| Hidious Phidias |
There is nothing in the rules stating that you cannot, to my knowledge.
Now stating that, since the person grappling you cannot make an AoO against you for casting... I'm not sure which role would need to be done first if there is someone within reach to do an AoO against you while Grappled.
Only the creature that is being grappled losses the ability to make AoO, the person who controls the grapple still can.
| Rathendar |
Pathos wrote:Only the creature that is being grappled losses the ability to make AoO, the person who controls the grapple still can.There is nothing in the rules stating that you cannot, to my knowledge.
Now stating that, since the person grappling you cannot make an AoO against you for casting... I'm not sure which role would need to be done first if there is someone within reach to do an AoO against you while Grappled.
I believe both creatures in a grapple gain the grappled condition, which includes the loss of threatened area.
edit: just double-checked, and my statement is true by RAW.
| Pathos |
"If successful, both you and the target gain the grappled condition."Hidious Phidias wrote:Pathos wrote:Only the creature that is being grappled losses the ability to make AoO, the person who controls the grapple still can.There is nothing in the rules stating that you cannot, to my knowledge.
Now stating that, since the person grappling you cannot make an AoO against you for casting... I'm not sure which role would need to be done first if there is someone within reach to do an AoO against you while Grappled.
I believe both creatures in a grapple gain the grappled condition, which includes the loss of threatened area.
edit: just double-checked, and my statement is true by RAW.