I've heard tales of TWF Cavaliers / Samurai...


Advice

51 to 74 of 74 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Lantern Lodge

hustonj wrote:


Playing a table-top RPG is NOT about the numbers. It is about social interaction and entertainment.

Of course it is. But the OP is asking if a TWF Cavalier/Samurai is more optimal than a 2HF Cavalier/Samurai. This is an optimization question. I am not saying "Don't play the PC". I am saying it is not optimal and using math to prove my points.


He asked for verification that the numbers can get nasty, for build recommendations, and for any archetypes that would be beneficial as part of such builds.

Before I tried to establish open communication by discussing TWW numbers, you were becoming directive and insulting to people who were providing recommendations that you find disagreeable.

This thread is about getting the OP a variety of recommendations that he can pick form, not about establishing that your perspective is the only truly optimized build.

I joined not to try to provide build specific advice (I really dislike the Cavalier class, personally), but to get you to stop suggesting that other people's comments and advice were a waste of bandwidth. That's not your call and even runs counter to the point of the thread.

Lantern Lodge

hustonj wrote:

Before I tried to establish open communication by discussing TWW numbers, you were becoming directive and insulting to people who were providing recommendations that you find disagreeable.

From the OP: "... I've heard the damage output can be pretty insane with Challenge up, and with the full BAB soaking up the TWF penalties.

How accurate is this, and what does a good build for it look like? What Order is best?"

I'm saying it's not accurate and backing up my statement with concrete math not arbitrary suggestions. I don't know how you feel this as insulting. Furthermore, your TWW has nothing to do with the OP it is a totally different class. The OP wants cavalier/samurai archetypes. Hence why I have said nothing towards Pharmalades suggestion since it is a suggested archetype not a suggested archetype to counter my 2HF like Avatarded's Goblin TWF.

hustonj wrote:
The people who demand that Str is mandatory for a combat build always use Str-based builds and Str-based tactics to prove their point. Ignoring Dex-based builds and Dex-based tactics doesn't make being Dex-based bad, it just means you won't let go of your existing paradigm.

You're implying that I wont let go of an existing paradigm when that's not the case.


kaisc006 wrote:


The adopted trait doesn't give you bite. This is a common misperception. Adopted allows you access to race traits not racial traits. Race traits are found HERE while racial traits are those within the race's description (such as the half-orc's toothy).

But if you're a half-orc, absolutely you should gain a bite.

In fact there is a racial trait AND a race trait that gives a bite attack. onde of those you can take via adopted.

Lantern Lodge

Umbranus wrote:
In fact there is a racial trait AND a race trait that gives a bite attack. onde of those you can take via adopted.

Please provide a link or the name of this race trait because that's pretty awesome if you're right.


If you can get it you can use the Razortusk Feat for a Bite. Or play a Tengu.

Also there is the Tusked Trait from Orcs of Golarion.

Lantern Lodge

Azaelas Fayth wrote:

If you can get it you can use the Razortusk Feat for a Bite. Or play a Tengu.

Also there is the Tusked Trait from Orcs of Golarion.

I understand this but none of these options are available via the Adopted trait because they are either racial feats or racial traits, not race traits. Umbranus believes there is a race trait that grants a bite attack.


Yea, half-orcs get three choices for gaining a bite.

Toothy - Alternative Racial Trait (instead of Orc Ferocity)
Tusked - Race Trait
Razortusk - Feat

Chomp chomp.


Tusked: Huge, sharp tusks bulge from your mouth,
and you receive a bite attack (1d4 damage for Medium
characters). If used as part of a full attack action, the bite
attack is made at your full base attack bonus –5.

Source: Orcs of Golarion page. 23.

Sczarni

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I'm most disappointed in the fact that nobody has pointed out that the Lance is a one-handed weapon when you're on horseback, and thus you could theoretically TWF with a pair of lances at reach, while your horse threatens adjacent.

