| Vasantasena |
I want to put toguether several qualties of magical items in order to create a very special one tailor made for my character using these:
Robe of the Runes
Ring of Evasion
Robe of the Archmage
Essentially I want to use the Robe of the Runes (with a stronger ability), add the Ring of Evasion ability and use the aligment restriction of the robe of the archmage: Thus equaling to this:
+4 a Con de RotR: 16000
Spell Recal 4 levels of spells/+2: 28000
But to input a 6 level of spells/+3 to Attack and DC for 1 round:
Spell Recall 6 levels of spells/+3: 28,000 * 1.5 = 42000
Adding the Ring of Evasion:
+25000 del Ring of Evasion
And restricting the aligment to Lawful Good would be a 30% discount.
Totaling: 16000 (+4 Con) + 42000 (Spell Recall 6/+3) + 25000 (Evasion) = 83000
With a 30% discount for restricting aligment = 58,100
Thus I present to you:
Robe of the Noble Warrior Mage
Aura strong transmutation; CL 14th
Slot body; Price 58,100 gp
DESCRIPTION
This robe of white silk and emblazoned with dozens of spindly golden Thassilonian runes and arcane etchings was created by a renowned hero of Sandpoint with a flair for crafting unique wondrous items. During her attonement for her past sins and on the path of stopping the Runelord Karzoug she wanted to forge a powerful robe that would accentuate her arcane warrior heritage and yield proper honor to the path of redemption being walked, thus the Robes of the Noble Warrior Mage were born. Favored by powerful Magi and Eldrith Knights, this robe can provides benefits to those who wish to master spell and sword. While worn, it grants a +4 enhancement bonus to Constitution and allows the wearer to recall, as a free action, up to six levels of spells per day that he had prepared and then cast. Each time a spell is recalled and prepared again in this manner, the sudden rush of magical energy infuses the wearer with power for one round after recalling a spell, the wearer’s spell save DCs and attack rolls for spells gain a +3 enhancement bonus.
While worn the robe grants the wearer the ability to avoid damage as if she had evasion. Whenever she makes a Reflex saving throw to determine whether she takes half damage, a successful save results in no damage.
The Robe of the Noble Warrior Mage has the same restrictions to aligment as the Robe of the Archmage (good).
CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS
Craft Wondrous Item, bear's endurance, jump, limited wish, creator must be of the same aligment; Cost 29,050g
_______________
Please let me know what you think!
| Maezer |
You are not adding in the 1.5 multiplier for each additional ability you add to the robe. Adding the ring of evasion ability to a more expensive item adds 25,000*1.5 to the more expensive items price.
And when scaling an ability it scales exponentially. At the very least going from the 4 spell levels/+2 to the 6/+3 should be a 3^2/2^2 cost multiplier following the same lines as any other scaling bonus.
And I'd never let a player crafting an item for the party apply the restrictive alignment discount. Otherwise you might as well discount every single item in the game by 30%. Honestly to a player buying an item that does X, and an item that does X only for them is nearly nothing.
Swapping Con for Int is no price difference. Though to keep everything even within the Robe of Runes I'd just bump the stat increase by 3/2 as well.
Thusly I would price your item at the base item (Robe of Runes)*9/4+(Ring of Evasion)*1.5 = At 136.5. Leaving the stat bonus at +4 would be a 20k discount. So 116.5k. If you really want a 30% discount then its 81.5k.
| Vasantasena |
You are not adding in the 1.5 multiplier for each additional ability you add to the robe. Adding the ring of evasion ability to a more expensive item adds 25,000*1.5 to the more expensive items price.
And when scaling an ability it scales exponentially. At the very least going from the 4 spell levels/+2 to the 6/+3 should be a 3^2/2^2 cost multiplier following the same lines as any other scaling bonus.
And I'd never let a player crafting an item for the party apply the restrictive alignment discount. Otherwise you might as well discount every single item in the game by 30%. Honestly to a player buying an item that does X, and an item that does X only for them is nearly nothing.
Swapping Con for Int is no price difference. Though to keep everything even within the Robe of Runes I'd just bump the stat increase by 3/2 as well.
Thusly I would price your item at the base item (Robe of Runes)*9/4+(Ring of Evasion)*1.5 = At 136.5. Leaving the stat bonus at +4 would be a 20k discount. So 116.5k. If you really want a 30% discount then its 81.5k.
Oh the scaling cost of the spell recalling ability I get it, but I dont think the 25,000*1.5 would not apply because that is for items that exist already not one created from scratch.
| master arminas |
. . . but I don't think the 25,000*1.5 would not apply because that is for items taht exist already not one created from scratch.
Ah, no. You think wrong. Adding any additional property to a magic item, whether existing or made from scratch incurs the 1.5 times multiplier. Maezer is correct, and the price would be 136,500 gp, not 58,100 gp.
Master Arminas
| Weables |
Also, the 30% discount for alignment restriction is completely up to your DM. I don't allow it in my games, simply because it tends to be a cheesy way to reduce cost with no penalty.
"But Bob, I get a 90% discount on this magic item if it can only be worn on days ending in Y by elves named Darren who also have 5 classes in magus and speak with a lisp!"
ya know? if you're an elf magus with a lisp named Darren, its really no major hardship.
| SeaBiscuit01 |
Also, the 30% discount for alignment restriction is completely up to your DM. I don't allow it in my games, simply because it tends to be a cheesy way to reduce cost with no penalty.
"But Bob, I get a 90% discount on this magic item if it can only be worn on days ending in Y by elves named Darren who also have 5 classes in magus and speak with a lisp!"
ya know? if you're an elf magus with a lisp named Darren, its really no major hardship.
Damn I didnt knew that. Well thats over my budget thanks for the feedback! No wonder it looked kinda cheap. Thanks!