
Gerrinson |
I'd say no, though it could be considered a provocative observation, but not an outright attack. In many cases I've said similar simply because it was the fact of the situation.
On the other hand, I'm a rude git (apparently) who routinely embarrases my g/f in public by telling people off.
Like the guy in his Jag that used the handicapped space w/ no placard/plate and jogged into the grocery store, for example.

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

To take a more serious angle on this. Yes, and for several possible reasons.
1) As stated before, saying "I pity your X" rarely means there is actual pity behind the statement. Sort of along the lines of being in NC and hearing someone say "bless her/his heart" ...
2) Even if there is actual pity involved, some folks take offense at being shown pity in general.
3) Depending on what is being discussed, accusing someone of ignorance when the discussion is a debate over differing opinions 'ignorance' is a definitely charged term. There is a difference between actual ignorance (not knowing the facts regarding a topic) and charged ignorance (because you don't agree with the other person's point of view).
And, on the not so serious front,
4) If ignorance is bliss and you pity their ignorance then you are pitying someone for their bliss. How ignorant! ;)

![]() |

Compare:
I pity your ignorance.
vs.
I think you are ignorant on this topic.
Sadly, they'll get you the same response.
I was in another thread earlier today, where people were saying the Pathfinder version of a feat was total crap despite having not used it. Having used it to decent effect myself, I said (intending to point out the difference between theory and experience) that the view was "ignorant".
Took a while for things to calm back down. O_o

![]() |

You only had to wait 4 minutes.
You don't count! Jeez, think you're special or something?

Sieglord |
Can you provide incontrovertible proof of said ignorance? If so, then the answer is, "Absolutely not." The truth is never (under absolutely any circumstances whatsoever) an insult or personal attack. If the ignorant person is too prideful or too stupid to admit they are wrong, that is THEIR problem, not yours, and there is no fault in pointing that out.
Just make sure you come correct (i.e., have your facts straight) if you plan to take the discussion in that direction...

![]() |

Can you provide incontrovertible proof of said ignorance? If so, then the answer is, "Absolutely not." The truth is never (under absolutely any circumstances whatsoever) an insult or personal attack. If the ignorant person is too prideful or too stupid to admit they are wrong, that is THEIR problem, not yours, and there is no fault in pointing that out.
Just make sure you come correct (i.e., have your facts straight) if you plan to take the discussion in that direction...
So... don't be ignorant if you're going to accuse someone of ignorance.
Got it!

![]() |
3 people marked this as a favorite. |

Studpuffin wrote:Also, how'd this end up in website feedback?!I think at one point we thought this might turn into a serious discussion of etiquette, respect and perhaps tone, language and other larger things. I think we guessed wrong.
moves thread back to off-topic. safe. safe, now.
You did see that Studpuffin started the thread, right?

![]() |

Studpuffin wrote:Also, how'd this end up in website feedback?!I think at one point we thought this might turn into a serious discussion of etiquette, respect and perhaps tone, language and other larger things. I think we guessed wrong.
moves thread back to off-topic. safe. safe, now.
I'll say! :P

![]() |

Gary Teter wrote:You did see that Studpuffin started the thread, right?Studpuffin wrote:Also, how'd this end up in website feedback?!I think at one point we thought this might turn into a serious discussion of etiquette, respect and perhaps tone, language and other larger things. I think we guessed wrong.
moves thread back to off-topic. safe. safe, now.
QFT!

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Can you provide incontrovertible proof of said ignorance? If so, then the answer is, "Absolutely not." The truth is never (under absolutely any circumstances whatsoever) an insult or personal attack. If the ignorant person is too prideful or too stupid to admit they are wrong, that is THEIR problem, not yours, and there is no fault in pointing that out.
Just make sure you come correct (i.e., have your facts straight) if you plan to take the discussion in that direction...
This is utter nonsense.
If somebody is overweight and you choose to ridicule them for it, it is insulting even though it is true.
If you mock someone's disability, it is insulting.
It is entirely possible to state the truth and make a personal attack at the same time. Being courteous in one's personal interactions can go a long way.