Bard (Arcane Duelist) Decision: Glitterdust or UMD: Wand of Faerie Fire?


Advice


Glitterdust is a great spell!
BUT... with Use Magic Device (UMD) my understanding is that it's possible to buy a spell that is similar in function fairly cheaply while freeing up a Known Spell Slot for other purposes - i.e. a Wand of Faerie Fire for 750GP (50 charges)

I'm looking for a strong advocate of Glitterdust to convince me to take it over a Wand of Faerie Fire.

I'm aware that UMD is not a guarantee.
I'm aware that Glitterdust has no Spell Resistance
I'm aware that Glitterdust can Blind on a failed Will Save,.. but frankly,.. I'm not convinced it's *that much* stronger than Faerie Fire.

Alternatively, I'm looking for Faerie Fire fan-boys/girls to be proponents of my choice.

As it stands now, Faerie Fire looks to be a better choice until such time as Spell Resistance opponents become more frequent (Level 15+) - in which case I might swap out a spell for Glitterdust or use the Human Favored Class ability to add-on Glitterdust instead of taking another Hit Point.

Thoughts?

Sovereign Court

If you know the spell yourself, you don't have to juggle around a wand; you're already juggling enough other things like your bonded object.


Glitterdust affects a 10 ft radius and imposes a -40 Stealth penalty. Faerie Fire affects a 5 ft radius and imposes a -20 penalty. GD also bypasses SR.

If the goal is to reveal an invisible foe (and you don't have See Invisibility), I think Glitterdust is the better choice.

If the goal is to negate miss chance from blur, darkness, displacement, or invisibility, I'd choose Faerie Fire.


Marius Castille wrote:

Glitterdust affects a 10 ft radius and imposes a -40 Stealth penalty. Faerie Fire affects a 5 ft radius and imposes a -20 penalty. GD also bypasses SR.

If the goal is to reveal an invisible foe (and you don't have See Invisibility), I think Glitterdust is the better choice.

If the goal is to negate miss chance from blur, darkness, displacement, or invisibility, I'd choose Faerie Fire.

I like how you accentuated the difference between the two spells - each focused on a different goal with some overlap between the two.

Great point on radius, Marius. For some reason I erroneously thought Glitterdust targeted 4 squares whereas Faerie Fire targeted a 5 ft radius - effectively the same thing, but with different wording. My bad.

To your point...

As per Faerie Fire:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Area creatures and objects within a 5-ft.-radius burst

As per Glitterdust:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Area creatures and objects within 10-ft.-radius spread.

I'm an old school 3.5 player just starting Pathfinder.

Does this hold true?
5' radius = 4 squares
10'radius = 8 squares
http://rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/19400/what-is-a-radius-on-a-square-g rid

Also should be noted, one is a burst (is blocked by corners) while the other is a spread (rounds corners).

It should be noted...
Glitterdust lasts rounds/lvl whereas Faerie Fire lasts minutes/lvl.

IF I were invisible and targeted by a Glitterdust, THEN I'd run away for a few rounds until the GD duration ended (assuming I made my save vs. blindness). I would argue it'd be harder for me to escape if I had been targeted by a Faerie Fire seeing as the duration is as long as it is.

I don't know how common invisible creatures are in Pathfinder. This having been said, I already have one of my old favorite feats - Blindfight- at the ready.

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Advice / Bard (Arcane Duelist) Decision: Glitterdust or UMD: Wand of Faerie Fire? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.