| Chaostream |
Related to my other question, Improved grapple has Improved Unarmed Strike as a prerequisite now. If I'm a dire tiger (that already has the special ability grab with my claws) and I want to take Improved Grapple, do I still have to take Improved Unarmed Strike? It would seem that proficiency with natural weapons would kind of cover that one.
Name Violation
|
Chaostream wrote:
Related to my other question, Improved grapple has Improved Unarmed Strike as a prerequisite now. If I'm a dire tiger (that already has the special ability grab with my claws) and I want to take Improved Grapple, do I still have to take Improved Unarmed Strike? It would seem that proficiency with natural weapons would kind of cover that one.
nope. it need imp unarmed strike. thems the breaks
Howie23
|
Chaostream wrote:
Related to my other question, Improved grapple has Improved Unarmed Strike as a prerequisite now. If I'm a dire tiger (that already has the special ability grab with my claws) and I want to take Improved Grapple, do I still have to take Improved Unarmed Strike? It would seem that proficiency with natural weapons would kind of cover that one.
There are a number of creatures that have Improved Grapple as a bonus feat. RAW is that IUS is needed as the prereq otherwise. If you don't like that in your campaign, modify the feat or add a feat with different prereqs. Maybe something like Improved Grab...requires critter to have Grab ability...