| Grand Magus |
.
Like Tolstoy's unhappy families, on January 1, 2014, every business will
be made unhappy in a different way by the new law.
Or maybe not: For smaller companies, it could mean subsidies that make
offering health benefits more affordable. Companies with 50 or more
full-time employees, on the other hand, could face a range of penalties
for failing to offer affordable coverage.
From Inc.com:
Case Study #1 | Kavaliro Staffing: Bracing for Higher Health Care Bills
Case Study #2 | Oren Elliott Products: This Manufacturer Cries Foul
Case Study #3 | Maiden Media Group: Bring It On. We're Ready
Case Study #4 | Sun King Brewing: A Microbrewery Asks Premiums or Penalties?
... the clock is ticking.
.
CBDunkerson
|
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
My strategy is to celebrate the first step towards a sane health care policy in this country. True, we still pay far more for far worse medical care then any other 'modern' country in the world... but at least we're finally heading in the right direction.
| The 8th Dwarf |
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
My strategy will be to keep living in the UK and remember that when I visit the US I'll need good travel insurance.
While living in the UK, I won't worry about healthcare. At all.
Same here, our adequate but not perfect universal health care catches 90% of people in its safety net.
So unless I travel it wont worry about it.
What worries me more is the US jumping from Fiscal Cliff to Fiscal Cliff,it is not good for the worlds economy.
| A highly regarded expert |
Thus far the changes mean I'll be able to get health insurance without needing to break contract by conveniently forgetting to mention certain preexisting conditions.
But.., that's socialism!
How dare you deny healthcare corporations the right to maximize profits by making a standardized healthcare law?
You could hurt profits! Can we do that in this economy?
How can the public sector dole out healthcare better than for-profit insurers?