Cheliax - Companion vs. Campaign Setting question


Lost Omens Campaign Setting General Discussion

Liberty's Edge

I recently received my Cheliax Empire of Devils Companion an I really like it. Well done!

I did notice one thing that might be a discrepancy.

In the Cheliax entry of the Campaign Setting book, under Notable Noble Houses, it mentions House Narikopolus as being famed for their archers.

In the Cheliax companion, in the Righteous North section (page 10) there is mention of "House Napiciza, famed archers of Cheliax"

Now, it certainly is possible that there are two Houses famous for their archers, but it seems unlikely. Is this a small breach in continuity, an editorial change, or are there in fact two house equally famed for their archers?

I ask specifically because I wanted to use this hook a little in the background of the ranger I am creating to take through the COT adventur path.

Thanks!!!

Dark Archive

It is very likly a misprint. However, the way I handled it in my own game is that House Napiciza is just the name for the northern branch of the much larger House Narikopolus.

Silver Crusade

David Fryer wrote:
It is very likly a misprint.

Still, if it is a misprint, I wonder why the shift from Greek- to Italian-esque naming?


Cheliax is so awesome! - How awesome is Cheliax? - Cheliax is so awesome, they have TWO famed archer families. Narikopolus is like the urban version.

Scarab Sages

Cheliax is only "awesome" if you totally ignore the rest of the world and don't know that Osirian did it all on their own withouth the help of devils, demons, Aztlanti, and aboleths...

Just sayin'.

Liberty's Edge

Marc Radle 81 wrote:

I recently received my Cheliax Empire of Devils Companion an I really like it. Well done!

I did notice one thing that might be a discrepancy.

In the Cheliax entry of the Campaign Setting book, under Notable Noble Houses, it mentions House Narikopolus as being famed for their archers.

In the Cheliax companion, in the Righteous North section (page 10) there is mention of "House Napiciza, famed archers of Cheliax"

Now, it certainly is possible that there are two Houses famous for their archers, but it seems unlikely. Is this a small breach in continuity, an editorial change, or are there in fact two house equally famed for their archers?

I ask specifically because I wanted to use this hook a little in the background of the ranger I am creating to take through the COT adventur path.

Thanks!!!

Narikopolus is the Absalom/Pathfinder name. Napiciza is the Chelish name. Same house, different pronunciations to keep the meaning. Simple, really.


uriel222 wrote:
David Fryer wrote:
It is very likly a misprint.
Still, if it is a misprint, I wonder why the shift from Greek- to Italian-esque naming?

I think they have a whole "Cheliax is Italy" thing going on now. Maybe they didn't have that so much before?

If/when it ever comes up in my game, I would just treat them as two noble houses famed for their archers. I mean... I'm sure a country could support at least two. They probably compete in the annual archery competitions.

Contributor

Marc Radle 81 wrote:

I recently received my Cheliax Empire of Devils Companion an I really like it. Well done!

I did notice one thing that might be a discrepancy.

In the Cheliax entry of the Campaign Setting book, under Notable Noble Houses, it mentions House Narikopolus as being famed for their archers.

In the Cheliax companion, in the Righteous North section (page 10) there is mention of "House Napiciza, famed archers of Cheliax"

Now, it certainly is possible that there are two Houses famous for their archers, but it seems unlikely. Is this a small breach in continuity, an editorial change, or are there in fact two house equally famed for their archers?

I ask specifically because I wanted to use this hook a little in the background of the ranger I am creating to take through the COT adventur path.

Thanks!!!

Sean would be the guy to ask on this one. In the version I turned over, it was Narikopolus.

(Let's see how he gets out of the way of THAT bus!)

-Colin

Dark Archive

Colin McComb wrote:

Sean would be the guy to ask on this one. In the version I turned over, it was Narikopolus.

(Let's see how he gets out of the way of THAT bus!)

-Colin

Beep, beep!

The bus, it honks for thee!

The Exchange

Wolf Munroe wrote:
I think they have a whole "Cheliax is Italy" thing going on now. Maybe they didn't have that so much before?

I think it was there from the beginning. I remember the questions which arose when we found out that there's no chelish names in the Rise of the Runelords Player's Guide. Even then, Mike (McArtor) pointed to Italy and the roman languages. If I remember correctly he was also the first one to compare parts of the chelish culture to ancient Rome.

But there were more pressing matters at hand in the meantime (Second Darkness and Legacy of Fire) so the focus shifted away from Cheliax a bit. Until now that is.

Silver Crusade

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Sean fell in love with an erinyes and as a result his editing mojo is waning.


Sanakht Inaros wrote:

Osirian did it all on their own

Yeah! They needed no help being subjugated by Quadira after centuries of decline!


