Reach attack question....


Rules Questions

Shadow Lodge

Can a person with a long spear attack from the position he moved to and if so are there any penalties?

Set up:
Dismounted horse is in the middle of the battle, we'll use it as center. Clock wise around the horse, far left front to far right front 1, 2, 3, 4. Down right side 5, 6. Back 7, 8, 9, 10. Up left side 11, 12.

Creature is in position 12
Dismounted Player is in position 10
Mounted long spear Player moves mount to positions 8 ,9.

Can long spear Player attack creature?

Grand Lodge

I don't understand the first paragraph, sorry, unless it should be at the end?

I'm not sure of the relevance of the Dismounted Player, who isn't in a position to provide cover, threaten or do anything else to the Creature.

If Mounted Player wielding a longspear moves his mount so that the nearest square of his mount is 10 feet from Creature, he can attack Creature with no penalties (and a +1 higher ground bonus).


I attempted to reply, but kept getting confused when reading the post again, and again, so I just deleted my response. I don't understand the relevance of the dismounted player, and if the mount moved 5 ft back, or 10 feet back to 9 and 8.

If the mount moved 5 feet back, then no, because you threaten 10 ft with a reach weapon.

If the mount moved 10 feet back, then it would threaten.
o's=where the mount used to be
C=Creature
P=dismounted player
X's=Horse with long spear dude on it.
Q=Number 11, due to it taking two characters
e=other empty spaces

1234
Coo5
Qoo6
Pxx7
exxe


I believe this is how things threaten in PF in this situation. Be mindful that people argue the corners do threaten from what I hear, but I recall PF making them not legal to threaten do to them being 15 ft. but people argue since it's also 10 ft sort of, that you can.

n=non-threatened square
t=threaten square
x=space player takes up

nttttn
tnnnnt
tnxxnt
tnxxnt
tnnnnt
nttttn

Shadow Lodge

Lets see if I can make it clearer.

C=creature
H=horse
M=mounted long spear player
E=empty space
X=other player

CHH
EHH
XMM
EMM

Doe this help and/or chane anything?


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Alright, I figured the mounted long spear dude was on the horse in the middle. Now things make sense to me.

The creature gets +4 cover bonus to AC I believe, due to the horse being in between the spear dude, and the creature. I'm not experienced with mounted combat, but if there is a height advantage from this attack due to the creature being medium sized, and the long spear dude being on a large sized creature, then obviously that bonus applied to the attack roll.


I'm not sure, but he should have a soft cover, so +4.

If you're talking about an attack of opportunity for dismounting, than he don't have any cover yet.

If you speak about an attack of opportunity for other reason, you can't:
If he has cover, you can't make an attack of opportunity on him

CRB, Combat, cover wrote:
Cover and Attacks of Opportunity: You can't execute an attack of opportunity against an opponent with cover relative to you.

Now, to determine cover, there are 2 rules for a mounted character to have:

Relevant rules:

CRB, combat, Cover wrote:
To determine whether your target has cover from your ranged attack, choose a corner of your square. If any line from this corner to any corner of the target's square passes through a square or border that blocks line of effect or provides cover, or through a square occupied by a creature, the target has cover (+4 to AC).
CRB, Combat, Cover wrote:
Big Creatures and Cover: Any creature with a space larger than 5 feet (1 square) determines cover against melee attacks slightly differently than smaller creatures do. Such a creature can choose any square that it occupies to determine if an opponent has cover against its melee attacks. Similarly, when making a melee attack against such a creature, you can pick any of the squares it occupies to determine if it has cover against you.

Edit about the bonus on attack roll:

The bonus to hit is for being on higher ground. You only get a +1 to attack rolls.


A long spear is a reach weapon. Reach weapons use range weapon rules to determinate cover. You can choose a corner of the square occupied by your player and draw lines to determinate cover.

Grand Lodge

3 people marked this as a favorite.

Because of the actual way cover works, as shown, M would be able to attack C, no cover from H. He can check for cover from M's upper left corner, and there is no cover from that corner to C. No more than if H were a set of walls instead of a creature.

Silver Crusade

Kinevon got it. At first glance I, too, thought C would have soft cover. Nope. M has soft cover from C, but C does not have soft cover from M.

Shadow Lodge

So if your mounted you use the horse to determine where attack come from not the rider who is supposed to be in the middle of the square. This is what I was wondering about. A mounted person will figure attack from the mounts square?

Shadow Lodge

So no cover for anyone from this diagram?

W = Wall

C = creature

A = attacker

WWW
CWWW
A

These are medium creatures.


Reach weapon uses use the cover rules for ranged weapons.

CRB p195 wrote:
To determine whether your target has cover from your ranged attack, choose a corner of your square. If any line from this corner to any corner of the target’s square passes through a square or border that blocks line of effect or provides cover, or through a square occupied by a creature, the target has cover (+4 to AC).

A mounted creature occupies the same space that his mount occupies.

CRB p202 wrote:
For simplicity, assume that you share your mount’s space during combat.

Summary: in your example the rider using a reach weapon can choose which corner of his mount's space to attack from (assume top-left) and check for cover using the ranged weapon rules which determine that "C" has no cover because of the "E" square being empty.

In your last diagram neither A nor C have cover relative to each other. There are no other creatures to check.

Shadow Lodge

That diagram didnt turn out right...

W wall
C creature
A attacker
O blank space.

OWWW
OWWW
CWWW
OAOO


In your corrected diagram "C" and "A" have cover relative to each other.

Shadow Lodge

Even if A has a reach weapon?


Jacob Saltband wrote:
Even if A has a reach weapon?

A cant attack because reach weapons cant attack fields next to the attacker.

Silver Crusade

DEXRAY wrote:
Jacob Saltband wrote:
Even if A has a reach weapon?
A cant attack because reach weapons cant attack fields next to the attacker.

True, but there's still no cover. A can't attack, because it's too close to use a reach weapon, but there's no cover.


Jacob Saltband, in your last example if A has a reach weapon then A cannot attack (too close).

A still has cover relative to C when C attacks.

Whether C has cover relative to A depends on what A is doing. If A makes a ranged attack then C does not have cover. If A makes a non-reach melee attack then C has cover.

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Rules Questions / Reach attack question.... All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in Rules Questions