And if you're Medium, then your horse takes up a 10x10 square (and so do you while riding it) and you'd threaten a reach radius AROUND that 10x10 square. It's like having built-in Enlarge Person up all the time-- and with all that Dex and such a wide threatened area, Combat Reflexes starts to look hilarious.

Lantern Lodge

The Adopted trait only allowing race traits is clarified HERE by the Editor in Chief.

If you read the Adopted trait description you will notice it specifically says "Race Traits" which are listed HERE.

Race traits are not to be confused with racial traits. Looking at the Half-Orc Race you'll notice Toothy is described as a racial trait and unavailable for the Adopted trait. Hence why any race cannot take Adopted (human) and gain a bonus feat, because the bonus feat is a human racial trait.


Tusked is a Race Trait from Pathfinder Companion: Orcs of Golarion.

Lantern Lodge

Azaelas Fayth wrote:

Tusked: Huge, sharp tusks bulge from your mouth,

and you receive a bite attack (1d4 damage for Medium
characters). If used as part of a full attack action, the bite
attack is made at your full base attack bonus –5.

Source: Orcs of Golarion page. 23.

It also states under Race Traits "Only orcs and half-orcs may select one of these traits".

Scarab Sages

kaisc006 wrote:
Azaelas Fayth wrote:

Tusked: Huge, sharp tusks bulge from your mouth,

and you receive a bite attack (1d4 damage for Medium
characters). If used as part of a full attack action, the bite
attack is made at your full base attack bonus –5.

Source: Orcs of Golarion page. 23.

It also states under Race Traits "Only orcs and half-orcs may select one of these traits".

Which is why he's taking Adopted..... Which does work, even if it doesn't make any sense...

Scarab Sages

A human could also take the Racial Heritage feat enabling them to take either the Tusked trait or the Razortusk feat.


Ssalarn wrote:
kaisc006 wrote:
Azaelas Fayth wrote:

Tusked: Huge, sharp tusks bulge from your mouth,

and you receive a bite attack (1d4 damage for Medium
characters). If used as part of a full attack action, the bite
attack is made at your full base attack bonus –5.

Source: Orcs of Golarion page. 23.

It also states under Race Traits "Only orcs and half-orcs may select one of these traits".
Which is why he's taking Adopted..... Which does work, even if it doesn't make any sense...

I would make it to where they trained to strengthen their jaw and teeth to be able to bite with enough force.


i thought toothy was an alternate racial feature, tusked was a racial trait.

we had a lot of confusion about the terminology back when duskblade and that unicorn-avatar person were arguing about something or other.

Lantern Lodge

AndIMustMask wrote:
i thought toothy was an alternate racial feature, tusked was a racial trait.

Hmm I'm wrong. Check out This Thread or search there are many others covering the same thing. RAI it's pretty clear the devs didn't want this to work with Adopted. However RAW it's legal. Should be faqed though because at a PFS event I might have to cover my nose ;)

Scarab Sages

Toothy is an "Alternate Racial Trait" whereas Tusked is a "Race Trait" drawn from the list of Traits. Unfortunately this is one of those areas where remarkably similar terminology refers to two completely separate things. "Alternate Racial Traits" are taken in place of a races standard ability, like the way Toothy replaces Ferocity (I think that's the one it subs out...). Race Traits are one of the sub-categories of traits, which a normal character gets 2 of and neither of which can come from the same category (race, religion, social, etc.)


I could see it as a Human with Orcish Ancestry who has Vestigial Tusks just strong enough.

Scarab Sages

Azaelas Fayth wrote:
I could see it as a Human with Orcish Ancestry who has Vestigial Tusks just strong enough.

That would fall more under the line of the Racial Heritage feat than the Adopted trait though... Unless you were adopted by your great-uncle.


Grandparents/Great-Grandparents tribe.

Scarab Sages

Azaelas Fayth wrote:
Grandparents/Great-Grandparents tribe.

Ah, fair enough then.


Or in the case of one of my characters she is descended from a Half-Orc Cavalier who united tribes of all the races to form a new nation.

51 to 74 of 74 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Advice / I've heard tales of TWF Cavaliers / Samurai... All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in Advice