Marc Radle 81 wrote:

I recently received my Cheliax Empire of Devils Companion an I really like it. Well done!

I did notice one thing that might be a discrepancy.

In the Cheliax entry of the Campaign Setting book, under Notable Noble Houses, it mentions House Narikopolus as being famed for their archers.

In the Cheliax companion, in the Righteous North section (page 10) there is mention of "House Napiciza, famed archers of Cheliax"

There is a huge rivalry between the two and they both make grandiose claims which are sometimes repeated by various media sources.

The truth is any Andoran pig farmer can outshoot either one. The Chellaxians pay top dollar for their reputation.

Contributor

The name sounded too Greek to me, and given all the attention we've been giving to how Cheliax is more Venetian, I made the change. Nothing wrong with Greek, but it stood out strangely in my mind compared to the other material we've been working on (even though that's the name from the PFCS), so I changed it.

If you like, you can have one be an offshoot of the other (perhaps because of the rise of the House of Thrune), trying to establish itself as a viable competitor to the original.

Paizo Employee Director of Brand Strategy

In a discussion regarding hierarchy of canon sources for the wiki, James Jacobs said that the highest tier sources are the CS hardcover and the AP volumes. Since the discrepancy here is between the CS and a Companion, I think the CS wins. At least assuming the word of the EIC is to be believed.


Hmmm. I would have thought it was a bit... early... in Golarion's life for such errors and inconsistencies. Especially since the Cheliax entry in the (reasonably recent) CS wasn't all that long.

Liberty's Edge

yoda8myhead wrote:
In a discussion regarding hierarchy of canon sources for the wiki, James Jacobs said that the highest tier sources are the CS hardcover and the AP volumes. Since the discrepancy here is between the CS and a Companion, I think the CS wins. At least assuming the word of the EIC is to be believed.

not this time

Sean changed it specifically to sound more accord to the setting...

or so he said :P
maybe its just a pretext :D

Dark Archive

Sanakht Inaros wrote:

Cheliax is only "awesome" if you totally ignore the rest of the world and don't know that Osirian did it all on their own withouth the help of devils, demons, Aztlanti, and aboleths...

Just sayin'.

You! You with the smart mouth!

You watch your dirty Osirian talk.

Or I'll eat your brain!

Liberty's Edge

Not a huge deal but a bit odd. For my part, I actually like canon discrepancies for various reasons. It just seems like a weird change overall.

But not a major one and certainly nothing that can't be altered or justified.

Edit: I keep trying to phrase this so it accurately reflect my thoughts. For some reason, I am having trouble and it always comes out more harsh than I mean to. :)


Arnwyn wrote:
Hmmm. I would have thought it was a bit... early... in Golarion's life for such errors and inconsistencies. Especially since the Cheliax entry in the (reasonably recent) CS wasn't all that long.

Teething problems.


alleynbard wrote:

Not a huge deal but a bit odd. For my part, I actually like canon discrepancies for various reasons. It just seems like a weird change overall.

But not a major one and certainly nothing that can't be altered or justified.

Edit: I keep trying to phrase this so it accurately reflect my thoughts. For some reason, I am having trouble and it always comes out more harsh than I mean to. :)

No wonder: You Taldanes are an offense all by yourself.


Personally I chalk it up to the "disinformation" campaign of the Golarian team. After all they've pointed out that some of the "common information" is down right wrong, and somethings have multiple sources and myths behind them that even the Gods don't really know the truth of.

I just file this under that category. The Cheliaxians have their way of saying/spelling it, and everyone else (the Taldans for example) have theirs.

Liberty's Edge

Abraham spalding wrote:


I just file this under that category. The Cheliaxians have their way of saying/spelling it, and everyone else (the Taldans for example) have theirs.

That is how I see it as well.

Liberty's Edge

KaeYoss wrote:


No wonder: You Taldanes are an offense all by yourself.

Oh...I'm sorry. Is that you buzzing? I thought it was a fly or a mosquito. Not that there is much difference between a bloodsucking mosquito and a blood sucking Chelaxian, so you can see my confusion.

Scarab Sages

Abraham spalding wrote:
I just file this under that category. The Cheliaxians have their way of saying/spelling it (the wrong way), and everyone else (the Taldans for example) have theirs (the right way).

Fixed it for ya.


alleynbard wrote:
KaeYoss wrote:


No wonder: You Taldanes are an offense all by yourself.

Oh...I'm sorry. Is that you buzzing? I thought it was a fly or a mosquito. Not that there is much difference between a bloodsucking mosquito and a blood sucking Chelaxian, so you can see my confusion.

Oh, there is one difference: The Chelaxian's nation doesn't suck.

