| Gun Dragon |
I have made a level 8 Catfolk Skald. Her name is Fuzzy Love. I am gonna roleplay her like a bodybuilder dominatrix. 25 point build stats goes as follows, Str20, Dex14, Con16, Int14, Wis8, Cha18. She has a charisma headband +2. For rage powers I have taken celestial blood lesser and spirit totem. And for feats I have taken scalds vigor, Power attack, Hurtful, Cornugon smash.
For the other character I made a Oread unchained monk at 8th level. Her stats are Str20, Dex14, Con14, Int10, Wis16, Cha8. I haven't bought gear yet. For feats I have took Imp. Willpower and I need help picking the other 3? I have taken Crystalline Form for a small +2 ac against rays, I wanted to make her a transparent Amethyst Crystal. For monk class stuff I have taken Combat Reflexes, Dodge, Qinggong power Stone Shield ARG page 149, Defensive spin, Elemental Fury Acid, and Abundant step.
I can take Dimensional feats yet because the monks abundant step power has to be taken at level 8 or later. And do I want any certain monk weapon?
Weirdo
|
The catfolk does sound like more fun, though aren't the stats high for the point buy? Counting the +2 headband, racial +2 Dex +2 Cha -2 Wis, and assuming level increases in Str, you'd start with 18 (17), 12 (2), 16 (10), 14 (5), 10 (0), 14 (5) = 39 points. Or are these stats assuming raging song (which would mean a starting 14 Str and 12 Con for 5+2+2+5+0+5 points = 24)?
Sansetsukon (three-section staff) is a pretty good weapon for the unchained monk - it's a two-hander so you get the improved strength benefits, has a d10 damage die and 19-20 crit threat range, and also has the blocking and disarm properties.
Do you know what the rest of the party will be like?
| Oracle of Sunder |
I believe you miscalculated your Catfolk's point-buy...
Taking off her 4th and 8th lvl bonuses to Str and her +2cha headband leaves her: 18 14 16 14 08 16.
if I remove her Catfolk modifiers it leaves her after point-buy stats as: 18(17) 12(2) 16(10) 14(5) 10(0) 14(5).
which equals a 39pointbuy
11,12,13 each cost +1 point
14,15 cost 2 points each
16,17 cost 3 points
18,19 cost 4
etc... so going from 10 to 18 = a total of 17 points
I would buy her : 16 12 14 12 11 14.
So with bonuses she would be: 18 14 14 12 09 18
as for which to play...
without knowing your party makeup or what your GM plans to throw at you, I say play the catfolk. You have her fleshed out more and even have a plan how to role-play her. You can always flesh out the oread and play her in a different game.
| Arachnofiend |
Skalds are incredibly reliant on team composition to be useful. You want at least two other people who rely on strength, and you want neither of those people to be barbarians or magi. It's a great class in the, like, two parties that can use one effectively.
If you go with the Monk, the sansetsukon and nine-section whip are arguably the two best monk weapons.
| Gun Dragon |
I believe you miscalculated your Catfolk's point-buy...
Taking off her 4th and 8th lvl bonuses to Str and her +2cha headband leaves her: 18 14 16 14 08 16.
if I remove her Catfolk modifiers it leaves her after point-buy stats as: 18(17) 12(2) 16(10) 14(5) 10(0) 14(5).
which equals a 39pointbuy11,12,13 each cost +1 point
14,15 cost 2 points each
16,17 cost 3 points
18,19 cost 4
etc... so going from 10 to 18 = a total of 17 pointsI would buy her : 16 12 14 12 11 14.
So with bonuses she would be: 18 14 14 12 09 18as for which to play...
without knowing your party makeup or what your GM plans to throw at you, I say play the catfolk. You have her fleshed out more and even have a plan how to role-play her. You can always flesh out the oread and play her in a different game.
Just noticed your stats Is it better than my other stats?
| Rub-Eta |
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Her name is Fuzzy Love. I am gonna roleplay her like a bodybuilder dominatrix.
What? I'm sorry, but what? This sound really... not table friendly. I myself wouldn't want to (or have a player at my table) roleplay a dominatrix. The image I get from the word dominatrix isn't playable in any way or applicable to a game even, it would just get in the way.
The guard asks you what you're doing here. You crank your whip and tell him to beg like a dog to get an answer...?I don't mean to disrespect anybody's preferences or profession, but I don't see how this is a "good" idea at all, unless you're playing in a speciall game.
Also, the name makes me think that what you're going for is a medieval furry-pornstar. With all respects, keep your sexual preferences and fantasies out of the game (this is applies to everybody).
I vote for the monk.
Deadmanwalking
|
Gun Dragon wrote:Her name is Fuzzy Love. I am gonna roleplay her like a bodybuilder dominatrix.What? I'm sorry, but what? This sound really... not table friendly. I myself wouldn't want to (or have a player at my table) roleplay a dominatrix. The image I get from the word dominatrix isn't playable in any way or applicable to a game even, it would just get in the way.
What's wrong with roleplaying a dominatrix? People are more than the sum of their profession and sexual preferences. Such a character is very possible even in a more serious game.
