Power Attack Monk


Advice


Sooo . . . assuming you have the requisite STR is power attack worth it for a monk.


Gnomezrule wrote:
Sooo . . . assuming you have the requisite STR is power attack worth it for a monk.

At best, only when flurrying or when you're getting some other big increase to your hit chance (inspire courage, prone opponent, etc). I'm not a fan of Power Attack on 3/4 BAB characters.


In my experience . . . ehh, maybe? The monk's main problem is his accuracy and power attack reduces that even further. Though it might be useful as a pre-req for other feats. On my current monk, I snagged it as a Qinggong power, but only because I didn't want to waste a feat slot for something I'd only occasionally use.


If you have a pocket arcane caster throwing up heroism or Greater heroism on you all the time it's very worth it.
Also at higher levels it's easier to get custom magic items made to focus on your accuracy more.

Scarab Sages

3 people marked this as a favorite.

Power attack is one of the most over-rated feats on the boards. there are times when it's worth it, but for anyone that is using TWF, the accuracy hit means you will miss on iterative attacks that would have made up for the small boost to damage.

I much prefer Arcane Strike as a method to add static damage on a Monk, and you qualify for it with Qinggong even if you don't have a racial SLA. Yes you can't use it and a Ki Point on the same round, but Ki points are limited, and Arcane Strike is not.


If you are flurrying two handing a temple sword (or whatever) it is worth it, specially when paired with furious focus.


Imbicatus wrote:

Power attack is one of the most over-rated feats on the boards. there are times when it's worth it, but for anyone that is using TWF, the accuracy hit means you will miss on iterative attacks that would have made up for the small boost to damage.

I much prefer Arcane Strike as a method to add static damage on a Monk, and you qualify for it with Qinggong even if you don't have a racial SLA. Yes you can't use it and a Ki Point on the same round, but Ki points are limited, and Arcane Strike is not.

Agreed on Arcane Strike. Its a great little damage boost.

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

What races are allowed?

What books are allowed?

What is the point buy?


There are times when you are flanking, the enemy is prone, you're hasted, and you have heroism (or combinations thereof). Those are the times you wish you had flurry and power attack.

Also when flurrying you cannot 2h a temple sword. Well describe it how you wish, but it get's x1str and 1-2 PA

Scarab Sages

Beopere wrote:
Also when flurrying you cannot 2h a temple sword. Well describe it how you wish, but it get's x1str and 1-2 PA

This is untrue. You absolutely can two-hand the weapon, and while you don't get the bonus STR damage, you do get the bonus PA damage.

In fact, you may get even more extra PA damage since you use your full Flurry BAB to determine your PA bonus.

Grand Lodge

Generally for a Monk Getting Arcane strike is a good thing via Qinggong or racial SLA for a Monk. Another route is Dragon style/ferocity style feats. I would try for the first 2 before grabbing power attack IMO.

Scarab Sages

Fruian Thistlefoot wrote:
Generally for a Monk Getting Arcane strike is a good thing via Qinggong or racial SLA for a Monk. Another route is Dragon style/ferocity style feats. I would try for the first 2 before grabbing power attack IMO.

Depends on what you want to do. Dragon Style only applies to unarmed strikes (and possibly a natural attack with Feral Combat Training), and carries more prereqs than Power Attack for most builds. If you're planning on going the Unarmed Strike route though, I agree, I'd probably go with Dragon Style.

What's nice is that you can combo them up and get the -1/+3 damage on your monk unarmed strikes.

Grand Lodge

The other advantage to flurrying two handed with a temple sword is that it is possible to get Masterwork for the bonus at low level and cheaper to enchant and you can have different version with adamantine, silver or cold iron.

Given that at say lvl 12 you could have 2d6 fist or a 1d8 temple sword the difference in damage is 3 points. at level 12 when power attacking its + 8 damage on the unarmed and + 12 on the sword meaning on average the sword does more damage. Include that at level 12 you could have an AoMF +3 (36000) or an adamantine +4 temple sword (35000) will further increase your damage and accuracy. +5 is in reach at that level (50000) on the sword but AoMF +5 (100000) not so much.

Even at level 20 when you base damage is 2d10 (or at 16 with the robe) the extra damage from the higher enchant will make the sword more viable and combined with power attack (+10 vs. +15 at 16th, or +12 vs. +18 at 20th) you will see a noticeble difference. Espcially when you can enchant your sword with up to +10 effects but the AoMF is limited to +5.

