|
|
It is impossible to account for all possible interpretations when writing in any language other than mathematics.
Unless you're a writer, maybe don't slam the people who are just because you don't like something. (And if you are a writer, you should know better.)
Actually it isn't. In fact their is an entire field of writing which is the antithesis of what you are claiming doesn't exist. This is less slamming the Paizo because they have limited resources and more the people who think that its intentional.
|
|
| 7 people marked this as a favorite. |
So... this thread has served its actual purpose, correct? The original topic has been addressed?
If so, please continue the discussion of RAW vs. RAI - it's certainly a novel topic for the messageboards. I have no doubt that we can expect brilliant insights, since this topic is so rarely addressed here.
|
GM Lamplighter wrote:Actually it isn't. In fact their is an entire field of writing which is the antithesis of what you are claiming doesn't exist. This is less slamming the Paizo because they have limited resources and more the people who think that its intentional.It is impossible to account for all possible interpretations when writing in any language other than mathematics.
Unless you're a writer, maybe don't slam the people who are just because you don't like something. (And if you are a writer, you should know better.)
the best part of this post was your use of "their" for "there"... that was intentional right?
| Kitty Catoblepas |
Kitty Catoblepas wrote:Or RAMVORD (Rules as my version of reality dictates)Nefreet wrote:Good thing there's no such thing as "RAW".Likewise, there is no such thing as "RAI (Rules As Intended)".
There is only "RaI (Rules as Interpreted)."
There's also Rules As Badly Interpreted (Detrimentally).
Indeed, many a player has lost a character to a RABID GM.