What was the antagonize fix?

[cfalcon]

I'm just wondering if they fixed the mind control portion of this. I see that there's a DC adjustment (went up by a few points, depending on the target's wisdom modifier, but still trivial). Was there anything else? Does it still make a gunslinger, wizard, archer, or cleric run for two rounds with no save?

[ProfPotts]

As far as I'm aware, there hasn't been one yet - just the obvious DC bit, and a statement along the lines of 'we may have to go away and think about this for a bit...'.

[kingpin]

there is an update in the faq http://paizo.com/pathfinderRPG/v5748btpy8k8r/faq#v5748eaic9o7i

[cfalcon]

Thank you, but I that looks like the small up to the DC (taking away wisdom bonus and adding 10 instead). Everyone sort of assumed that it was a misprint to begin with, given that the DC was set differently than everything else (and ludicrously low). It's still an auto-success, but it prevents the "succeed on a 1 at 10th level to taunt anyone at level 20" thing.

I was more wondering if they had addressed the forced-melee issue, as well as the two-rounds-denied issue, and it appears that they have not.

[leo1925]

cfalcon wrote:

I was more wondering if they had addressed the forced-melee issue, as well as the two-rounds-denied issue, and it appears that they have not.

Why don't you like the fact that you can say to a king something about his mother and he must to attack you with his scepter? no he can't order his guards to do it, no he can't order his wizard to vaporize you, he must attack you in melee[/snark]

No there hasn't been an update yet.