Scarab Sages

Ssalarn wrote:
Fruian Thistlefoot wrote:
Generally for a Monk Getting Arcane strike is a good thing via Qinggong or racial SLA for a Monk. Another route is Dragon style/ferocity style feats. I would try for the first 2 before grabbing power attack IMO.

Depends on what you want to do. Dragon Style only applies to unarmed strikes (and possibly a natural attack with Feral Combat Training), and carries more prereqs than Power Attack for most builds. If you're planning on going the Unarmed Strike route though, I agree, I'd probably go with Dragon Style.

What's nice is that you can combo them up and get the -1/+3 damage on your monk unarmed strikes.

No you can't. Dragon Style does not make you unarmed strikes two-handed. It does give you a specific 1.5 STR bonus on your first unarmed strike per round and an additional .5 str bonus on all unarmed strikes per round. While that is functionally the same damage bonus as a two-handed weapon, unarmed strikes are still light weapons and will only give you -1/+2 on Power Attack.

Dragon style doesn't affect power attack at all.

Grand Lodge

I still don't see how you Flurry with 2 hands on a weapon.

Quote:

Starting at 1st level, a monk can make a flurry of blows as a full-attack action.

When doing so, he may make one additional attack, taking a –2 penalty on all of his attack rolls, as if using the Two-Weapon Fighting feat.

I take "as if using the Two-weapon fighting feat." as you can not 2 hand anything because when you normally use 2 weapon fighting you can't 2 hand both weapons. But if there is some goofy way to break the rules these forums will come up with a way.

Grand Lodge

And I mentioned dragon style as just a way to increase damage to a monks Unarmed strikes. Instead of using Power attack and taking negatives to hit just go with dragon style or Arcane strike where it just adds to damage.


blackbloodtroll wrote:

What races are allowed?

What books are allowed?

What is the point buy?

Well I piked aasimar plumekith.

Any book with approval but heavily favoring PF.
25 point buy.


Why take power attack when dragon style is there to eat up your feats? It just gives more. Later on at 7th WF becomes what one would get to increase your hit. 9th maybe, but arcane strike is better without the to hit problems.

Basically as a monk your hit is the weak point, you are a TWF and start off at -2 to hit, because of MAD, strength is probably 16 maybe 14, your weapon increases cost more.

There are so many things going against a monk for hit, it's the thing to shore up as much and as fast as possible. The rare time when it will make sense, you could be using something you can make use of every time - this will give you better mileage.


I was actually thinking power attack with dragon style.


Fruian Thistlefoot wrote:

I still don't see how you Flurry with 2 hands on a weapon.

Quote:

Starting at 1st level, a monk can make a flurry of blows as a full-attack action.

When doing so, he may make one additional attack, taking a –2 penalty on all of his attack rolls, as if using the Two-Weapon Fighting feat.

I take "as if using the Two-weapon fighting feat." as you can not 2 hand anything because when you normally use 2 weapon fighting you can't 2 hand both weapons. But if there is some goofy way to break the rules these forums will come up with a way.

It is not breaking a rule. It is explicitely stated in the last FAQ about the flurry of blow FAQ fiasco. So, it is a long story but it is legal.


Gnomezrule wrote:
I was actually thinking power attack with dragon style.

That case it woudl not be that good since unarmed strikes are harder to enchant than a temple sword, also no furious focus. Only use power attack when you are facing moob or heavy buffed, that is my advice.

Scarab Sages

Imbicatus wrote:
Ssalarn wrote:


Depends on what you want to do. Dragon Style only applies to unarmed strikes (and possibly a natural attack with Feral Combat Training), and carries more prereqs than Power Attack for most builds. If you're planning on going the Unarmed Strike route though, I agree, I'd probably go with Dragon Style.
What's nice is that you can combo them up and get the -1/+3 damage on your monk unarmed strikes.

No you can't. ***

Dragon style doesn't affect power attack at all.

I would disagree.

A monk's unarmed strike is treated as both a manufactured weapon and a natural weapon for the purpose of spells and effects that enhance or improve either manufactured weapons or natural weapons.

This bonus to damage is increased by half (+50%) if you are making an attack with a two-handed weapon, a one handed weapon using two hands, or a primary natural weapon that adds 1-1/2 times your Strength modifier on damage rolls.

You can add 1-1/2 times your Strength bonus on unarmed strike damage.

