Estragon al'Godot
|
So spellstrike looks all awesome - I can use my weapon to deliver the touch spells from the magus spell list? Sweet! Let's go look at the spell list! So, we have shocking grasp and... Hey, wait, where's the rest of the touch spells?
I know! I will whack my enemy and I shall cast Bull's Strength upon him. Wait, that's a terrible idea. Enlarge Person? No. Stoneskin? Not likely.
So, I guess most of the spells with a range of touch are Necromancy, and none of these seem to have made the list. How about Touch of Idiocy or Touch of Gracelessness? Touch of anything?
| Enevhar Aldarion |
So spellstrike looks all awesome - I can use my weapon to deliver the touch spells from the magus spell list? Sweet! Let's go look at the spell list! So, we have shocking grasp and... Hey, wait, where's the rest of the touch spells?
I know! I will whack my enemy and I shall cast Bull's Strength upon him. Wait, that's a terrible idea. Enlarge Person? No. Stoneskin? Not likely.
So, I guess most of the spells with a range of touch are Necromancy, and none of these seem to have made the list. How about Touch of Idiocy or Touch of Gracelessness? Touch of anything?
Jason has stated in another thread that is in the currently well-concealed playtest forum, that most of the touch attack spells will be new spells for UM, but are not ready to be revealed yet.
| Mythrandyr |
I don't know how everyone feels about the ultimate magic playtest but...
I think that the Magus class is amazing but for one huge flaw.
The spell list does not include enough touch-spells to truly capitalize on the class features that combine melee and spells into a two-weapon fighting form...
Anyone else find this disappointing?