Add that this is clearly a joke character, and, well your objection is pretty much completely invalid.
The guard asks you what you're doing here. You crank your whip and tell him to beg like a dog to get an answer...?
I don't mean to disrespect anybody's preferences or profession, but I don't see how this is a "good" idea at all, unless you're playing in a speciall game.
You're being fairly disrespectful anyway. Would you assume that a character whose profession was thief would try to steal the king's pants while talking to them or similar ridiculousness? Because that's what you're assuming: That a particular profession defines someone so totally they can't do or think anything outside it. Which is bullshit.
Also, the name makes me think that what you're going for is a medieval furry-pornstar. With all respects, keep your sexual preferences and fantasies out of the game (this is applies to everybody).
Wow. That's seriously judgmental in a 'You're having badwrongfun!' sorta way. Stop dictating what play styles are okay for other people.
Yes, definitionally, playing a character named 'Fuzzy Love' is both sexualized and ridiculous...but that's fine if the game isn't being taken entirely seriously.
Have you really never played a light-hearted 'beer and pretzels' kind of game where jokes like this (or poop jokes) are appropriate? Because they're not exactly uncommon...
| Green Smashomancer |
Yeah, I guess the question here is, what is the tone of the game? Is it serious? If not I'd advise against the Catfolk, especially if you aren't familiar with the other players already. Of course, all these things could be accounted for, and this character could be purfect for the game she'll be joining.
Also I giggled a little bit when I read the character name.
| Jaunt |
The problem I find with "beer and pretzels" games with zany and ridiculous characters is that the rest of the group is surprised as often as not.
If you want to play a ridiculous game, go for it, but make sure it's a ridiculous game before rocking up with a furry dominatrix. Or a special game, as the case may be.
Consider this another vote for monk.
Weirdo
|
Ok her stats are Str20, Dex12, Con14, Int14, Wis8, Cha18 with cha headband +2.
Oracle of Sunder wrote:Just noticed your stats Is it better than my other stats?I would buy her : 16 12 14 12 11 14.
So with bonuses she would be: 18 14 14 12 09 18
Yes, because Oracle's are correct. Your second array is still 32 points. Pre-racial starting 18s are expensive.
| Rub-Eta |
Rub-Eta wrote:What's wrong with roleplaying a dominatrix? People are more than the sum of their profession and sexual preferences.Gun Dragon wrote:Her name is Fuzzy Love. I am gonna roleplay her like a bodybuilder dominatrix.What? I'm sorry, but what? This sound really... not table friendly. I myself wouldn't want to (or have a player at my table) roleplay a dominatrix. The image I get from the word dominatrix isn't playable in any way or applicable to a game even, it would just get in the way.
Yes, I agree with you. Dominatrix is a profession and a profession only. But when someone says that they're going to roleplay their character as a dominatrix I get the image that they're keeping that act up all the time, not only as a profession (the name adds to my suspiciousness as well).
Add that this is clearly a joke character, and, well your objection is pretty much completely invalid.
"It's a satire" or "It's a joke" is not a valid excuse in every case.
Rub-Eta wrote:You're being fairly disrespectful anyway. Would you assume that a character whose profession was thief would try to steal the king's pants while talking to them or similar ridiculousness? Because that's what you're assuming: That a particular profession defines someone so totally they can't do or think anything outside it. Which is b$$*%*&+.The guard asks you what you're doing here. You crank your whip and tell him to beg like a dog to get an answer...?
I don't mean to disrespect anybody's preferences or profession, but I don't see how this is a "good" idea at all, unless you're playing in a speciall game.
Again, what I said earlier (I was thinking about including it in my original post): What you're saying is that playing a character with dominatrix as a profession is possible, I agree. But that's not what it sound like from the OP (with a name like that). I never said that I would assume something like that about a thief character. I would if it was, as you mentioned, a joke character. And as you mentioned as well, this is clearly a joke character. So let me ask you: How is it even disrespectful to assume this about a JOKE CHARACTER?
Rub-Eta wrote:Also, the name makes me think that what you're going for is a medieval furry-pornstar. With all respects, keep your sexual preferences and fantasies out of the game (this is applies to everybody).Wow. That's seriously judgmental in a 'You're having badwrongfun!' sorta way. Stop dictating what play styles are okay for other people.
Not at all what I wanted to do. It probably didn't come thru before, but I am aware that this may not be the sexual preferences and fantasies of anybody in this thread. But what I've gathred from many other threads on this forum is that the general consensus about sexual preferences and fantasies is that they're to be kept out of the game.
Yes, definitionally, playing a character named 'Fuzzy Love' is both sexualized and ridiculous...but that's fine if the game isn't being taken entirely seriously.
Have you really never played a light-hearted 'beer and pretzels' kind of game where jokes like this (or poop jokes) are appropriate? Because they're not exactly uncommon...
As the two original presented character concepts seem to be two very different, I assumed that the game they're playing isn't the 'beer and pretzels' type of game (as the Oread Monk would still have to fit the part). And as I said, unless it's a speciall game (what you refer to as 'beer and pretzels' type of game), it's not a good idea to do poop jokes.