For further reference on rulings regarding what counts as augmenting an unarmed strike

Grand Lodge

Quote:
It is explicitely stated in the last FAQ about the flurry of blow FAQ fiasco.

Can you point me to the FAQ and official Piazo Errata ruling on it? I like to check the official ruling and not just the general consensus of a online argument.

No offense or anything.

Scarab Sages

Fruian Thistlefoot wrote:
Quote:
It is explicitely stated in the last FAQ about the flurry of blow FAQ fiasco.

Can you point me to the FAQ and official Piazo Errata ruling on it? I like to check the official ruling and not just the general consensus of a online argument.

No offense or anything.

FAQ .

Monk Weapons that are 2-handed weapons: Quarterstaff, Monk's Spade, Sansetsukon, Tiger Fork, Bo Staff, Double-chained Kama, Kusarigama, Kyoketsu Shoge, Seven-branched Sword

Evidence would indicate that you can absolutely two-hand a weapon while flurrying, as there are a number of weapons that are specifically two-handed and marked as being viable weapons for a flurry.


Fruian Thistlefoot wrote:

I still don't see how you Flurry with 2 hands on a weapon.

Quote:

Starting at 1st level, a monk can make a flurry of blows as a full-attack action.

When doing so, he may make one additional attack, taking a –2 penalty on all of his attack rolls, as if using the Two-Weapon Fighting feat.

I take "as if using the Two-weapon fighting feat." as you can not 2 hand anything because when you normally use 2 weapon fighting you can't 2 hand both weapons. But if there is some goofy way to break the rules these forums will come up with a way.

Actually, it's specifically mentioned in the base monk ability: Flurry of Blows...

PRD on Monks wrote:

Fourth paragraph starts:

A monk applies his full Strength bonus to his damage rolls for all successful attacks made with flurry of blows, whether the attacks are made with an off-hand or with a weapon wielded in both hands.

Scarab Sages

Fruian Thistlefoot wrote:
Quote:
It is explicitely stated in the last FAQ about the flurry of blow FAQ fiasco.

Can you point me to the FAQ and official Piazo Errata ruling on it? I like to check the official ruling and not just the general consensus of a online argument.

No offense or anything.

FAQ link Since you can make all attacks with a single weapon, there is nothing stopping you from using that weapon in two hands. Flurry of Blos overrides the two handed damage bonus for STR, but it is still a two-handed weapon and qualifies for the power attack damage, even if it is being used in one hand per this FAQ.

Scarab Sages

Sniggevert wrote:


Actually, it's specifically mentioned in the base monk ability: Flurry of Blows...

PRD on Monks wrote:

Fourth paragraph starts:

A monk applies his full Strength bonus to his damage rolls for all successful attacks made with flurry of blows, whether the attacks are made with an off-hand or with a weapon wielded in both hands.

...And the svirfneblin brings it in with a slam dunk! Who knew those stubby little legs could get that kind of air?


Sniggevert wrote:
Fruian Thistlefoot wrote:

I still don't see how you Flurry with 2 hands on a weapon.

Quote:

Starting at 1st level, a monk can make a flurry of blows as a full-attack action.

When doing so, he may make one additional attack, taking a –2 penalty on all of his attack rolls, as if using the Two-Weapon Fighting feat.

I take "as if using the Two-weapon fighting feat." as you can not 2 hand anything because when you normally use 2 weapon fighting you can't 2 hand both weapons. But if there is some goofy way to break the rules these forums will come up with a way.

Actually, it's specifically mentioned in the base monk ability: Flurry of Blows...

PRD on Monks wrote:

Fourth paragraph starts:

A monk applies his full Strength bonus to his damage rolls for all successful attacks made with flurry of blows, whether the attacks are made with an off-hand or with a weapon wielded in both hands.

This too is pretty conclusive.


Imbicatus wrote:

No you can't. Dragon Style does not make you unarmed strikes two-handed. It does give you a specific 1.5 STR bonus on your first unarmed strike per round and an additional .5 str bonus on all unarmed strikes per round. While that is functionally the same damage bonus as a two-handed weapon, unarmed strikes are still light weapons and will only give you -1/+2 on Power Attack.

Dragon style doesn't affect power attack at all.

