| DundjinnMasta |
I am considering running an Age of Worms campaign, but I have no interest in using Pathfinder or D&D 3.x/4E/5E.
I currently have three choices in mind for the campaign.
Adventurer, Conqueror, King
Sword and Wizardry Complete
AD&D 2E
Just testing the waters for popularity of these systems and the Age of Worms which is one of the most "throwback" of all the APs ever released (and my personal favorite).
Sword and Wizardry Complete has a more extension list of Monsters.
Adventure, Conqueror, King has a rather interesting choice of classes between the main book and companion which I liked.
And AD&D 2E is a system I have a familiarity with (atleast formerly) and is a complete game with all the splat books.
| Logan1138 |
I, for one, would not be opposed to trying out a game of Swords & Wizardry.
I never did get to try first edition; taking a retro-clone out for a spin might be fun.
Technically, S&W is a retro-clone for Original D&D (aka 0E) not 1E which is AD&D. The retro-clone for 1E is OSRIC.
/pedantic thread derail
| DundjinnMasta |
Yeah. The complete version. Though I am not sure if I have the revised. I'll check when I get home.
And since you can get the FGG version which is the complete version here on Paizo for free that is even more reason to go with Sword & Wizardry.
I'll post up the recruitment thread tonight after I have a chance to type up the game description and information.