Fast experience or Medium experience? (PFRPG)


Curse of the Crimson Throne


Im converting my CotCT campaign to PFRGP an Im confused as to what experience method to use, when I was reading the conversion document it said that the default in 3.5 was fast so I changed to fast progresion but know that I have the new AP it says that uses the medium progresion and now I dont know if my players will level up to fast for my campaign.

Should I use the fast or medium xp chart? Im not adding encounters to the AP and Im using the new way to calculate how much xp each npc/monster is worth.

Thanks.

Liberty's Edge

I am using fast and it is working about on par. If anything I have had to pad a few encoutners and for extra xp in a bit here and there (I have 5 players in both games of this that I run). I think the padding is a result of Paizo leaving some wiggle room for random encounters and side treks. So for as written I recomend the fast chart. If you can work a few more encounters into the adventures the medium chart may be a better bet for you.


I've been running with fast xp, and it's almost exactly where the adventures want them to be in terms of level. I have 4 players.


Thanks I will use the fast xp.

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder Adventure Path / Curse of the Crimson Throne / Fast experience or Medium experience? (PFRPG) All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in Curse of the Crimson Throne