I think the argument here is due to the fact that the unarmed strike is also considered a natural attack. And power attack has a clause discussing natural attacks that get 1.5xstr bonus. Not necessarily agreeing with this logic (although...but desire for power does like it), I'm just saying it is not unfounded. (oh, ninja'd)

And dragon style feats are a bit weird any way. I mean, with the thing I brought up above: even if you followed that line of though, it would not affect the bonuses on the hits affected by the second feat, since that doesn't give you 1.5x str....but an additional .5x on top of your 1x str bonus.......

Anyway, with all this discussion, how do people feel about the sohei in all this? It is a monk archetype that gets a bit of weapon training to help with accuracy and access to light armored flurry due to a FAQ. With furious focus to cover non-flurry attacks, and the false full BAB of flurry for full attacks, would they work well with power attack? Particularly since they can do it with reach weapons.

Scarab Sages

lemeres wrote:
***Anyway, with all this discussion, how do people feel about the sohei in all this? It is a monk archetype that gets a bit of weapon training and access to light armored flurry due to a FAQ. With furious focus to cover non-flurry attacks, and the false full BAB of flurry for full attacks, would they work well with power attack?

Their Weapon Training would help compensate for the penalties, so yeah, they'd get solid use out of Power Attack. Considering their facility with mounted combat they may have more reason to take PA than just about any other monk archetype.

Scarab Sages

lemeres wrote:


Anyway, with all this discussion, how do people feel about the sohei in all this? It is a monk archetype that gets a bit of weapon training and access to light armored flurry due to a FAQ. With furious focus to cover non-flurry attacks, and the false full BAB of flurry for full attacks, would they work well with power attack?

It would work, as The weapon Training/Gloves of Dueling let you add more accuracy, and Furious Focus makes sure the first hit will hit hard.

I also think the Sensei would be a good power attack user, as they have Inspire Courage to help accuracy, and being wisdom primary, they will likely have a higher attack stat than most monks due to being SAD vs MAD.


Ever since the FAQ about them and armor, I always felt sohei were the easiest monks to work with when you are not a master optimizer. I mean, if you grabbed armor expert, they could even grab a mithral breastplate without any problems.

And heck, they would do well even when using normal unarmed strikes, since they can grab brawling armor. Combined with weapon training/gloves of dueling, they can do fairly well for themselves, even when dealing with all that trouble with AoMF.

Scarab Sages

Imbicatus wrote:
lemeres wrote:


Anyway, with all this discussion, how do people feel about the sohei in all this? It is a monk archetype that gets a bit of weapon training and access to light armored flurry due to a FAQ. With furious focus to cover non-flurry attacks, and the false full BAB of flurry for full attacks, would they work well with power attack?

It would work, as The weapon Training/Gloves of Dueling let you add more accuracy, and Furious Focus makes sure the first hit will hit hard.

I also think the Sensei would be a good power attack user, as they have Inspire Courage to help accuracy, and being wisdom primary, they will likely have a higher attack stat than most monks due to being SAD vs MAD.

Sensei is still stuck in 3/4 BAB since they give up flurry though, and he doesn't have a lot of reason to invest in STR. I guess the possibility exists that there is a worthwhile way to do it, but it seems like a waste of the stat consolidation you get from the archetype to try and scrape for damage with PA. You're better off using that BA wisdom to squueze more mystical goodness out.

Weapon Adept could be a halfway decent option for PA, and maybe Monk of the Sacred Mountain who can pump STR and let DEX slip?


There are any monk weapon with range?

Scarab Sages

JuanAdriel wrote:
There are any monk weapon with range?

Mostly thrown. There's shuriken, lungchuan tamo, wushu darts, dan bong, rope dart, and the sibat, probably a few more.

Zen Archer can flurry with bows, and the Sohei can flurry with bows if he selects them for his weapon training.


ok, thanks.

Scarab Sages

JuanAdriel wrote:
There are any monk weapon with range?

Range or Reach?

If you want range, Shuriken, Wushu Darts, Lungchuan Tamo, Dan Bong, and the Rope Dart. Although the real answer for a ranged monk is a Zen Archer with a Bow.

If you want reach, there is the Kyoketsu shoge and the Kusarigama.


Imbicatus wrote:
JuanAdriel wrote:
There are any monk weapon with range?

Range or Reach?

If you want range, Shuriken, Wushu Darts, Lungchuan Tamo, Dan Bong, and the Rope Dart. Although the real answer for a ranged monk is a Zen Archer with a Bow.

If you want reach, there is the Kyoketsu shoge and the Kusarigama.

