Soul Reaver
|
Hello there! I have another little question about how something works. I have a brawler character, which like monks, use a different damage die for unarmed damage which goes up as he levels up.
Now, since a normal unarmed strike deals 1d3, but with a cestus it deals 1d4, i was wondering what would happen if a brawler (or monk) of lets say, level 1, used a cestus.
would it deal 1d4 because it's a cestus, 1d6 because brawlers/monks deal 1d6 with unarmed, or would it deal 1d8, because
1d3 -> 1d4 is one step higher and 1d6 -> 1d8 is one step higher.
i've been looking around on google all over the place but i never found exactly the answer i've been looking for. many thanks for your time :3
Aydin D'Ampfer
|
Hello there! I have another little question about how something works. I have a brawler character, which like monks, use a different damage die for unarmed damage which goes up as he levels up.
Now, since a normal unarmed strike deals 1d3, but with a cestus it deals 1d4, i was wondering what would happen if a brawler (or monk) of lets say, level 1, used a cestus.would it deal 1d4 because it's a cestus, 1d6 because brawlers/monks deal 1d6 with unarmed, or would it deal 1d8, because
1d3 -> 1d4 is one step higher and 1d6 -> 1d8 is one step higher.i've been looking around on google all over the place but i never found exactly the answer i've been looking for. many thanks for your time :3
A cestus, despite the logic behind it, does only its damage (and crit range). If a character has an unarmed strike damage, like the monk or brawler, then they must declare they are attacking with that instead of the cestus. Treat the censtus as you would a dagger or sword, and not as an extension of the brawler/monk's fists.
This is in place primarily to prevent monks from spending 5 gold and getting keen fists.
Edit: Relevent Links
And for those unfamiliar, SKR is a Dev, so his word is effectively errata.
| BadBird |
It's certainly clear that the cestus, like a gauntlet or brass knuckles, doesn't use any modified unarmed strike damage. For things like style feats or Domain Strike it isn't nearly as clear.
What's funny - or maybe kind of embarassing - about that SKR post is that in his zeal, he manages to completely steamroll right over the fact that - as far as a gauntlet goes - the text explicitly states that "A strike with a gauntlet is otherwise considered an unarmed attack." It's one of those developer posts that kind of highlights why they're in that 'official-unofficial' no-man's land until something is actually thought through and posted officially. He's got a full head of steam going about what something 'should' say, but then...
It's five years later. And nothing has changed in print or PRD regarding the fact that if a cestus isn't functionally considered an unarmed strike at least in the abstract, then it has a good, hearty paragraph of utter nonsense attached to it. And regardless of what a gauntlet 'should' be, the text remains completely unambiguous about what it is.