| jerrys |
So in 3rd edition I thought that all of the different sorts of precision damage (weapon specialization damage bonus, favored enemy damage bonus, sneak attack damage, etc) were limited to 30 feet when you were using a ranged weapon.
It seems like those restrictions were lifted on everything except sneak attack in pathfinder. Is that right? If so it sort of opens up some (unfair?) possibilities for "snipers" with composite longbows or maybe crossbows (for fighters and rangers, if not rogues).
Anyway, does anybody know the rationale for that change? (Or maybe I am just wrong, I don't know.)
| Funky Badger |
To be honest, there's a great deal less precision damage in Pathfinder than 3rd. For example, Favored Enemy is not precision damage anymore.
In fact, though I'm sure there's more I'm just not thinking of, Sneak Attack is the only source of precision damage I can come up with off the top of my head.
Duelist's Precise Strike is precision damage as well, but I can't think of any more...
Morgen
|
Hold on here. It's Wizards of the Coast that changed those rules years ago in their conversion from 3.0 to 3.5 D&D. Paizo really didn't do anything to change that stuff from what it was since then.
So Pathfinder didn't make any chance to any of those 30' ranged attack rules. They'd been gone for years.
| Funky Badger |
Actually, as bizarre as this is, I don't believe the Duelist's Precise Strike is precision damage.
Nope, you're right. It's stopepd by anything that's immune to crits (or fortification etc.) and relies on a discernable anatomy, but isn't precision
Which is good, because it gets doubled-up of criticals...