Or a level 6 sohei. Their choices in weapon training are wide enough that you can easily grab your weapon of choice (pole arms are usually the better choice though).

Grand Lodge

Dragon Style with Power Attack, works best with Feral Combat Training, as it turns a primary natural attack, into a primary natural attack, with x1.5 strength to damage, and thus, boosting the damage from Power Attack.

So, you have a Claw, that normally adds x1 Strength to damage, and would get a -1 to +2 from Power Attack, now gets a -1 to +3 from Power Attack.


blackbloodtroll wrote:

Dragon Style with Power Attack, works best with Feral Combat Training, as it turns a primary natural attack, into a primary natural attack, with x1.5 strength to damage, and thus, boosting the damage from Power Attack.

So, you have a Claw, that normally adds x1 Strength to damage, and would get a -1 to +2 from Power Attack, now gets a -1 to +3 from Power Attack.

Doesn't power attack work with unarmed strike? We are starting at level 8 so I have a 1d10 punch claws would be lower.

Scarab Sages

Gnomezrule wrote:
blackbloodtroll wrote:

Dragon Style with Power Attack, works best with Feral Combat Training, as it turns a primary natural attack, into a primary natural attack, with x1.5 strength to damage, and thus, boosting the damage from Power Attack.

So, you have a Claw, that normally adds x1 Strength to damage, and would get a -1 to +2 from Power Attack, now gets a -1 to +3 from Power Attack.

Doesn't power attack work with unarmed strike? We are starting at level 8 so I have a 1d10 punch claws would be lower.

Feral Combat Training would let you use your Monk Unarmed Strike Damage with your claws.


The 1.5x Str bonus to damage granted by Dragon Style would mean that Power Attack gives the +50% bonus damage, but only on your first unarmed strike. Subsequent unarmed strikes have the normal 1x Str bonus with an additional untyped bonus equal to half your Str modifier; it adds up to 1.5x Str but it doesn't count as 1.5x Str because it's actually 1x Str + 0.5x Str.

Another thing to consider is that a Monk's off-hand Unarmed Strikes are adjudicated as if they were main-hand, meaning they get 1x Str to damage and this also means they get full Power Attack bonus rather than half bonus (since they aren't considered off-hand attacks).


Kazaan wrote:
Another thing to consider is that a Monk's off-hand Unarmed Strikes are adjudicated as if they were main-hand, meaning they get 1x Str to damage and this also means they get full Power Attack bonus rather than half bonus (since they aren't considered off-hand attacks).

Ah, quite true. That is a nice 2x total for a full attack. And oddly, the 'no offhand' language is independently in both the flurry and unarmed strike abilities. But the latter is mostly only a concern for people dipping into monk (rangers being a rather nice choice for the main class).

Grand Lodge

Unarmed strikes aren't natural attacks so be careful with some of that logic. While they can be treated as such for certain spells they are also considered manufactured weapons and allow an iterative.


Monks are special; their Unarmed Strikes count as both. An Unarmed Fighter wouldn't get this benefit, even with Dragon Style; only a Monk.


Tiger Style + Power Attack is groovy for unarmed, however Two Handing a Temple Sword + Power Attack is more damage, which you can also use Tiger Style on so ends up being lots more damage.

I would always recommend Power Attack for a monk that retains Flurry of Blows, my spreadsheets show it is more damage at all levels in this case.

Honestly Power Attack is a feat tax for 90% of 3/4 BaB martials, and 100% of full-BaB martials.

Scarab Sages

Beopere wrote:

There are times when you are flanking, the enemy is prone, you're hasted, and you have heroism (or combinations thereof). Those are the times you wish you had flurry and power attack.

Also when flurrying you cannot 2h a temple sword. Well describe it how you wish, but it get's x1str and 1-2 PA

Flurry with a sansetsukon.

Scarab Sages

lemeres wrote:
Or a level 6 sohei. Their choices in weapon training are wide enough that you can easily grab your weapon of choice (pole arms are usually the better choice though).

And the Nodachi is in the pole arm weapon group.

Not a reach weapon, but darned effective.

Shadow Lodge

Tiger Style makes Power Attack incredible for a monk, since [in my experience], you either have an AC that is so low it may as well be 10, or is so high that taking a -5 to AC is really nothing. Without it, Power Attack is still a decent choice, but it would probably be much less Binary than with most martials.

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Advice / Power Attack Monk All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in Advice