the somewhat gamist nature of faction missions/PFS scenarios.

** spoiler omitted **

Edit: I'm in for some bacon below!

Forged in Flame, part 1:
It sounds like your GM may actually have missed something then:

"Tally the number of times the PCs promoted one or the other, as summarized below. If the faction PCs pursued al’Hakam’s approach more (minimum two accomplishments), Exchange faction PCs earn the Zjarran Entrepreneur boon. If the faction PCs pursued Karela’s approach more (minimum two accomplishments), Exchange faction PCs earn the Shadow over Zjarra boon. If there’s a tie, each faction PC chooses which boon to earn." Formatting for emphasis

Grand Lodge 4/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Note the minimum requirements, Landon.

4/5 5/5 **** Venture-Captain, Massachusetts—Boston Metro

Steven Schopmeyer wrote:
I'm afraid you've lost me.

There is a stealth Exchange plotline that isn't listed as a Exchange scenario despite the antics revolving around are focused in that faction.

51 to 59 of 59 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Organized Play / Pathfinder Society / Theoretical 'Fixes' for the Factions... All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in Pathfinder Society