smurf!smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!
smurf!smurf!
I was only made for virtual combat!
smurfsmurfsmurf
smurfsmurfsmurf
smurfsmurfsmurfsmurfsmurfsmurf
smurfsmurfsmurf
smurfsmurfsmurfsmurfsmurfsmurf
smurfsmurfsmurf
huzzah!
It's not an edition war until somebody is...um...
SMURF!!!
Job, task, undertaking, mission, whatever adds bouyancy to your sea-going vessel.My job here is done.You had a job here?!?!?
Throwing people off?
Sneaking up on them and heaving them over by their trousers whilst they're taking a whiz is the best.
|
We can accommodate that. Be it buccaneer style walking of the plank, 300 style Spartan kick, Sabin Figaro style Suplex A Train, or Mr T style throwin' a foo, the choices are varied for all of our customers tastes.
Very interested in purchasing a Mr. T-styled service, but do you support a ZA WARUDO option?
Frankly, I'm sorely disappointed by the lack of Rules 34 and 63.
Mind, I was pleased that Pathfinder Classic retained the application of Rule 63 to the Wizard. Who'd have thought the elder gent would end up so...'perky'?
It's all fun and games until someone makes a new edition.
I find the existence of this thread condescending to the companies who have given us the previous editions. If you don't like the previous editions, you are a /&%/&% &%(/&% %&/&% &/zi. Oh, and if you denigrate the current edition, you are a complete (&/% %&/&& %%%% &&%%!
Frankly, I'm sorely disappointed by the lack of Rules 34 and 63.
Mind, I was pleased that Pathfinder Classic retained the application of Rule 63 to the Wizard. Who'd have thought the elder gent would end up so...'perky'?
I'm well versed in #34, but #63 .... ?
SAUCE!
I'm well versed in #34, but #63 .... ?Frankly, I'm sorely disappointed by the lack of Rules 34 and 63.
Mind, I was pleased that Pathfinder Classic retained the application of Rule 63 to the Wizard. Who'd have thought the elder gent would end up so...'perky'?
34 is porn.
63 is female version of male character, often extrapolated to...75 is gender-swap for redundancy and emphasis.
|
Rules of Acquisition!
That's not a very good website -- I'm not a Star Trek expert (honest, I'm not) but I know of one that's not on the list:
.
It's in the same episode (Voyager) that the list's #22 is in.
|
Rules of Acquisition!That's not a very good website -- I'm not a Star Trek expert (honest, I'm not) but I know of one that's not on the list:
.
It's in the same episode (Voyager) that the list's #22 is in.
F&$&, like I know a fictional capitalist system like the back of my hand. Jeez, the nerve of some people.
Reg: All right, but apart from the skill system, simplified armour class, streamlined classes, greater balance, cool game worlds, more variety, more races, the creating a community and gave us a good time, what has the previous edition ever done for us?
Attendee: Brought Fun and Joy?
Reg: Oh, Fun and Joy - shut up!
Reg: There is not one of us who would not gladly suffer death to rid this country of the previous edition once and for all.
Dissenter: Uh, well, one.
Reg: Oh, yeah, yeah, there's one. But otherwise, we're solid.
This is fantastic! Kudos to you for a re-write of a classic part of a classic film. Very funny. :)
