Don't forget, you get to add a +3 bonus to all class skills with a rank, and with the condensed skill lists, your skill points stretch farther than they used to.
I see your problem. It's somewhat alleviated by the fact that (give or take some) only two-thirds of the skills from 3.5e are actually in PF. Ex., the Rogue gets the benefits of five (!) of the classes iconic skills rolled up into Perception and Stealth alone.
As for the poor skill-point deprived classes, the oft-mentioned matter of doing away with the 2 SP might be enough to make it worth while (excepting the Wizard, perhaps, given that they'll have a high INT mod). I've always found it strange that the Fighter, in particular, apparently spent so much time learning how to hit something with a sword that even the (stereotypically) dumb-as-nails Barbarian had twice his base skill points. That'd put things about right in my book, at least, and would probably be the extent of what might creep its way into a core rulebook.
EDIT: Clarification; I mean giving the Cleric, Fighter, Paladin and Sorcerer 4 SP per level instead of 2. I'm not sure how much giving that to wizards would throw things off-kilter.
For house ruling suggestions, I believe I had a DM that gave us 40 SP to start with (this was in plain 3.5e, mind you, with the old skills system) regardless of class. That might be going a little bit overboard, but giving some flat points to be used at first level (four or five, maybe), perhaps with restrictions that they go into Perform/Profession/Craft/other flavor-type skills seems reasonable to me. Outright multiplying SP at first level might bias things in favor of the higher SP classes.
Yes your character might seem like a specialist starting out, but when you level up your not limited to what skills you put your skill points into, you don't have to put that rank in the same skill as you did last level, you can choose to diversify over specialize every Level up, not just level 1. And in Pathfinder you can even put ranks in cross-class skills without penalty, allowing you to diversify even more.
|
House Rule option: Right now the default is set that the max rank in any skill = level. Change that to level+1 and you eliminate the every-1st-level-character-is-equally-skilled problem without screwing up backwards compatibility. It allows for every character and NPC ever created thus far and assumes they chose to spread out their skill points such that their ranks equaled their level, but one could make a specialist character who put the same number of points into fewer skills and ended up a little better. This really only makes a difference at 1st level when you've normally only got one point per skill, where as with this house rule you could have one rank ... or two!
Example: Under the current Beta rules, a rogue starts with 8 skill points. Because of the max ranks = level rule, she MUST spend them on 8 different skills, and ends up being 1 rank good at 8 things. With my house rule, she can be 1 rank good at 8 things, or 2 ranks good at 4 things, or 1 rank good at 4 things and 2 ranks good at 2 things, etc.
It allows for much more flexibility and diversity with regard to starting skill levels without messing up the formulas for determining how many skill points people get or how they can be spent AND maintains backwards compatibility. The only possible downside (and I don't mind it) is that some characters may be a tad more skilled than before, by one rank, but their overall allocation of skill points doesn't change so the character who is over-skilled in one area must be under-skilled in another.
|
I house-ruled it to double skill points at first level, which hasn't seemed to skew my game at all but let people fill out their skills lists pretty well. The rogue was basically good at everything at 1st level, but the cleric and barbarian were able to have a wide enough range of bumps that they could keep up. In a game with only 3 active PCs, that helped -- I might keep it as is in a larger party.
The slight tweak of making max ranks lvl+1 seems to work too -- I think this is something pretty easily addressed with small changes, by and large the new skill system works out fine.
I just use no less then 4 skills per level...that seems to help
One of the GMs at my table started giving all classes +2 skill points/level, it hasn't broken the game so far so I started doing the same, characters seem a lot more interesting and 3D now, but then our games make use of skills a lot more often than your BaB.
Then again a 1st level character, isn't meant to be a specialist in anything, they have just been trained with no experience, only when they have gained experience and leveled up, should they be allowed to specialize.