FauxRizzle
|
Is there any reason that Corrosive Touch does d4 damage, while Shocking grasp does d6? Obviously the damage types are different, but is that reason enough to justify the lower damage on Corrosive Touch?
I suppose the only other difference is that Shocking Grasp isn't on the Summoner spell list, but I doubt that plays into it.
| Devilkiller |
Maybe there's a default assumption that fire and electricity are the "standard" energy damage types and will be more frequently resisted while acid and cold are special and should be reduced to d4s. I know that's how it seemed in older editions.
Beyond that, demons are immune to electricity and seem to be very common monsters. I've also noticed that Corrosive Touch is a Conjuration rather than Evocation spell, so maybe there could be some concerns about school balance. Evocation isn't always a highly lauded school to begin with...
| Lord Pendragon |
Take a look at Demon and Devil subtypes to start. Notice the immunities to Electricity and Fire.
There's a good reason for acid to do less damage than fire or electricity. Not so sure why Cold doesn't seem to get a similar penalty though...
| Vivianne Laflamme |
This thread seems relevant. It turns out acid resistance is more common than electricity resistance, but electricity immunity is more common than acid immunity.
| Robert A Matthews |
Take a look at Demon and Devil subtypes to start. Notice the immunities to Electricity and Fire.
There's a good reason for acid to do less damage than fire or electricity. Not so sure why Cold doesn't seem to get a similar penalty though...
They also have acid resistance.
| Lord Pendragon |
This thread seems relevant. It turns out acid resistance is more common than electricity resistance, but electricity immunity is more common than acid immunity.
Which makes the lower acid damage make sense. After all, at the levels where resistances/immunities start to show up, -5/10 damage isn't a big deal, but complete nullification is.
Still not sure how Cold gets a pass though...