
Pharmalade |

I've seen you around a lot. We've commented on the same thread before. Should I change it?
Further question: While inside a foe's square, if that foe's square could be flanking another foe with another PC, does it flank?
Example: I stunning fist mister evil magus and enter his square. Next to mister evil magus is miss scary fighter. My buddy the ranger is on the other side of miss scary fighter. Is the fighter flanked?
And further, this is just me parsing the sentence too fine, but does the dodge bonus to AC only apply to the foe who's square you occupy or is it a blanket bonus and you only get plus for on attack rolls against your new close friend?

![]() |

Example: I stunning fist mister evil magus and enter his square. Next to mister evil magus is miss scary fighter. My buddy the ranger is on the other side of miss scary fighter. Is the fighter flanked?
You still threaten miss scary fighter and you and the ranger are on opposite squares, so yes.
And further, this is just me parsing the sentence too fine, but does the dodge bonus to AC only apply to the foe who's square you occupy or is it a blanket bonus and you only get plus for on attack rolls against your new close friend?
I think this is too-fine parsing and both benefits apply only against the opponent whose square you share. I'm not 100% sure, though.

mplindustries |

I've seen you around a lot. We've commented on the same thread before. Should I change it?
No, don't be silly--there's a limited number of avatars, I just thought nobody else liked this one. Crap, look at how many crows, rats holding books, and that atog-looking monster thing there are. You're supposed to repeat avatars.
Further question: While inside a foe's square, if that foe's square could be flanking another foe with another PC, does it flank?
Yes.
And further, this is just me parsing the sentence too fine, but does the dodge bonus to AC only apply to the foe who's square you occupy or is it a blanket bonus and you only get plus for on attack rolls against your new close friend?
I'm pretty sure you get +4 to AC in general, and +4 to attacks specifically against that foe.
The evidence is both the sentence structure itself and the fact that an AC bonus "against that opponent" doesn't really make much sense in game terms.