I assume that with mosquito, you meant Taldane. That's what we call you over here: Mosquito. Because you're so small, and so annoying, but if anyone ever bothers, a single swipe will get rid of you.

Scarab Sages

See how delusional Chelaxians are? The poor souls must beg, borrow, and steal their cultural identity.

Denial. It's an ugly thing.


Sanakht Inaros wrote:

See how delusional Chelaxians are? The poor souls must beg, borrow, and steal their cultural identity.

Denial. It's an ugly thing.

So that's why my mirror broke when I held it in your direction.

Scarab Sages

KaeYoss wrote:
Sanakht Inaros wrote:

See how delusional Chelaxians are? The poor souls must beg, borrow, and steal their cultural identity.

Denial. It's an ugly thing.

So that's why my mirror broke when I held it in your direction.

If you had opened your eyes you would have seen that it was already broke.

It's okay, though. You have our sympathies. It must be hard when your god dies and your people don't know where to turn. It's only been 100 years. I give it another 50 before Cheliax completes its fall.

Dark Archive

Sanakht Inaros wrote:
KaeYoss wrote:
Sanakht Inaros wrote:

See how delusional Chelaxians are? The poor souls must beg, borrow, and steal their cultural identity.

Denial. It's an ugly thing.

So that's why my mirror broke when I held it in your direction.

If you had opened your eyes you would have seen that it was already broke.

It's okay, though. You have our sympathies. It must be hard when your god dies and your people don't know where to turn. It's only been 100 years. I give it another 50 before Cheliax completes its fall.

Oh, look! A misguided soul! Here, have a cookie *displays aromatic fresh batch of lactose-free, non-gluten chocolate chip cookies to Sanakht Inaros. In the background, a succubus smirks*


Yeah that's what they get for taking a Taldan god as their own... should have known better.

Contributor

Sean K Reynolds wrote:

The name sounded too Greek to me, and given all the attention we've been giving to how Cheliax is more Venetian, I made the change. Nothing wrong with Greek, but it stood out strangely in my mind compared to the other material we've been working on (even though that's the name from the PFCS), so I changed it.

If you like, you can have one be an offshoot of the other (perhaps because of the rise of the House of Thrune), trying to establish itself as a viable competitor to the original.

That's what I meant to say. Narikopolus is the new House favored by the Thrunii--the third-in-line heir declared enthusiastically for House Thrune during the troubles, and was rewarded with a title of paranobility. He changed his name (and that of his followers) to House Napiciza, and his heirs have spent the remaining time trying to wrest actual control of the north from the original Napiciza.

Because Napiciza has since declared allegiance to the Thrunii, Egorian has no vested interest in the outcome of the struggle--and so the battle continues in politics, bribes, and bloody guerrilla battles in the hills and mountains of the north.

Scarab Sages

joela wrote:


Oh, look! A misguided soul! Here, have a cookie *displays aromatic fresh batch of lactose-free, non-gluten chocolate chip cookies to Sanakht Inaros. In the background, a succubus smirks*

AHHHHH....How cute! Now they think they can cook!


joela wrote:
In the background, a succubus smirks*[/i]

Succubus? So you traffic with demons, Joela? We'll have so send a Paralictor and his fine companions over to you to have a chat about the company you keep. Do you have torture implements at your home or does he have to bring his own? }>


Sanakht Inaros wrote:
It must be hard when your god dies

What are you talking about? I'm not dead. Definitely not.


Sanakht Inaros wrote:
joela wrote:


Oh, look! A misguided soul! Here, have a cookie *displays aromatic fresh batch of lactose-free, non-gluten chocolate chip cookies to Sanakht Inaros. In the background, a succubus smirks*
AHHHHH....How cute! Now they think they can cook!

Never heard of Hell's Kitchen? World Famous!

Scarab Sages

KaeYoss wrote:
Never heard of Hell's Kitchen? World Famous!

Yep. World's. Worst. Eatery.

Lantern Lodge

When i play chelexians, i ignore all the stuff relating to demons. (i made one as a pc, she traffics with angels not demons/devils. and comes from a family tradition of such. almost complete subversion of the standard chelexian. not an expansionist but a borderline pacifist, not a nuke but a bandage, good instead of evil, comes from sandpoint instead of korvosa, has a latin name. her whole purpose was to subvert major chelexian standards. goodie two shoes rather than an indulgent sinner. chaste rather than sleeping with every incubus/succuubus that passes by. wishes to be an angel, not a demon or devil. follower of sarenrae, not big bad archfiend. it's fun to subvert chelexians and other typically evil races, and thier cultures.)

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Lost Omens Campaign Setting / General Discussion / Cheliax - Companion vs. Campaign Setting question All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in General Discussion