Magus is the first thing that came to mind, or an eldritch knight. Another option would be an alchemist, they can do well in melee and are an int based caster (though not technically a caster).
EDIT: Some of your stats don't add up, for example "wisdom (2,5,3,3,3) = 11" when that adds up to 16, not 11.
|
EDIT: Some of your stats don't add up, for example "wisdom (2,5,3,3,3) = 11" when that adds up to 16, not 11.
I think in the system he's using you take the highest three dice, so the 11 comes from 5 + 3 + 3.
EDIT: Aaaaaand ninja'd.
Oh well. To the point of the thread: you can also possibly consider a lore warden fighter - that extra Int will not go to waste there.
Hi thanks for a quick anwser. My stats should ad up. I can roll more than 3d6 but i can still only use the 3 highest. As a normal rolled ability score.Magus is the first thing that came to mind, or an eldritch knight. Another option would be an alchemist, they can do well in melee and are an int based caster (though not technically a caster).
EDIT: Some of your stats don't add up, for example "wisdom (2,5,3,3,3) = 11" when that adds up to 16, not 11.
Ah, that makes sense then, just didn't know how you rolled for stats, for some you rolled 3d6 and others were 5d6.
Another suggestion would be a melee based sorcerer/dragon disciple. But the only way to make it work with your stats would be to take the crossblooded archetype then take the sage and draconic bloodlines.
Or you could just go straight witch, wizard or sage sorcerer and ignore your strength if you want.
Or you could just go straight witch, wizard or sage sorcerer and ignore your strength if you want.True. You could also go straight fighter, barbarian, or cavalier and ignore your int.
That as well, you could go with anything that uses str or int as a main stat. You could also make a melee ranger and either hope to get a headband of wisdom or put your 4th or 8th lv bonus into wis to allow you to cast 2nd lv spells. It may not be the most efficient route but it should do alright.
Cool.
I think i will try and look more into at the rogue and alchemist.
As i said i am new to this game. So dont know all the sub clases and what could work. Pathfinder seems a bit harder to generate a char than d&d E4.
I am greatfull for ur help so far.
We start at lvl 7. So i have a lot to figur out.
The beastmorph and vivisectionist archetypes (for alchemist) are fairly popular, and you would be a monster in melee, quite literally in fact lol. Also, a vivisectionist's sneak attack does stack with a rogues (or any other class that grants sneak attack), unless it specifically says it doesn't.
Strength-based rogues are fun. Nothing says "sneak attack" like a heavy mace to the face. My own preference along those lines is for a half-orc - their falchion proficiency can get uuuuuuugly. (In the best possible sense.)
I've dealt sneak attack with a great sword before. It was rather amusing to say the least.
Why change what you wanted to be? Elven ranger with a composite longbow and precise shot/focused shot feats (add INT to ranged damage). Carry an elven curve blade and be a switch hitter with lots of skill points.
I didnt look into those meele classes cause of my lack of con and dex. But i am starting to see that it could work.
Yea, I like to have a good con (14) on my characters. You may want to look into taking toughness or getting a belt of con to make up for your lower hp.
|
Low dex can be easily compensated for with good armor, and your con really doesn't need to be as high as your strength.
And with 15 Int, you could easily take Improved Trip or Improved Disarm, which would make it harder for opponents to hit you.
If you're new to Pathfinder, I doubly suggest the rogue since it's less complicated than an alchemist. But you'll know when from reading them which one appeals to you more.
Low dex can be easily compensated for with good armor, and your con really doesn't need to be as high as your strength.
And with 15 Int, you could easily take Improved Trip or Improved Disarm, which would make it harder for opponents to hit you.
If you're new to Pathfinder, I doubly suggest the rogue since it's less complicated than an alchemist. But you'll know when from reading them which one appeals to you more.
I agree with this, I enjoy the alchemist, but it is more complicated than a rogue.
+1, Keen for sure