Monk unarmed strike as 2 handed weapon adding the 1.1 / 2 str damage

[Lobolusk]

I have searched but cant find the answer, but if i axe handle an enemy with both of my hands in a classic captian kirk move. can i add my 1.1/2 strength dmage to my unarmed strike? if i hit with both hands at a the same time? any rules say no or yah? to this? because my whole body is a weapon cant I mule kick a orc in the chest? (hitting in the sitting position while jumping). and that is a 2 handed strike , well really a 2 footed strike?

any body?

[Grick]

Lobolusk wrote:

I have searched but cant find the answer, but if i axe handle an enemy with both of my hands in a classic captian kirk move. can i add my 1.1/2 strength dmage to my unarmed strike? if i hit with both hands at a the same time? any rules say no or yah? to this? because my whole body is a weapon cant I mule kick a orc in the chest? (hitting in the sitting position while jumping). and that is a 2 handed strike , well really a 2 footed strike?

any body?

Light, One-Handed, and Two-Handed Melee Weapons:

"An unarmed strike is always considered a light weapon."

"Using two hands to wield a light weapon gives no advantage on damage; the Strength bonus applies as though the weapon were held in the wielder's primary hand only."

[Lobolusk]

thanks

[Slayer Dragonwing]

There was a feat in 3.5 that allowed you to do this, but I think you had to make only one attack in that turn. I don't remember the name of it.

[Christopher Van Horn]

Slayer Dragonwing wrote:

There was a feat in 3.5 that allowed you to do this, but I think you had to make only one attack in that turn. I don't remember the name of it.

Hammer Blow (or something of a very similar name that escapes me at the moment, its been a long time since I looked it up) from Races of Faerun did it, but it was a dwarf only feat...

[thepuregamer]

in 3.5 there was a monk variant that had a single heavy unarmed strike attack. It was in the players handbook 2.